diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | packages/gcc/files/gfortran.patch | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | packages/gcc/gcc-4.3.1/gfortran.patch | 40 |
2 files changed, 1 insertions, 41 deletions
diff --git a/packages/gcc/files/gfortran.patch b/packages/gcc/files/gfortran.patch index 96905e5d7d..0c42851ce1 100644 --- a/packages/gcc/files/gfortran.patch +++ b/packages/gcc/files/gfortran.patch @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Index: gcc-4.2.1/gcc/fortran/trans-types.c + + /* Handle TImode as a special case because it is used by some backends + (eg. ARM) even though it is not available for normal use. */ -+#if HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT >= 64 ++#if HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT >= 65 + if (bits == TYPE_PRECISION (intTI_type_node)) + return intTI_type_node; +#endif diff --git a/packages/gcc/gcc-4.3.1/gfortran.patch b/packages/gcc/gcc-4.3.1/gfortran.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 0c42851ce1..0000000000 --- a/packages/gcc/gcc-4.3.1/gfortran.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,40 +0,0 @@ -The patch below fixes a crash building libgfortran on arm-linux-gnueabi. - -This target doesn't really have a 128-bit integer type, however it does use -TImode to represent the return value of certain special ABI defined library -functions. This results in type_for_size(TImode) being called. - -Because TImode deosn't correspond to any gfortran integer kind -gfc_type_for_size returns NULL and we segfault shortly after. - -The patch below fixes this by making gfc_type_for_size handle TImode in the -same way as the C frontend. - -Tested on x86_64-linux and arm-linux-gnueabi. -Applied to trunk. - -Paul - -2007-05-15 Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com> - - gcc/fortran/ - * trans-types.c (gfc_type_for_size): Handle signed TImode. - -Index: gcc-4.2.1/gcc/fortran/trans-types.c -=================================================================== ---- gcc-4.2.1/gcc/fortran/trans-types.c (revision 170435) -+++ gcc-4.2.1/gcc/fortran/trans-types.c (working copy) -@@ -1800,6 +1800,13 @@ gfc_type_for_size (unsigned bits, int un - if (type && bits == TYPE_PRECISION (type)) - return type; - } -+ -+ /* Handle TImode as a special case because it is used by some backends -+ (eg. ARM) even though it is not available for normal use. */ -+#if HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT >= 65 -+ if (bits == TYPE_PRECISION (intTI_type_node)) -+ return intTI_type_node; -+#endif - } - else - { |