diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'meta/packages/prelink/prelink-20061027')
| -rw-r--r-- | meta/packages/prelink/prelink-20061027/armfix.patch | 67 |
1 files changed, 67 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/meta/packages/prelink/prelink-20061027/armfix.patch b/meta/packages/prelink/prelink-20061027/armfix.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..87767b9cc7 --- /dev/null +++ b/meta/packages/prelink/prelink-20061027/armfix.patch @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@ +Index: prelink-0.0.20061027/src/arch-arm.c +=================================================================== +--- prelink-0.0.20061027.orig/src/arch-arm.c 2008-06-04 19:41:07.000000000 +0100 ++++ prelink-0.0.20061027/src/arch-arm.c 2008-06-04 19:41:59.000000000 +0100 +@@ -145,13 +145,12 @@ + error (0, 0, "%s: R_ARM_PC24 relocs with non-zero addend should not be present in prelinked REL sections", + dso->filename); + return 1; +- /* DTPOFF32, DTPMOD32 and TPOFF32 is impossible to predict unless prelink +- sets the rules. Also for DTPOFF32/TPOFF32 there is REL->RELA problem. */ ++ /* DTPMOD32 is impossible to predict unless prelink sets the rules. ++ DTPOFF32/TPOFF32 are converted REL->RELA. */ + case R_ARM_TLS_DTPOFF32: +- if (dso->ehdr.e_type == ET_EXEC) +- error (0, 0, "%s: R_ARM_TLS_DTPOFF32 relocs should not be present in prelinked ET_EXEC REL sections", ++ error (0, 0, "%s: R_ARM_TLS_DTPOFF32 relocs should not be present in prelinked REL section", + dso->filename); +- break; ++ return 1; + case R_ARM_TLS_DTPMOD32: + if (dso->ehdr.e_type == ET_EXEC) + { +@@ -161,9 +160,11 @@ + } + break; + case R_ARM_TLS_TPOFF32: +- if (dso->ehdr.e_type == ET_EXEC) ++ if (dso->ehdr.e_type == ET_EXEC) { + error (0, 0, "%s: R_ARM_TLS_TPOFF32 relocs should not be present in prelinked ET_EXEC REL sections", + dso->filename); ++ return 1; ++ } + break; + case R_ARM_COPY: + if (dso->ehdr.e_type == ET_EXEC) +@@ -216,8 +217,7 @@ + (read_ule32 (dso, rela->r_offset) & 0xff000000) | val); + break; + case R_ARM_TLS_DTPOFF32: +- if (dso->ehdr.e_type == ET_EXEC) +- write_le32 (dso, rela->r_offset, value + rela->r_addend); ++ write_le32 (dso, rela->r_offset, value + rela->r_addend); + break; + /* DTPMOD32 and TPOFF32 are impossible to predict unless prelink + sets the rules. */ +@@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ + && (conflict->reloc_class != RTYPE_CLASS_TLS + || conflict->lookup.tls == NULL)) + { +- error (0, 0, "%s: R_386_TLS not resolving to STT_TLS symbol", ++ error (0, 0, "%s: R_ARM_TLS not resolving to STT_TLS symbol", + dso->filename); + return 1; + } +@@ -637,8 +637,11 @@ + case R_ARM_PC24: + return 1; + case R_ARM_TLS_DTPOFF32: ++ /* We can prelink these fields, and the addend is relative ++ to the symbol value. A RELA entry is needed. */ ++ return 1; + case R_ARM_TLS_TPOFF32: +- /* In shared libraries {D,}TPOFF32 is changed always into ++ /* In shared libraries TPOFF32 is changed always into + conflicts, for executables we need to preserve + original addend. */ + if (dso->ehdr.e_type == ET_EXEC) { |