rename packages/ to recipes/ per earlier agreement

See links below for more details:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.handhelds.openembedded/21326
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.handhelds.openembedded/21816

Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>
Acked-by: Mike Westerhof <mwester@dls.net>
Acked-by: Philip Balister <philip@balister.org>
Acked-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Marcin Juszkiewicz <hrw@openembedded.org>
Acked-by: Koen Kooi <koen@openembedded.org>
Acked-by: Frans Meulenbroeks <fransmeulenbroeks@gmail.com>

1 files changed, 238 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/recipes/kexecboot/linux-kexecboot-2.6.24/tosa/0024-Update-Documentation-gpio.txt-primarily-to-include.patch b/recipes/kexecboot/linux-kexecboot-2.6.24/tosa/0024-Update-Documentation-gpio.txt-primarily-to-include.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..e460379de6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/recipes/kexecboot/linux-kexecboot-2.6.24/tosa/0024-Update-Documentation-gpio.txt-primarily-to-include.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,238 @@
+From 7ba82399f2d2df6114ad552999f2e1b9a19cb47a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
+Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:41:18 +0300
+Subject: [PATCH 24/64] Update Documentation/gpio.txt, primarily to include the new "gpiolib"
+ infrastructure.
+
+Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
+Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
+Cc: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com>
+Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
+Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com>
+Cc: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com>
+Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
+Cc: Ben Gardner <bgardner@wabtec.com>
+Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
+---
+ Documentation/gpio.txt |  133 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
+ 1 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/Documentation/gpio.txt b/Documentation/gpio.txt
+index 6bc2ba2..8da724e 100644
+--- a/Documentation/gpio.txt
++++ b/Documentation/gpio.txt
+@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ The exact capabilities of GPIOs vary between systems.  Common options:
+   - Input values are likewise readable (1, 0).  Some chips support readback
+     of pins configured as "output", which is very useful in such "wire-OR"
+     cases (to support bidirectional signaling).  GPIO controllers may have
+-    input de-glitch logic, sometimes with software controls.
++    input de-glitch/debounce logic, sometimes with software controls.
+ 
+   - Inputs can often be used as IRQ signals, often edge triggered but
+     sometimes level triggered.  Such IRQs may be configurable as system
+@@ -60,10 +60,13 @@ used on a board that's wired differently.  Only least-common-denominator
+ functionality can be very portable.  Other features are platform-specific,
+ and that can be critical for glue logic.
+ 
+-Plus, this doesn't define an implementation framework, just an interface.
++Plus, this doesn't require any implementation framework, just an interface.
+ One platform might implement it as simple inline functions accessing chip
+ registers; another might implement it by delegating through abstractions
+-used for several very different kinds of GPIO controller.
++used for several very different kinds of GPIO controller.  (There is some
++optional code supporting such an implementation strategy, described later
++in this document, but drivers acting as clients to the GPIO interface must
++not care how it's implemented.)
+ 
+ That said, if the convention is supported on their platform, drivers should
+ use it when possible.  Platforms should declare GENERIC_GPIO support in
+@@ -121,6 +124,11 @@ before tasking is enabled, as part of early board setup.
+ For output GPIOs, the value provided becomes the initial output value.
+ This helps avoid signal glitching during system startup.
+ 
++For compatibility with legacy interfaces to GPIOs, setting the direction
++of a GPIO implicitly requests that GPIO (see below) if it has not been
++requested already.  That compatibility may be removed in the future;
++explicitly requesting GPIOs is strongly preferred.
++
+ Setting the direction can fail if the GPIO number is invalid, or when
+ that particular GPIO can't be used in that mode.  It's generally a bad
+ idea to rely on boot firmware to have set the direction correctly, since
+@@ -133,6 +141,7 @@ Spinlock-Safe GPIO access
+ -------------------------
+ Most GPIO controllers can be accessed with memory read/write instructions.
+ That doesn't need to sleep, and can safely be done from inside IRQ handlers.
++(That includes hardirq contexts on RT kernels.)
