| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files |
|---|
|
do_patch rule of SDK's workspace/appends/linux-*.bbhappend may fail if script are not written in Python
that was the case with Phytec's BSP, the fix was to replace the do_patch rule with :
do_patch[noexec]="1" when the file was generated in scripts/lib/devtool/standard.py
Signed-off-by: Yann CARDAILLAC <yann.cardaillac@smile.fr>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
|
|
The check_commits logic assumes that both devtool-base and args.branch
exist in the git repo that it is operating on. In order to prevent
errors at that point it's best to first ensure that both of these refs
actually exist. If they don't both exist then the check_commits logic
should just be skipped, as it would be if the repo wasn't originally
checked out by devtool.
Previously if a user removed the args.branch branch from their devtool
cloned repo this code would crash on adding the repo with -n. The crash
would look like this:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/ddedrick/src/poky/scripts/devtool", line 344, in <module>
ret = main()
File "/home/ddedrick/src/poky/scripts/devtool", line 331, in main
ret = args.func(args, config, basepath, workspace)
File "/home/ddedrick/src/poky/scripts/lib/devtool/standard.py", line 812, in modify
(stdout, _) = bb.process.run('git log devtool-base..%s' % branch, cwd=srctree)
File "/home/ddedrick/src/poky/bitbake/lib/bb/process.py", line 178, in run
raise ExecutionError(cmd, pipe.returncode, stdout, stderr)
bb.process.ExecutionError: Execution of 'git log devtool-base..devtool' failed with exit code 128:
fatal: ambiguous argument 'devtool-base..devtool': unknown revision or path not in the working tree.
Use '--' to separate paths from revisions, like this:
'git <command> [<revision>...] -- [<file>...]'
(From OE-Core rev: f13a3490fdb404bbd4c77e45b83540d6deec1358)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
|
|
DEVTOOL_EXTRA_OVERRIDES only needs one entry for each instance of
overrides. Previous to these changes it would find every override to
SRC_URI and add it to the list. This would duplicate instances where
SRC_URI is modified multiple times with the same override like:
SRC_URI_append_foo += "file://0001-foo.patch"
SRC_URI_append_foo += "file://0002-bar.patch"
A bbappend might also overwrite a SRC_URI override, which would also
cause multiple instances to occur.
When there are multiple instances of the same override in
DEVTOOL_EXTRA_OVERRIDES it causes devtool modify to fail when creating
override branches. The failure occurs when attempting to create the same
override branch a second time and looks like this:
The stack trace of python calls that resulted in this exception/failure was:
File: 'exec_python_func() autogenerated', lineno: 2, function: <module>
0001:
*** 0002:devtool_post_patch(d)
0003:
File: '/build/poky/meta/classes/devtool-source.bbclass', lineno: 202, function: devtool_post_patch
0198:
0199: for override in extra_override_list:
0200: localdata = bb.data.createCopy(d)
0201: if override in default_overrides:
*** 0202: bb.process.run('git branch devtool-override-%s %s' % (override, devbranch), cwd=srcsubdir)
0203: else:
0204: # Reset back to the initial commit on a new branch
0205: bb.process.run('git checkout %s -b devtool-override-%s' % (initial_rev, override), cwd=srcsubdir)
0206: # Run do_patch function with the override applied
File: '/build/poky/bitbake/lib/bb/process.py', lineno: 178, function: run
0174: if not stderr is None:
0175: stderr = stderr.decode("utf-8")
0176:
0177: if pipe.returncode != 0:
*** 0178: raise ExecutionError(cmd, pipe.returncode, stdout, stderr)
0179: return stdout, stderr
Exception: bb.process.ExecutionError: Execution of 'git branch devtool-override-foo devtool' failed with exit code 128:
fatal: A branch named 'devtool-override-foo' already exists.
(From OE-Core rev: 90f667db2219f04e6d61588cd61056d3d8da6d7d)
Signed-off-by: Dan Dedrick <ddedrick@lexmark.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
|
|
The warn method is deprecated. We should use the documented warning instead.
