| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files |
|---|
|
Signed-off-by: Bogdan Marinescu <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The overrides virtclass-native and virtclass-nativesdk are deprecated,
which should be replaced by class-native and class-nativesdk.
[YOCTO #3297]
Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Nothing should ever be poking files directly into the staging/sysroot
directories, it should always go through ${D}.
This patch ensures this recipe does this and hence fixes various
potential build issues such as lack of sstate tracking of files.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
The line 'sed -i "s+${WORKDIR}+${STAGING_INCDIR}+g" tclConfig.sh'
is commented somehow in previous commit, so that TCL_SRC_DIR
point to the tcl workdir which will cause package that use it
fail to configure or compile when the tcl workdir is removed,
so uncomment it back.
Signed-off-by: Jackie Huang <jackie.huang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
tclConfig.sh is changed in do_install for cross compile and
is installed to STAGING_BINDIR_CROSS, but if SSTATE_DIR is set
and tcl is from sstage, tclConfig.sh can't be found in
STAGING_BINDIR_CROSS, add ${bindir_crossscripts}/tclConfig.sh
to sysroot stage can fix it.
[YOCTO #2891]
Signed-off-by: Jackie Huang <jackie.huang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
TCL_INCLUDE_SPEC -I/usr/include will cause problems cross configure/compile
TCL_LIB_SPEC -L${libdir} will cause problems too when link.
Signed-off-by: Yao Zhao <yao.zhao@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
the builddir is put in front of the LD_LIBRARY_PATH, causing dynamically
linking of target library with native tclsh.
Fix this behavior to cross build tcl correctly.
This issue got exposed when eglibc-2.15 was configured for the target.
Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
WARNING: QA Issue: tcl-lib: /work/i586-poky-linux/tcl-8.5.11-r4/packages-split/tcl-lib/usr/lib/libtcl8.5.so contains probably-redundant RPATH /usr/lib
WARNING: QA Issue: tcl: /work/i586-poky-linux/tcl-8.5.11-r4/packages-split/tcl/usr/bin/tclsh contains probably-redundant RPATH /usr/lib
WARNING: QA Issue: tcl: /work/i586-poky-linux/tcl-8.5.11-r4/packages-split/tcl/usr/bin/tclsh8.5 contains probably-redundant RPATH /usr/lib
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Fix an issue in the previous commit:
ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'tcl-native-lib-native' (but virtual:native:/srv/home/pokybuild/yocto-autobuilder/yocto-slave/nightly/build/meta/recipes-devtools/tcltk/tcl_8.5.11.bb RDEPENDS on or otherwise requires it)
NOTE: Runtime target 'tcl-native-lib-native' is unbuildable, removing.
by replacing ${PN}-lib with tcl-lib
Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Include /usr/lib/tcl8 for the msgcat and test module, force dependency on tcl-lib since shlibs isn't picking it up.
Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This is a quick audit of only the most obviously wrong licenses
found within OECore. These fixes fall into four areas:
- LICENSE field had incorrect format so that the parser choked
- LICENSE field has a license with no version
- LICENSE field was actually incorrect
- LICENSE field has an imaginary license that didn't exist
This fixes most of the LICENSE warnings thrown, along with my prior
commit adding additional licenses to common-licenses and additional
SPDXLICENSEMAP entries.
HOWEVER..... there is much to be done on the license front.
For a list of recipes with licenses that need obvious fixing see:
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/License_Audit
That said, I would suggest another license audit as I've found
enough inconsistencies. A good suggestion is when in doubt, look at
how openSuse or Gentoo or Debian license the package.
Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