+ 
+ Use these calls to access such GPIOs:
+ 
+@@ -145,7 +154,7 @@ Use these calls to access such GPIOs:
+ The values are boolean, zero for low, nonzero for high.  When reading the
+ value of an output pin, the value returned should be what's seen on the
+ pin ... that won't always match the specified output value, because of
+-issues including wire-OR and output latencies.
++issues including open-drain signaling and output latencies.
+ 
+ The get/set calls have no error returns because "invalid GPIO" should have
+ been reported earlier from gpio_direction_*().  However, note that not all
+@@ -170,7 +179,8 @@ get to the head of a queue to transmit a command and get its response.
+ This requires sleeping, which can't be done from inside IRQ handlers.
+ 
+ Platforms that support this type of GPIO distinguish them from other GPIOs
+-by returning nonzero from this call:
++by returning nonzero from this call (which requires a valid GPIO number,
++either explicitly or implicitly requested):
+ 
+ 	int gpio_cansleep(unsigned gpio);
+ 
+@@ -209,8 +219,11 @@ before tasking is enabled, as part of early board setup.
+ These calls serve two basic purposes.  One is marking the signals which
+ are actually in use as GPIOs, for better diagnostics; systems may have
+ several hundred potential GPIOs, but often only a dozen are used on any
+-given board.  Another is to catch conflicts between drivers, reporting
+-errors when drivers wrongly think they have exclusive use of that signal.
++given board.  Another is to catch conflicts, identifying errors when
++(a) two or more drivers wrongly think they have exclusive use of that
++signal, or (b) something wrongly believes it's safe to remove drivers
++needed to manage a signal that's in active use.  That is, requesting a
++GPIO can serve as a kind of lock.
+ 
+ These two calls are optional because not not all current Linux platforms
+ offer such functionality in their GPIO support; a valid implementation
+@@ -223,6 +236,9 @@ Note that requesting a GPIO does NOT cause it to be configured in any
+ way; it just marks that GPIO as in use.  Separate code must handle any
+ pin setup (e.g. controlling which pin the GPIO uses, pullup/pulldown).
+ 
++Also note that it's your responsibility to have stopped using a GPIO
++before you free it.
++
+ 
+ GPIOs mapped to IRQs
+ --------------------
+@@ -238,7 +254,7 @@ map between them using calls like:
+ 
+ Those return either the corresponding number in the other namespace, or
+ else a negative errno code if the mapping can't be done.  (For example,
+-some GPIOs can't used as IRQs.)  It is an unchecked error to use a GPIO
++some GPIOs can't be used as IRQs.)  It is an unchecked error to use a GPIO
+ number that wasn't set up as an input using gpio_direction_input(), or
+ to use an IRQ number that didn't originally come from gpio_to_irq().
+ 
+@@ -299,17 +315,110 @@ Related to multiplexing is configuration and enabling of the pullups or
+ pulldowns integrated on some platforms.  Not all platforms support them,
+ or support them in the same way; and any given board might use external
+ pullups (or pulldowns) so that the on-chip ones should not be used.
++(When a circuit needs 5 kOhm, on-chip 100 kOhm resistors won't do.)
+ 
+ There are other system-specific mechanisms that are not specified here,
+ like the aforementioned options for input de-glitching and wire-OR output.
+ Hardware may support reading or writing GPIOs in gangs, but that's usually
+ configuration dependent:  for GPIOs sharing the same bank.  (GPIOs are
+ commonly grouped in banks of 16 or 32, with a given SOC having several such
+-banks.)  Some systems can trigger IRQs from output GPIOs.  Code relying on
+-such mechanisms will necessarily be nonportable.
++banks.)  Some systems can trigger IRQs from output GPIOs, or read values
++from pins not managed as GPIOs.  Code relying on such mechanisms will
++necessarily be nonportable.
+ 
+-Dynamic definition of GPIOs is not currently supported; for example, as
++Dynamic definition of GPIOs is not currently standard; for example, as
+ a side effect of configuring an add-on board with some GPIO expanders.
+ 
+ These calls are purely for kernel space, but a userspace API could be built
+-on top of it.