Quoting from the python's official doc:
"""
Note: There is an obsolete method warn which is functionally identical to warning.
As warn is deprecated, please do not use it - use warning instead.
"""
Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
This is very useful for updating patch context so that any fuzz is eliminated.
Simply issue:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Without this flag, devtool will not deem the commits in the workspace
different to patches in the layer, even if the commits have different,
up-to-date context line in them.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
After OE-Core rev 5e3fe00a0233d563781849a44f53885b4e924a9c we call
os.path.abspath() on the original layer path, but we later compare that
to the destination layer path. If that layer path isn't absolute but is
effectively the same path, it should be writing to the original recipe
but because we weren't making it absolute we were writing a bbappend
instead. Call os.path.abspath() on the destination path as well to avoid
that.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If the .devtool_md5 file doesn't contain a reference to the bbappend
file (e.g. because devtool was interrupted before it could write that
out) then _check_preserve() won't delete it, so we need to delete it
separately because otherwise the recipe won't actually be reset.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Fix two aspects of handling BBCLASSEXTENDed targets (e.g.
openssl-native) that have been run through "devtool upgrade":
* Fix recipe name not showing up in "devtool status"
* Fix "devtool reset" not deleting empty directories under the recipe
directory within the workspace, which may lead to problems if you
subsequently run "devtool upgrade" on the same target again
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If you have a recipe that uses overrides to conditionally extend
SRC_URI to add additional patches, then you will often need to update
those patches if you're making other changes to the source tree (for
example if you're upgrading the underlying source). Make this possible
with devtool by creating devtool-override-* branches for each override
that conditionally appends/prepends SRC_URI, and have devtool
update-recipe / finish check each branch out in turn and update the
corresponding patches.
A current example of a recipe that does this is the quota recipe - it
applies an additional patch if musl is the selected C library (i.e.
libc-musl is in OVERRIDES).
Note that use of this functionality does require some care - in
particular, updates to patches that appear on the main branch (named
"devtool" by default) should be made there and not only on one of the
specific devtool-override-* branches that are created for each override.
The recommended procedure is to make the changes you want to make to the
main branch first, then check out and rebase each devtool-override-*
branch, testing each one by activating the corresponding configuration,
and then finally run devtool finish.
Fixes [YOCTO #11516].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
If you're not sure what changes devtool finish is going to make, or
you're not sure you're finished with your modifications, it is useful to
be able to see what devtool finish is going to do beforehand, so add
a -N/--dry-run option to make that possible.
(It's also very useful for debugging devtool finish itself.)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
If a file is going to be effectively removed from the destination by
devtool finish, we should report that rather than just reporting that
we're removing files from the workspace. This is a little tricky because
the way we actually operate when finishing is to:
(1) remove all original files (as recorded by devtool upgrade, if that
was used)
(2) as part of updating the recipe file, remove the files from next to
the new recipe (i.e. in the workspace for an upgrade, real recipe
otherwise) corresponding to commits not in the git tree
(3) copy over remaining files from the workspace to the destination
To report the files removed with respect to what was originally there,
we need to swap steps 1 and 2 so we can see what no longer exists after
the deletion, and suppress the reporting currently done in step 2 -
however, we still want to report removal in step 2 for the non-upgrade
case, so the latter is conditional.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
If the files that the devtool-source class is supposed to create in the
source tree aren't found in the temporary directory then we know that
the class hasn't worked properly - say that explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
If the directory where the source code extracts to changes (for
example, when upgrading iucode-tool from 1.5 to 2.1.1, the subdirectory
in the tarball changed from "iucode_tool-${PV}" to "iucode-tool-${PV}")
then handle this automatically. Also handle when it changes to match the
default S value (i.e. "${WORKDIR}/${BP}") in which case we just drop
setting S in the recipe.
