elfutils: upgrade to 0.160

- Upgrade elfutils to 0.160

- Move 0.148 patches from elfutils to elfutils-0.148

- Drop 0.158 patches that got from debain, so far debian
  doesn't provide patches for 0.160 (the latest is 0.159)

- Move fixheadercheck.patch from 0.159 to 0.160

- We choose to use 0.159 patches from debian for the current 0.160
  which located in elfutils-0.160
  1) Rebase the following patches from 0.159 to 0.160
     hppa_backend.diff
     arm_backend.diff
     mips_backend.diff
     m68k_backend.diff
     arm_func_value.patch
     arm_unwind_ret_mask.patch

  2) Rebase redhat-portability.diff according to
     commit 52a6d20519870103134166d91e22d21fd736195d
     Author: Roxana Ciobanu <roxana.ciobanu@intel.com>
     Date:   Tue Jul 1 17:17:00 2014 +0300
       elfutils/elfutils-native: Fix patching generated files

  3) Drop the following patches which have already beem merged to 0.160
     arm_unsupported.patch
     arm_syscall.patch
     unaligned.patch
     aarch64-run-native-test-fix.patch

Signed-off-by: Hongxu Jia <hongxu.jia@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>

1 files changed, 24 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/elfutils/elfutils-0.160/fixheadercheck.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/elfutils/elfutils-0.160/fixheadercheck.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..8796e9a394
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/elfutils/elfutils-0.160/fixheadercheck.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+For some binaries we can get a invalid section alignment, for example if 
+sh_align = 1 and sh_addralign is 0. In the case of a zero size section like 
+".note.GNU-stack", this is irrelavent as far as I can tell and we shouldn't
+error in this case.
+
+RP 2014/6/11
+
+Upstream-Status: Pending
+
+Index: elfutils-0.158/libelf/elf32_updatenull.c
+===================================================================
+--- elfutils-0.158.orig/libelf/elf32_updatenull.c	2012-12-14 22:40:48.000000000 +0000
++++ elfutils-0.158/libelf/elf32_updatenull.c	2014-06-11 16:35:43.417386291 +0000
+@@ -327,8 +327,8 @@
+ 		     we test for the alignment of the section being large
+ 		     enough for the largest alignment required by a data
+ 		     block.  */
+-		  if (unlikely (! powerof2 (shdr->sh_addralign))
+-		      || unlikely (shdr->sh_addralign < sh_align))
++		  if (shdr->sh_size && (unlikely (! powerof2 (shdr->sh_addralign))
++		      || unlikely (shdr->sh_addralign < sh_align)))
+ 		    {
+ 		      __libelf_seterrno (ELF_E_INVALID_ALIGN);
+ 		      return -1;