++on top of them.
++
++
++GPIO implementor's framework (OPTIONAL)
++=======================================
++As noted earlier, there is an optional implementation framework making it
++easier for platforms to support different kinds of GPIO controller using
++the same programming interface.
++
++As a debugging aid, if debugfs is available a /sys/kernel/debug/gpio file
++will be found there.  That will list all the controllers registered through
++this framework, and the state of the GPIOs currently in use.
++
++
++Controller Drivers: gpio_chip
++-----------------------------
++In this framework each GPIO controller is packaged as a "struct gpio_chip"
++with information common to each controller of that type:
++
++ - methods to establish GPIO direction
++ - methods used to access GPIO values
++ - flag saying whether calls to its methods may sleep
++ - optional debugfs dump method (showing extra state like pullup config)
++ - label for diagnostics
++
++There is also per-instance data, which may come from device.platform_data:
++the number of its first GPIO, and how many GPIOs it exposes.
++
++The code implementing a gpio_chip should support multiple instances of the
++controller, possibly using the driver model.  That code will configure each
++gpio_chip and issue gpiochip_add().  Removing a GPIO controller should be
++rare; use gpiochip_remove() when it is unavoidable.
++
++Most often a gpio_chip is part of an instance-specific structure with state
++not exposed by the GPIO interfaces, such as addressing, power management,
++and more.  Chips such as codecs will have complex non-GPIO state,
++
++Any debugfs dump method should normally ignore signals which haven't been
++requested as GPIOs.  They can use gpiochip_is_requested(), which returns
++either NULL or the label associated with that GPIO when it was requested.
++
++
++Platform Support
++----------------
++To support this framework, a platform's Kconfig will "select HAVE_GPIO_LIB"
++and arrange that its <asm/gpio.h> includes <asm-generic/gpio.h> and defines
++three functions: gpio_get_value(), gpio_set_value(), and gpio_cansleep().
++They may also want to provide a custom value for ARCH_NR_GPIOS.
++
++Trivial implementations of those functions can directly use framework
++code, which always dispatches through the gpio_chip:
++
++  #define gpio_get_value	__gpio_get_value
++  #define gpio_set_value	__gpio_set_value
++  #define gpio_cansleep		__gpio_cansleep
++
++Fancier implementations could instead define those as inline functions with
++logic optimizing access to specific SOC-based GPIOs.  For example, if the
++referenced GPIO is the constant "12", getting or setting its value could
++cost as little as two or three instructions, never sleeping.  When such an
++optimization is not possible those calls must delegate to the framework
++code, costing at least a few dozen instructions.  For bitbanged I/O, such
++instruction savings can be significant.
++
++For SOCs, platform-specific code defines and registers gpio_chip instances
++for each bank of on-chip GPIOs.  Those GPIOs should be numbered/labeled to
++match chip vendor documentation, and directly match board schematics.  They
++may well start at zero and go up to a platform-specific limit.  Such GPIOs
++are normally integrated into platform initialization to make them always be
++available, from arch_initcall() or earlier; they can often serve as IRQs.
++
++
++Board Support
++-------------
++For external GPIO controllers -- such as I2C or SPI expanders, ASICs, multi
++function devices, FPGAs or CPLDs -- most often board-specific code handles
++registering controller devices and ensures that their drivers know what GPIO
++numbers to use with gpiochip_add().  Their numbers often start right after
++platform-specific GPIOs.
++
++For example, board setup code could create structures identifying the range
++of GPIOs that chip will expose, and passes them to each GPIO expander chip
++using platform_data.  Then the chip driver's probe() routine could pass that
++data to gpiochip_add().
++
++Initialization order can be important.  For example, when a device relies on
++an I2C-based GPIO, its probe() routine should only be called after that GPIO
++becomes available.  That may mean the device should not be registered until
++calls for that GPIO can work.  One way to address such dependencies is for
++such gpio_chip controllers to provide setup() and teardown() callbacks to
++board specific code; those board specific callbacks would register devices
++once all the necessary resources are available.
+-- 
+1.5.3.8
+