Fixes [YOCTO #10939].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
devtool finish will check if the destination layer is part of
bblayers.conf so that we avoid the user getting confused about the
recipe vanishing from their configuration if it isn't. devtool finish
also accepts a path underneath a layer so that you have a bit
more control over where it ends up. However if you used a path
underneath a layer then it wasn't converting this to the base of the
layer before checking it against BBLAYERS, thus the warning was being
shown erroneously in that case.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
If the git repository for a recipe in the workspace has uncommitted
changes in it then it's possible that the user has forgotten to commit
something, so check and exit if there are any. Provide a -f/--force
option to continue in the case where the uncommitted changes aren't
needed.
Separately, if the repository is in the middle of a rebase or git am /
apply then error out (without the opportunity to force) since the user
really needs to sort this out before finishing.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
If S points to a subdirectory of the source rather than the "base" of
the source tree then print that rather than the subdirectory path when
telling the user they need to remove the source tree, since that is the
directory that they will need to remove.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
* Show a warning in devtool upgrade if the version is less than the
current version suggesting that the user may need to bump PE in the
recipe
* Show a warning in devtool add and devtool upgrade if the version looks
like a pre-release version suggesting using a version number that
won't mess up the progression when you come to upgrade to the final
release version.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
If S points to a subdirectory of the source rather than the "base" of
the source tree then we weren't handling the oe-local-files directory
properly - it got extracted to the base of the tree but devtool
update-recipe and devtool finish assumed it would be under S which would
be the subdirectory, thus it would be missing and devtool would assume
the files had been deleted and remove them from the recipe. Record the
base of the source tree in the bbappend and read it into the in-memory
workspace so we can use that to find out where oe-local-files should be
found.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
If SRCREV contains a variable reference, any devtool command that
would try to update it would fail. E.g., if SRCREV = "R${PV}", then
devtool finish without having committed any changes would fail with:
oe.patch.CmdError: Command Error: 'sh -c 'git format-patch R${PV} -o
/tmp/oepatchb_doareb -- .'' exited with 0 Output:
fatal: bad revision 'R'
Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Alongside reworking the way devtool extracts source, we now need to
ensure that within the extensible SDK where task signatures are locked,
the signatures of the tasks for the recipes being worked on get unlocked
at the right time or otherwise we'll now get taskhash mismatches when
running devtool modify on a recipe that was included in the eSDK such as
the kernel (due to a separate bug). The existing mechanism for
auto-unlocking recipes was a little weak and was happening too late, so
I've reimplemented it so that:
(a) it gets triggered immediately when the recipe/append is created
(b) we avoid writing to the unlocked signatures file unnecessarily
(since it's a global configuration file) and
(c) within the eSDK configuration we whitelist SIGGEN_UNLOCKED_RECIPES
to avoid unnecessary reparses every time we perform one of the
devtool operations that does need to change this list.
Fixes [YOCTO #11883] (not the underlying cause, but this manifestation
of the issue).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Since it was first implemented, devtool's source extraction (as used by
the devtool modify, extract and upgrade subcommands) ignored other recipe
dependencies - so for example if you ran devtool modify on a recipe that
fetches from svn or is compressed using xz then it would fail if those
dependencies hadn't been built first. Now that we can execute tasks in
the normal way (i.e. tinfoil.build_targets()) then we can rework it to
use that. This is slightly tricky in that the source extraction needs to
insert some logic in between tasks; luckily we can use a helper class
that conditionally adds prefuncs to make that possible.
Some side-effects / aspects of this change worth noting:
* Operations are a little slower because we have to go through the task
dependency graph generation and other startup processing. There's not
really any way to avoid this though.
* devtool extract didn't used to require a workspace, now it does
because it needs to create a temporary bbappend for the recipe. (As
with other commands the workspace be created on the fly if it doesn't
already exist.)
* I want any existing sysroot files and stamps to be left alone during
extraction since we are running the tasks off to the side, and
especially devtool extract should be able to be used without touching
these. However, this was hampered by the automatic removal process in
sstate.bbclass triggered by bb.event.ReachableStamps when the task
signatures change, thus I had to introduce a way to disable this
removal on a per-recipe basis (we still want it to function for any
dependencies that we aren't working on). To implement this I elected
to use a file written to tmp/sstate-control which gets deleted
automatically after reading so that there's less chance of stale files
affecting future sessions. I could have used a variable but this would
have needed to be whitelisted and I'd have to have poked its value in
using the setVariable command.
