rename packages/ to recipes/ per earlier agreement

See links below for more details:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.handhelds.openembedded/21326
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.handhelds.openembedded/21816

Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>
Acked-by: Mike Westerhof <mwester@dls.net>
Acked-by: Philip Balister <philip@balister.org>
Acked-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Marcin Juszkiewicz <hrw@openembedded.org>
Acked-by: Koen Kooi <koen@openembedded.org>
Acked-by: Frans Meulenbroeks <fransmeulenbroeks@gmail.com>

1 files changed, 179 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/recipes/gcc/gcc-4.3.2/debian/pr30961.dpatch b/recipes/gcc/gcc-4.3.2/debian/pr30961.dpatch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..b20fdf5bf5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/recipes/gcc/gcc-4.3.2/debian/pr30961.dpatch
@@ -0,0 +1,179 @@
+#! /bin/sh -e
+
+# DP: <your description>
+
+dir=
+if [ $# -eq 3 -a "$2" = '-d' ]; then
+    pdir="-d $3"
+    dir="$3/"
+elif [ $# -ne 1 ]; then
+    echo >&2 "`basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument"
+    exit 1
+fi
+case "$1" in
+    -patch)
+        patch $pdir -f --no-backup-if-mismatch -p0 < $0
+        ;;
+    -unpatch)
+        patch $pdir -f --no-backup-if-mismatch -R -p0 < $0
+        ;;
+    *)
+        echo >&2 "`basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument"
+        exit 1
+esac
+exit 0
+
+From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
+Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
+To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
+Subject: PATCH: PR target/30961: [4.1/4.2/4.3 regression] redundant reg/mem 	stores/moves
+Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:34:12 -0700
+
+We start with
+
+(note:HI 3 4 22 2 NOTE_INSN_FUNCTION_BEG)
+
+(insn:HI 6 3 10 2 c.c:3 (set (reg:DF 58 [ <result> ])
+        (subreg:DF (reg/v:DI 59 [ in ]) 0)) 102 {*movdf_integer_rex64} (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg/v:DI 59 [ in ])
+        (nil)))
+
+(insn:HI 10 6 16 2 c.c:7 (set (reg/i:DF 21 xmm0 [ <result> ])
+        (reg:DF 58 [ <result> ])) 102 {*movdf_integer_rex64} (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:DF 58 [ <result> ])
+        (nil)))
+
+(insn:HI 16 10 0 2 c.c:7 (use (reg/i:DF 21 xmm0 [ <result> ])) -1 (nil))
+
+we are trying to allocate registers for insn 6 and we allocate
+xmm0 for the return value. Reload doesn't check if xmm0 can be used for
+DF 59, it allocates xmm1 for DF 59 and generates:
+
+Reloads for insn # 6
+Reload 0: reload_in (DF) = (reg:DF 5 di)
+        SSE_REGS, RELOAD_FOR_INPUT (opnum = 1), can't combine
+        reload_in_reg: (subreg:DF (reg/v:DI 5 di [orig:59 in ] [59]) 0)
+        reload_reg_rtx: (reg:DF 22 xmm1)
+...
+
+(note:HI 4 1 3 2 [bb 2] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK)
+
+(note:HI 3 4 22 2 NOTE_INSN_FUNCTION_BEG)
+
+(insn 22 3 23 2 c.c:3 (set (mem/c:DF (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 7 sp)
+                (const_int -8 [0xfffffffffffffff8])) [0 S8 A8])
+        (reg:DF 5 di)) 102 {*movdf_integer_rex64} (nil))
+
+(insn 23 22 6 2 c.c:3 (set (reg:DF 22 xmm1)
+        (mem/c:DF (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 7 sp)
+                (const_int -8 [0xfffffffffffffff8])) [0 S8 A8])) 102 {*movdf_integer_rex64} (nil))
+
+(insn:HI 6 23 16 2 c.c:3 (set (reg:DF 21 xmm0 [orig:58 <result> ] [58])
+        (reg:DF 22 xmm1)) 102 {*movdf_integer_rex64} (nil))
+
+(insn 16 6 21 2 c.c:7 (use (reg/i:DF 21 xmm0 [ <result> ])) -1 (nil))
+
+This patch tries to use the destination register when reloading for input. It
+generates
+
+Reloads for insn # 6
+Reload 0: reload_in (DF) = (reg:DF 5 di)
