diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'packages/binutils/binutils-2.16.91.0.7/binutils-uclibc-702-binutils-skip-comments.patch')
| -rw-r--r-- | packages/binutils/binutils-2.16.91.0.7/binutils-uclibc-702-binutils-skip-comments.patch | 93 |
1 files changed, 93 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/packages/binutils/binutils-2.16.91.0.7/binutils-uclibc-702-binutils-skip-comments.patch b/packages/binutils/binutils-2.16.91.0.7/binutils-uclibc-702-binutils-skip-comments.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..9ef7a7c9ec --- /dev/null +++ b/packages/binutils/binutils-2.16.91.0.7/binutils-uclibc-702-binutils-skip-comments.patch @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ +Retrieved from http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2004-04/msg00646.html +Fixes +localealias.s:544: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `,' +when building glibc-2.3.2 with gcc-3.4.0 and binutils-2.15.90.0.3 + +Paths adjusted to match crosstool's patcher. + +Message-Id: m3n052qw2g.fsf@whitebox.m5r.de +From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de> +To: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com> +Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at wasabisystems dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com +Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 22:27:19 +0200 +Subject: Re: demand_empty_rest_of_line and ignore_rest_of_line + +Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com> writes: + +> Index: read.c +> =================================================================== +> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gas/read.c,v +> retrieving revision 1.76 +> diff -c -3 -p -r1.76 read.c +> *** read.c 12 Mar 2004 17:48:12 -0000 1.76 +> --- read.c 18 Mar 2004 09:56:05 -0000 +> *************** read_a_source_file (char *name) +> *** 1053,1059 **** +> #endif +> input_line_pointer--; +> /* Report unknown char as ignored. */ +> ! ignore_rest_of_line (); +> } +> +> #ifdef md_after_pass_hook +> --- 1053,1059 ---- +> #endif +> input_line_pointer--; +> /* Report unknown char as ignored. */ +> ! demand_empty_rest_of_line (); +> } +> +> #ifdef md_after_pass_hook + +This means that the unknown character is no longer ignored, despite the +comment. As a side effect a line starting with a line comment character +not followed by APP in NO_APP mode now triggers an error instead of just a +warning, breaking builds of glibc on m68k-linux. Earlier in +read_a_source_file where #APP is handled there is another comment that +claims that unknown comments are ignored, when in fact they aren't (only +the initial line comment character is skipped). + +Note that the presence of #APP will mess up the line counters, but +that appears to be difficult to fix. + +Andreas. + +2004-04-23 Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> + + * read.c (read_a_source_file): Ignore unknown text after line + comment character. Fix misleading comment. + +--- binutils/gas/read.c.~1.78.~ 2004-04-23 08:58:23.000000000 +0200 ++++ binutils/gas/read.c 2004-04-23 21:49:01.000000000 +0200 +@@ -950,10 +950,14 @@ read_a_source_file (char *name) + unsigned int new_length; + char *tmp_buf = 0; + +- bump_line_counters (); + s = input_line_pointer; + if (strncmp (s, "APP\n", 4)) +- continue; /* We ignore it */ ++ { ++ /* We ignore it */ ++ ignore_rest_of_line (); ++ continue; ++ } ++ bump_line_counters (); + s += 4; + + sb_new (&sbuf); +@@ -1052,7 +1056,7 @@ read_a_source_file (char *name) + continue; + #endif + input_line_pointer--; +- /* Report unknown char as ignored. */ ++ /* Report unknown char as error. */ + demand_empty_rest_of_line (); + } + + +-- +Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de +SuSE Linux AG, MaxfeldstraÃe 5, 90409 NÃrnberg, Germany +Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 +"And now for something completely different." |