Fixes [YOCTO #11198].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
|
|
A recipe added with "devtool add" requires to be able to take precedence on recipes
previously defined with PREFERRED_PROVIDER.
By adding the parameter "--provides" to "devtool add" it is possible to specify
an element to be provided by the recipe. A devtool recipe can override a previous
PREFERRED_PROVIDER using the layer configuration file in the workspace.
E.g.
devtool add my-libgl git@git://my-libgl-repository --provides virtual/libgl
[YOCTO #10415]
Signed-off-by: Juan M Cruz Alcaraz <juan.m.cruz.alcaraz@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Sorted entries are easier to read.
Signed-off-by: Ola x Nilsson <olani@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
At the moment when fetching source from a git repository you have to
know that you can specify the revision and branch in the URL with
';rev=' and ';branch=' respectively, and you can also get thrown off by
the shell splitting on the ; character if you forget to surround the URL
in quotes. Add explicit -S/--srcrev and -B/--srcbranch options
(consistent with devtool upgrade) to make this easier for the user to
discover and use. (The rev and branch URL parameters will continue to
work, however.)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Patches that we identify as having been "deleted" (i.e. patches in
SRC_URI that no longer appear in the git tree) need to be dropped even
if we're updating in srcrev mode. This fixes the case where HEAD of the
git tree is valid upstream (i.e. no extra commits), but there are
patches left over in the recipe, e.g. when we do devtool upgrade and
then all of the commits rebased on top of the new branch get skipped.
Fixes [YOCTO #11972].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
In case the proposed md5sum to be appended to the .devtool_md5 file
is already present, do not append it.
Signed-off-by: Leonardo Sandoval <leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
* If an error is logged while executing a task, we need to ensure we
exit instead of assuming everything went OK.
* If we receive CookerExit, the server is shutting down and we need to
stop waiting for events and probably exit (knotty does this). This
will occur if an exception or bb.fatal() happens during an event
handler.
This fixes a couple of issues highlighted when using devtool upgrade or
modify on a non-supported recipe with intel-iot-refkit together with
bitbake master, but I'd be very surprised if it were hard to reproduce
in other scenarios.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Since we have provide an option to manually enable PREMIRRORS and MIRRORS
in recipetool, we need to make sure devtool is having the same options
as devtool uses recipetool in creating new recipes.
Signed-off-by: Chang Rebecca Swee Fun <rebecca.swee.fun.chang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Across devtool and recipetool we had an ugly set of code for ensuring
that we can call an npm binary, and much of that ugliness was a result
of not being able to run build tasks when tinfoil was active - if
recipetool found that npm was required and we didn't know beforehand
(e.g. we're fetching from a plain git repository as opposed to an npm://
URL where it's obvious) then it had to exit and return a special result
code, so that devtool knew it needed to build nodejs-native and then
call recipetool again. Now that we are using real build tasks to fetch
and unpack, we can drop most of this and move the code to the one place
where it's still needed (i.e. create_npm where we potentially have to
deal with node.js code in a plain source repository).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
When extracting linux-yocto kernel source, we don't need to dance around
shutting down and starting up tinfoil anymore, we can just execute the
tasks as needed when needed using tinfoil's new build_targets()
function. This allows us to tidy up the code structure a bit.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If for any reason the parse_recipe fail in extract command
the process gets locked because Cooker is expecting the
finish event by tinfoil.
For example:
$ devtool extract remake /tmp/remake
ERROR: remake is unavailable:
remake was skipped: PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/make set to make, not remake
Signed-off-by: Aníbal Limón <anibal.limon@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Perf is a tool build from the kernel source, which is normally available
in /work-shared/..., but when devtool is used to modify the kernel
source code, perf is not buildable since it gets an error about being unable
to add a depends to a non-exisit task do_patch.
This patch removes do_patch from the SRCTREECOVEREDTASKS and creates an empty
do_patch task to enable the VarFlags code to have someplace to attach depends
information to.
