summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/meta/classes
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRichard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>2016-01-15 12:44:10 +0000
committerRichard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>2016-01-19 16:35:37 +0000
commitebee3caeaa18daf4974ea90e264d64467681f57a (patch)
tree19c1a2ab3dbeab0f831f88100c7426e764662e21 /meta/classes
parentaafe22fb5f2f58e1e7206a34f410e9cae0d3cfe3 (diff)
downloadopenembedded-core-ebee3caeaa18daf4974ea90e264d64467681f57a.tar.gz
openembedded-core-ebee3caeaa18daf4974ea90e264d64467681f57a.tar.bz2
openembedded-core-ebee3caeaa18daf4974ea90e264d64467681f57a.zip
insane: Clean up horrible return value processing code
Whilst in theory return values are nice, handling the complex aggregation of the return values is ugly. The code already uses QA_SANE as a marker to signal problems. Whilst that isn't as idealistic, it makes the code massively cleaner, so rely on this instead. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'meta/classes')
-rw-r--r--meta/classes/insane.bbclass55
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 39 deletions
diff --git a/meta/classes/insane.bbclass b/meta/classes/insane.bbclass
index ba9c6511fd..70d5fb828d 100644
--- a/meta/classes/insane.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/insane.bbclass
@@ -779,15 +779,12 @@ def package_qa_walk(path, warnfuncs, errorfuncs, skip, package, d):
for e in errors:
package_qa_handle_error(e, errors[e], d)
- return len(errors) == 0
-
def package_qa_check_rdepends(pkg, pkgdest, skip, taskdeps, packages, d):
# Don't do this check for kernel/module recipes, there aren't too many debug/development
# packages and you can get false positives e.g. on kernel-module-lirc-dev
if bb.data.inherits_class("kernel", d) or bb.data.inherits_class("module-base", d):
- return True
+ return
- sane = True
if not "-dbg" in pkg and not "packagegroup-" in pkg and not "-image" in pkg:
localdata = bb.data.createCopy(d)
localdata.setVar('OVERRIDES', pkg)
@@ -801,10 +798,10 @@ def package_qa_check_rdepends(pkg, pkgdest, skip, taskdeps, packages, d):
for rdepend in rdepends:
if "-dbg" in rdepend and "debug-deps" not in skip:
error_msg = "%s rdepends on %s" % (pkg,rdepend)
- sane = package_qa_handle_error("debug-deps", error_msg, d)
+ package_qa_handle_error("debug-deps", error_msg, d)
if (not "-dev" in pkg and not "-staticdev" in pkg) and rdepend.endswith("-dev") and "dev-deps" not in skip:
error_msg = "%s rdepends on %s" % (pkg, rdepend)
- sane = package_qa_handle_error("dev-deps", error_msg, d)
+ package_qa_handle_error("dev-deps", error_msg, d)
if rdepend not in packages:
rdep_data = oe.packagedata.read_subpkgdata(rdepend, d)
if rdep_data and 'PN' in rdep_data and rdep_data['PN'] in taskdeps:
@@ -822,7 +819,7 @@ def package_qa_check_rdepends(pkg, pkgdest, skip, taskdeps, packages, d):
if rdep_data and 'PN' in rdep_data and rdep_data['PN'] in taskdeps:
continue
error_msg = "%s rdepends on %s, but it isn't a build dependency?" % (pkg, rdepend)
- sane = package_qa_handle_error("build-deps", error_msg, d)
+ package_qa_handle_error("build-deps", error_msg, d)
if "file-rdeps" not in skip:
ignored_file_rdeps = set(['/bin/sh', '/usr/bin/env', 'rtld(GNU_HASH)'])
@@ -889,19 +886,15 @@ def package_qa_check_rdepends(pkg, pkgdest, skip, taskdeps, packages, d):
for key in filerdepends:
error_msg = "%s contained in package %s requires %s, but no providers found in its RDEPENDS" % \
(filerdepends[key],pkg, key)
- sane = package_qa_handle_error("file-rdeps", error_msg, d)
-
- return sane
+ package_qa_handle_error("file-rdeps", error_msg, d)
def package_qa_check_deps(pkg, pkgdest, skip, d):
- sane = True
localdata = bb.data.createCopy(d)
localdata.setVar('OVERRIDES', pkg)
bb.data.update_data(localdata)
def check_valid_deps(var):
- sane = True
try:
rvar = bb.utils.explode_dep_versions2(localdata.getVar(var, True) or "")
except ValueError as e:
@@ -910,24 +903,14 @@ def package_qa_check_deps(pkg, pkgdest, skip, d):
for v in rvar[dep]:
if v and not v.startswith(('< ', '= ', '> ', '<= ', '>=')):
error_msg = "%s_%s is invalid: %s (%s) only comparisons <, =, >, <=, and >= are allowed" % (var, pkg, dep, v)
- sane = package_qa_handle_error("dep-cmp", error_msg, d)
- return sane
-
- sane = True
- if not check_valid_deps('RDEPENDS'):
- sane = False
- if not check_valid_deps('RRECOMMENDS'):
- sane = False
- if not check_valid_deps('RSUGGESTS'):
- sane = False
- if not check_valid_deps('RPROVIDES'):
- sane = False
- if not check_valid_deps('RREPLACES'):
- sane = False
- if not check_valid_deps('RCONFLICTS'):
- sane = False
+ package_qa_handle_error("dep-cmp", error_msg, d)
- return sane
+ check_valid_deps('RDEPENDS')
+ check_valid_deps('RRECOMMENDS')
+ check_valid_deps('RSUGGESTS')
+ check_valid_deps('RPROVIDES')
+ check_valid_deps('RREPLACES')
+ check_valid_deps('RCONFLICTS')
QAPATHTEST[expanded-d] = "package_qa_check_expanded_d"
def package_qa_check_expanded_d(path,name,d,elf,messages):
@@ -1072,9 +1055,6 @@ python do_package_qa () {
taskdeps.add(taskdepdata[dep][0])
g = globals()
- walk_sane = True
- rdepends_sane = True
- deps_sane = True
for package in packages:
skip = (d.getVar('INSANE_SKIP_' + package, True) or "").split()
if skip:
@@ -1099,19 +1079,16 @@ python do_package_qa () {
"%s doesn't match the [a-z0-9.+-]+ regex" % package, d)
path = "%s/%s" % (pkgdest, package)
- if not package_qa_walk(path, warnchecks, errorchecks, skip, package, d):
- walk_sane = False
- if not package_qa_check_rdepends(package, pkgdest, skip, taskdeps, packages, d):
- rdepends_sane = False
- if not package_qa_check_deps(package, pkgdest, skip, d):
- deps_sane = False
+ package_qa_walk(path, warnchecks, errorchecks, skip, package, d)
+ package_qa_check_rdepends(package, pkgdest, skip, taskdeps, packages, d)
+ package_qa_check_deps(package, pkgdest, skip, d)
if 'libdir' in d.getVar("ALL_QA", True).split():
package_qa_check_libdir(d)
qa_sane = d.getVar("QA_SANE", True)
- if not walk_sane or not rdepends_sane or not deps_sane or not qa_sane:
+ if not qa_sane:
bb.fatal("QA run found fatal errors. Please consider fixing them.")
bb.note("DONE with PACKAGE QA")
}