Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files |
|
These tools are not currently used for anything, but we should
still provide working versions of them.
[YOCTO #11400]
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
[YOCTO #11180]
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The rpm 5 has a rpm-build package, so here should use RPROVIDES rather
than PROVIDES to keep compatibility.
Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
rpm 5.x was packaging build tools separately, so we need to unbreak
things that relied on that.
[YOCTO #11167]
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
|
|
The dnf stack is written and tested against rpm 4.x. So if we want to use dnf for packaging,
we should also use rpm 4 - there's simply too much work involved in making rpm 5 work with it due
to significant API differences, and supporting that going forward.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
|