[YOCT #11120]
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
This is a non-existent event - we already have the actual
bb.build.TaskSucceeded further down in the list hence why it wasn't
noticed earlier.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If a task such as do_fetch fails when we're extracting source for a
recipe (within devtool modify / upgrade / extract / sync) then we should
naturally stop processing instead of blundering on; in order to do that
we need to be listening for the TaskFailed event. Thanks to Richard
Purdie for noticing and fixing this.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Most of the other extract-based commands have this option but oddly I
left it out for modify - I guess because if I was debugging an issue here
I just used devtool extract to do so, but there's no reason why we can't
have it here and it is useful.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If recipetool returns with exit code 14 this means devtool needs to
build nodejs-native and then call it again. If recipetool returns exit
code 14 again then clearly something has gone wrong and we should just
quit with an error.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The change over to recipe specific sysroots means that we can no longer
get a known location simply from configuration for the npm binary - we
need to get the recipe sysroot for nodejs-native, look there for npm if
we need to check it's present, and add that to PATH when calling out to
npm. Unfortunately this means anywhere we need to get that path we have
to have parsed all recipes, otherwise we have no reliable way of
resolving nodejs-native. Thus we have to change recipetool create to
always parse all recipes (the structure of the code does not allow us to
do this conditionally).
In the worst case, if npm hasn't already been added to its own sysroot
and we are fetching from a source repository rather than an npm
registry, this gets a bit ugly because we end up parsing recipes three
times:
1) recipetool startup, which then fetches the code and determines it's
a node.js module, finds that npm isn't available and then exits with
a specific error to tell devtool it needs to build npm
2) when we invoke bitbake -c addto_recipe_sysroot nodejs-native
3) when we re-invoke recipetool
This code is badly in need of refactoring, but now is unfortunately not
the time to do that, so we're going to have to live with this ugliness
for now.
Fixes [YOCTO #10992].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
When devtool writes to the kconfig fragment, it writes the output of
the diff command returned from pipe.communicate(). This function
returns binary objects. We should open the kconfig fragment file in
binary mode if we expect to write binary objects to it.
[YOCTO #11171]
Signed-off-by: Stephano Cetola <stephano.cetola@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Web applications built using e.g. angular2, usually requires that the
packages in devDependencies are available.
Thus, add an option '--fetch-dev' to both devtool add and recipetool, to
add npm packages in devDependencies to DEPENDS.
Signed-off-by: Anders Darander <anders@chargestorm.se>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
With the move to tinfoil2, the behaviour when parsing failed has changed
a bit - exceptions are now raised, so handle these appropriately.
Specifically when if parsing the recipe created when running devtool add
fails, rename it to .bb.parsefailed so that the user can run bitbake
afterwards without parsing being interrupted.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
When extracting source for a recipe within devtool (for extract, modify
or upgrade) We need to redirect WORKDIR, STAMPS_DIR etc. under a
temporary directory so that:
(a) we pick up all files that get unpacked to the WORKDIR, and
(b) we don't disturb the existing build
However, with recipe-specific sysroots the sysroots for the recipe will
be prepared under WORKDIR, and if we used the system temporary directory
i.e. usually /tmp) as used by mkdtemp by default, then our attempts to
hardlink files into the recipe-specific sysroots will fail on systems
where /tmp is a different filesystem, and we'd have to fall back to
copying the files which is a waste of time. Put the temp directory under
the WORKDIR to prevent that from being a problem.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
[RP: Add needed mkdirhier call]
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
When using devtool modify on the kernel, we have to do a bit of a dance
with tinfoil instances because we only find out that we're working on a
kernel recipe after tinfoil is initialised, but then we need to build
kern-tools-native which we're doing just by running bitbake directly.
With the tinfoil2 changes, a datastore for the recipe that we were
keeping around across the opening and closing of tinfoil is no longer
able to be used. Re-parse the recipe to avoid this problem.
(In future this whole thing will be able to be done in the same tinfoil
instance thanks to tinfoil2, but that refactoring is yet to be done.)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
getVar() now defaults to expanding by default, thus remove the True
option from getVar() calls with a regex search and replace.
