summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/recipes/cacao/files
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRobert Schuster <thebohemian@gmx.net>2009-03-19 17:56:46 +0100
committerRobert Schuster <thebohemian@gmx.net>2009-03-20 00:55:13 +0100
commitcf5fb3e95fbb247670b8bc4d094ea23c7141441f (patch)
tree392ea3a201f96dc189a059aae40b610e2302892a /recipes/cacao/files
parent7ad21b9e93306874eb33ced7bef83cf3a1b80980 (diff)
cacao 0.99.3: Added patch for PR 99.
Diffstat (limited to 'recipes/cacao/files')
-rw-r--r--recipes/cacao/files/cacao-codegen-arm3.patch98
1 files changed, 98 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/recipes/cacao/files/cacao-codegen-arm3.patch b/recipes/cacao/files/cacao-codegen-arm3.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..0480e2bf34
--- /dev/null
+++ b/recipes/cacao/files/cacao-codegen-arm3.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+
+# HG changeset patch
+# User Michael Starzinger <michi@complang.tuwien.ac.at>
+# Date 1219071051 -7200
+# Node ID 560d90393144976fb3a4e25c6ab6c5bba6c24945
+# Parent 3f50e293a509895992c2781322f2199a481a87a2
+Fixed PR99 (hopefully).
+* src/vm/jit/arm/codegen.h (M_RECOMPUTE_IP): Shifted sub instructions go
+first now (order of instruction reveresed).
+* src/vm/jit/arm/md.h (md_codegen_get_pv_from_pc): Only load additional
+instructions if definitely allowed to. This was made possible by
+above change.
+
+--- a/src/vm/jit/arm/codegen.h Mon Aug 18 16:03:26 2008 -0400
++++ b/src/vm/jit/arm/codegen.h Mon Aug 18 16:50:51 2008 +0200
+@@ -1103,15 +1103,22 @@
+ /* M_RECOMPUTE_PV:
+ used to recompute our PV (we use the IP for this) out of the current PC
+ ATTENTION: if you change this, you have to look at other functions as well!
+- Following things depend on it: asm_call_jit_compiler(); codegen_findmethod();
++ Following things depend on it: md_codegen_get_pv_from_pc();
+ */
+ #define M_RECOMPUTE_PV(disp) \
+ disp += 8; /* we use PC relative addr. */ \
+ assert((disp & 0x03) == 0); \
+ assert(disp >= 0 && disp <= 0x03ffffff); \
+- M_SUB_IMM(REG_PV, REG_PC, IMM_ROTL(disp >> 2, 1)); \
+- if (disp > 0x000003ff) M_SUB_IMM(REG_PV, REG_PV, IMM_ROTL(disp >> 10, 5)); \
+- if (disp > 0x0003ffff) M_SUB_IMM(REG_PV, REG_PV, IMM_ROTL(disp >> 18, 9)); \
++ if (disp > 0x0003ffff) { \
++ M_SUB_IMM(REG_PV, REG_PC, IMM_ROTL(disp >> 18, 9)); \
++ M_SUB_IMM(REG_PV, REG_PV, IMM_ROTL(disp >> 10, 5)); \
++ M_SUB_IMM(REG_PV, REG_PV, IMM_ROTL(disp >> 2, 1)); \
++ } else if (disp > 0x000003ff) { \
++ M_SUB_IMM(REG_PV, REG_PC, IMM_ROTL(disp >> 10, 5)); \
++ M_SUB_IMM(REG_PV, REG_PV, IMM_ROTL(disp >> 2, 1)); \
++ } else { \
++ M_SUB_IMM(REG_PV, REG_PC, IMM_ROTL(disp >> 2, 1)); \
++ }
+
+ /* M_INTMOVE:
+ generates an integer-move from register a to b.
+--- a/src/vm/jit/arm/md.h Mon Aug 18 16:03:26 2008 -0400
++++ b/src/vm/jit/arm/md.h Mon Aug 18 16:50:51 2008 +0200
+@@ -68,29 +68,37 @@
+ {
+ uint32_t* pc;
+ uintptr_t pv;
+- uint32_t mcode1, mcode2, mcode3;
++ uint32_t mcode;
++ int mcode_idx;
+
+ pc = (uint32_t*) ra;
+ pv = (uintptr_t) ra;
+
+ /* this can either be a RECOMPUTE_IP in JIT code or a fake in asm_calljavafunction */
+- mcode1 = pc[0];
+- if ((mcode1 & 0xffffff00) == 0xe24fcf00 /*sub ip,pc,#__*/)
+- pv -= (uintptr_t) ((mcode1 & 0x000000ff) << 2);
+- else if ((mcode1 & 0xffffff00) == 0xe24fc000 /*sub ip,pc,#__*/)
+- pv -= (uintptr_t) (mcode1 & 0x000000ff);
++ mcode_idx = 0;
++ mcode = pc[0];
++
++ /* if this was shifted by 18 bits, we have to load additional instructions */
++ if ((mcode & 0xfff0ff00) == 0xe240c700 /*sub ip,??,#__*/) {
++ pv -= (uintptr_t) ((mcode & 0x000000ff) << 18);
++ mcode = pc[++mcode_idx];
++ }
++
++ /* if this was shifted by 10 bits, we have to load additional instructions */
++ if ((mcode & 0xfff0ff00) == 0xe240cb00 /*sub ip,??,#__*/) {
++ pv -= (uintptr_t) ((mcode & 0x000000ff) << 10);
++ mcode = pc[++mcode_idx];
++ }
++
++ /* this is the default path with just one instruction, shifted by 2 or no bits */
++ if ((mcode & 0xfff0ff00) == 0xe240cf00 /*sub ip,??,#__*/)
++ pv -= (uintptr_t) ((mcode & 0x000000ff) << 2);
++ else if ((mcode & 0xffffff00) == 0xe24fc000 /*sub ip,pc,#__*/)
++ pv -= (uintptr_t) (mcode & 0x000000ff);
+ else {
+ /* if this happens, we got an unexpected instruction at (*ra) */
+- vm_abort("Unable to find method: %p (instr=%x)", ra, mcode1);
++ vm_abort("Unable to find method: %p (instr=%x)", ra, mcode);
+ }
+-
+- /* if we have a RECOMPUTE_IP there can be more than one instruction */
+- mcode2 = pc[1];
+- mcode3 = pc[2];
+- if ((mcode2 & 0xffffff00) == 0xe24ccb00 /*sub ip,ip,#__*/)
+- pv -= (uintptr_t) ((mcode2 & 0x000000ff) << 10);
+- if ((mcode3 & 0xffffff00) == 0xe24cc700 /*sub ip,ip,#__*/)
+- pv -= (uintptr_t) ((mcode3 & 0x000000ff) << 18);
+
+ /* we used PC-relative adressing; but now it is LR-relative */
+ pv += 8;
+