+        SSE_REGS, RELOAD_FOR_INPUT (opnum = 1), can't combine
+        reload_in_reg: (subreg:DF (reg/v:DI 5 di [orig:59 in ] [59]) 0)
+        reload_reg_rtx: (reg:DF 21 xmm0)
+...
+(note:HI 4 1 3 2 [bb 2] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK)
+
+(note:HI 3 4 22 2 NOTE_INSN_FUNCTION_BEG)
+
+(insn 22 3 23 2 c.c:3 (set (mem/c:DF (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 7 sp)
+                (const_int -8 [0xfffffffffffffff8])) [0 S8 A8])
+        (reg:DF 5 di)) 102 {*movdf_integer_rex64} (nil))
+
+(insn 23 22 6 2 c.c:3 (set (reg:DF 21 xmm0)
+        (mem/c:DF (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 7 sp)
+                (const_int -8 [0xfffffffffffffff8])) [0 S8 A8])) 102 {*movdf_integer_rex64} (nil))
+
+(insn:HI 6 23 10 2 c.c:3 (set (reg:DF 22 xmm1 [orig:58 <result> ] [58])
+        (reg:DF 21 xmm0)) 102 {*movdf_integer_rex64} (nil))
+
+(insn:HI 10 6 16 2 c.c:7 (set (reg/i:DF 21 xmm0 [ <result> ])
+        (reg:DF 22 xmm1 [orig:58 <result> ] [58])) 102 {*movdf_integer_rex64} (nil))
+
+(insn 16 10 21 2 c.c:7 (use (reg/i:DF 21 xmm0 [ <result> ])) -1 (nil))
+
+
+H.J.
+----
+gcc/
+
+2007-08-27  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
+
+	PR target/30961
+	* reload1.c (find_reg): Favor the hard register in destination
+	if it is usable and a memory location is needed for reload
+	input.
+
+gcc/testsuite/
+
+2007-08-27  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
+
+	PR target/30961
+	* gcc.target/i386/pr30961-1.c: New.
+
+--- gcc/reload1.c.second	2007-08-27 09:35:08.000000000 -0700
++++ gcc/reload1.c	2007-08-27 09:36:33.000000000 -0700
+@@ -1781,6 +1781,20 @@ find_reg (struct insn_chain *chain, int 
+   HARD_REG_SET not_usable;
+   HARD_REG_SET used_by_other_reload;
+   reg_set_iterator rsi;
++#ifdef SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED
++  rtx body = PATTERN (chain->insn);
++  unsigned int dest_reg = FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER;
++
++  if (GET_CODE (body) == SET)
++    {
++      rtx dest = SET_DEST (body);
++
++      if ((REG_P (dest)
++	   || (GET_CODE (dest) == SUBREG
++	       && REG_P (SUBREG_REG (dest)))))
++	dest_reg = reg_or_subregno (dest);
++    }
++#endif
+ 
+   COPY_HARD_REG_SET (not_usable, bad_spill_regs);
+   IOR_HARD_REG_SET (not_usable, bad_spill_regs_global);
+@@ -1821,6 +1835,18 @@ find_reg (struct insn_chain *chain, int 
+ 	    this_cost--;
+ 	  if (rl->out && REG_P (rl->out) && REGNO (rl->out) == regno)
+ 	    this_cost--;
++#ifdef SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED
++	  /* If a memory location is needed for rl->in and dest_reg
++	     is usable, we will favor it.  */
++	  else if (dest_reg == regno
++		   && rl->in
++		   && REG_P (rl->in)
++		   && REGNO (rl->in) < FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER
++		   && SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED (REGNO_REG_CLASS (REGNO (rl->in)),
++					       rl->class,
++					       rl->mode))
++	    this_cost = 0;
++#endif
+ 	  if (this_cost < best_cost
+ 	      /* Among registers with equal cost, prefer caller-saved ones, or
+ 		 use REG_ALLOC_ORDER if it is defined.  */
+--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr30961-1.c.second	2007-08-27 11:01:59.000000000 -0700
++++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr30961-1.c	2007-08-27 11:02:51.000000000 -0700
+@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
++/* { dg-do compile } */
++/* { dg-require-effective-target lp64 } */
++/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
++
++double
++convert (long long in)
++{
++  double f;
++  __builtin_memcpy( &f, &in, sizeof( in ) );
++  return f;
++}
++
++/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "movapd" } } */