Search made with the following regex: getVar ?\(( ?[^,()]*), True\)
Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <joshua.g.lock@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Using the setVariable commands here followed by buildFile will result in
"basehash mismatch" errors, and that's expected since we are deviating
*at runtime* from what was previously seen by changing these variable
values. Set BB_HASH_IGNORE_MISMATCH to turn off the errors.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Extracting the source for a recipe (as used by devtool's extract, modify
and upgrade subcommands) requires us to run do_fetch, do_unpack,
do_patch and any tasks that the recipe has inserted inbetween, and do so
with a modified datastore primarily so that we can redirect WORKDIR and
STAMPS_DIR in order to have the files written out to a place of our
choosing and avoid stamping the tasks as having executed in a real build
context respectively. However, this all gets much more difficult when in
memres mode since we can't call internal functions such as
bb.build.exec_func() directly - instead we need to execute the tasks on
the server. To do this we use the buildFile command which already exists
for the purpose of supporting bitbake -b, and setVariable commands to
set up the appropriate datastore.
(I did look at passing the modified datastore to the buildFile command
instead of using setVar() on the main datastore, however its use of
databuilder makes that very difficult, and we'd also need a different
method of getting the changes in the datastore over to the worker as
well.)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
If PATCHTOOL is "git", and PATCH_COMMIT_FUNCTIONS is set to "1", for
additional tasks between do_unpack and do_patch, make a git commit. This
logic was previously implemented in devtool itself, but it makes more
sense for it to be implemented in the patch class since that's where the
rest of the logic is for this (or in lib/oe/patch.py). It also makes
it possible for this to work with tinfoil2.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Use Tinfoil.parse_recipe_file() and Tinfoil.parse_recipe() instead of
the recipeutils equivalents, and replace any local duplicate
implementations. This not only tidies up the code but also allows these
calls to work in memres mode.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
The hello-mod recipe is unusual in that it has only local files in
SRC_URI and builds these out of ${WORKDIR}. When you use devtool modify
on it, devtool puts all of those files in an "oe-local-files"
subdirectory of the source tree, which is not ${S} (or ${B}) any more
and thus building the recipe afterwards fails. It's a bit of a hack, but
symlink the files in oe-local-files into the source tree (and commit the
symlinks with an ignored commit so that the repo is clean) to work
around the problem. We only do this at time of extraction, so any files
added to or removed from oe-local-files after that won't be handled, but
I think there's a limit to how far we should go to support these kinds
of recipes - ultimately they are anomalies.
I initially tried a hacky workaround where I set effectively set B =
"${WORKDIR}" and that allowed it to build, but other things such as the
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM checks still broke because they expected to find files
in ${S}. Another hack where I set the sourcetree to point to the
oe-local-files subdirectory works for hello-mod but not for makedevs
since whilst that is similar, unlike hello-mod it does in fact have
files in the source tree (since it has a patch that adds COPYING) and
thus the same issue occurred.
Also tweak one of the tests that tries devtool modify / update-recipe on
the makedevs recipe to try building it since that would have caught this
issue.
Fixes [YOCTO #10616].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
If you have a patch remotely fetched in a recipe (e.g. from an http
server) that needs updating then add a local version and substitute the
entry in SRC_URI to point to it.
One can argue about how desirable it is to be modifying patches fetched
in this way, but then one can argue about how desirable it is to have
such patches in the recipe in the first place - and in any case if
devtool update-recipe is to correctly transfer changes to such patches
made in the git repository within the source tree to the recipe then
there isn't much choice but to do it this way.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
It is possible to use gzip or bzip2 to compress patches and still refer
to them in compressed form in the SRC_URI value within a recipe. If you
run "devtool modify" on such a recipe, make changes to the commit for
the patch and then run devtool update-recipe, we need to correctly
associate the commit back to the compressed patch file and re-compress
the patch, neither of which we were doing previously.
Additionally, add an oe-selftest test to ensure this doesn't regress in
future.
Fixes [YOCTO #8278].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
