diff options
author | Chong Lu <Chong.Lu@windriver.com> | 2014-06-10 18:13:39 +0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> | 2014-06-13 12:31:34 +0100 |
commit | c8722b510f779cd20757477a7f7a7a2a35b9a9c5 (patch) | |
tree | 8a6d9162ba7d3e4cb6cbb2f33966d2373f002ae1 | |
parent | 4fa57b42aa7ec3f77606ab3d3b5814f638c859d5 (diff) | |
download | openembedded-core-c8722b510f779cd20757477a7f7a7a2a35b9a9c5.tar.gz openembedded-core-c8722b510f779cd20757477a7f7a7a2a35b9a9c5.tar.bz2 openembedded-core-c8722b510f779cd20757477a7f7a7a2a35b9a9c5.zip |
kexec-tools: Refine kdump device_tree sort
The commit b02d735bf was to rearrange the device-tree entries, and
assumed that these entries are sorted in the ascending order. but
acctually when I was validating kexec and kdump, the order of
serial node still is changed. So the patch is to sort these entries
by the directory name in ascending order.
Signed-off-by: Yang Wei <Wei.Yang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Chong Lu <Chong.Lu@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
-rw-r--r-- | meta/recipes-kernel/kexec/kexec-tools.inc | 3 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | meta/recipes-kernel/kexec/kexec-tools/kexec-tools-Refine-kdump-device_tree-sort.patch | 82 |
2 files changed, 84 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/kexec/kexec-tools.inc b/meta/recipes-kernel/kexec/kexec-tools.inc index 50b448caed..6a690c6a7e 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/kexec/kexec-tools.inc +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/kexec/kexec-tools.inc @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=ea5bed2f60d357618ca161ad539f7c0a \ file://kexec/kexec.c;beginline=1;endline=20;md5=af10f6ae4a8715965e648aa687ad3e09" DEPENDS = "zlib xz" -SRC_URI = "${KERNELORG_MIRROR}/linux/utils/kernel/kexec/kexec-tools-${PV}.tar.gz" +SRC_URI = "${KERNELORG_MIRROR}/linux/utils/kernel/kexec/kexec-tools-${PV}.tar.gz \ + file://kexec-tools-Refine-kdump-device_tree-sort.patch" inherit autotools-brokensep diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/kexec/kexec-tools/kexec-tools-Refine-kdump-device_tree-sort.patch b/meta/recipes-kernel/kexec/kexec-tools/kexec-tools-Refine-kdump-device_tree-sort.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..ab1fe96db2 --- /dev/null +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/kexec/kexec-tools/kexec-tools-Refine-kdump-device_tree-sort.patch @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ +kexec-tools: Refine kdump device_tree sort + +The commit b02d735bf was to rearrange the device-tree entries, and +assumed that these entries are sorted in the ascending order. but +acctually when I was validating kexec and kdump, the order of +serial node still is changed. So the patch is to sort these entries +by the directory name in ascending order. + +Upstream-Status: Pending + +Signed-off-by: Yang Wei <Wei.Yang@windriver.com> +Signed-off-by: Chong Lu <Chong.Lu@windriver.com> +--- + kexec/arch/ppc/fs2dt.c | 13 ++++++++++--- + kexec/fs2dt.c | 13 ++++++++++--- + 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/kexec/arch/ppc/fs2dt.c b/kexec/arch/ppc/fs2dt.c +index 4121c7d..cc04b04 100644 +--- a/kexec/arch/ppc/fs2dt.c ++++ b/kexec/arch/ppc/fs2dt.c +@@ -296,6 +296,9 @@ static int comparefunc(const void *dentry1, const void *dentry2) + { + char *str1 = (*(struct dirent **)dentry1)->d_name; + char *str2 = (*(struct dirent **)dentry2)->d_name; ++ char* ptr1 = strchr(str1, '@'); ++ char* ptr2 = strchr(str2, '@'); ++ int len1, len2; + + /* + * strcmp scans from left to right and fails to idetify for some +@@ -303,9 +306,13 @@ static int comparefunc(const void *dentry1, const void *dentry2) + * Therefore, we get the wrong sorted order like memory@10000000 and + * memory@f000000. + */ +- if (strchr(str1, '@') && strchr(str2, '@') && +- (strlen(str1) > strlen(str2))) +- return 1; ++ if (ptr1 && ptr2) { ++ len1 = ptr1 - str1; ++ len2 = ptr2 - str2; ++ if (!strncmp(str1, str2, len1 >len2 ? len1: len2) && ++ (strlen(str1) > strlen(str2))) ++ return 1; ++ } + + return strcmp(str1, str2); + } +diff --git a/kexec/fs2dt.c b/kexec/fs2dt.c +index 5e6b98d..1c0345b 100644 +--- a/kexec/fs2dt.c ++++ b/kexec/fs2dt.c +@@ -475,6 +475,9 @@ static int comparefunc(const struct dirent **dentry1, + { + char *str1 = (*(struct dirent **)dentry1)->d_name; + char *str2 = (*(struct dirent **)dentry2)->d_name; ++ char* ptr1 = strchr(str1, '@'); ++ char* ptr2 = strchr(str2, '@'); ++ int len1, len2; + + /* + * strcmp scans from left to right and fails to idetify for some +@@ -482,9 +485,13 @@ static int comparefunc(const struct dirent **dentry1, + * Therefore, we get the wrong sorted order like memory@10000000 and + * memory@f000000. + */ +- if (strchr(str1, '@') && strchr(str2, '@') && +- (strlen(str1) > strlen(str2))) +- return 1; ++ if (ptr1 && ptr2) { ++ len1 = ptr1 - str1; ++ len2 = ptr2 - str2; ++ if (!strncmp(str1, str2, len1 >len2 ? len1: len2) && ++ (strlen(str1) > strlen(str2))) ++ return 1; ++ } + + return strcmp(str1, str2); + } +-- +1.7.9.5 + |