diff options
author | Robert Schuster <thebohemian@gmx.net> | 2009-03-19 17:56:46 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Robert Schuster <thebohemian@gmx.net> | 2009-03-20 00:55:13 +0100 |
commit | cf5fb3e95fbb247670b8bc4d094ea23c7141441f (patch) | |
tree | 392ea3a201f96dc189a059aae40b610e2302892a /recipes/cacao/files | |
parent | 7ad21b9e93306874eb33ced7bef83cf3a1b80980 (diff) |
cacao 0.99.3: Added patch for PR 99.
Diffstat (limited to 'recipes/cacao/files')
-rw-r--r-- | recipes/cacao/files/cacao-codegen-arm3.patch | 98 |
1 files changed, 98 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/recipes/cacao/files/cacao-codegen-arm3.patch b/recipes/cacao/files/cacao-codegen-arm3.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..0480e2bf34 --- /dev/null +++ b/recipes/cacao/files/cacao-codegen-arm3.patch @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@ + +# HG changeset patch +# User Michael Starzinger <michi@complang.tuwien.ac.at> +# Date 1219071051 -7200 +# Node ID 560d90393144976fb3a4e25c6ab6c5bba6c24945 +# Parent 3f50e293a509895992c2781322f2199a481a87a2 +Fixed PR99 (hopefully). +* src/vm/jit/arm/codegen.h (M_RECOMPUTE_IP): Shifted sub instructions go +first now (order of instruction reveresed). +* src/vm/jit/arm/md.h (md_codegen_get_pv_from_pc): Only load additional +instructions if definitely allowed to. This was made possible by +above change. + +--- a/src/vm/jit/arm/codegen.h Mon Aug 18 16:03:26 2008 -0400 ++++ b/src/vm/jit/arm/codegen.h Mon Aug 18 16:50:51 2008 +0200 +@@ -1103,15 +1103,22 @@ + /* M_RECOMPUTE_PV: + used to recompute our PV (we use the IP for this) out of the current PC + ATTENTION: if you change this, you have to look at other functions as well! +- Following things depend on it: asm_call_jit_compiler(); codegen_findmethod(); ++ Following things depend on it: md_codegen_get_pv_from_pc(); + */ + #define M_RECOMPUTE_PV(disp) \ + disp += 8; /* we use PC relative addr. */ \ + assert((disp & 0x03) == 0); \ + assert(disp >= 0 && disp <= 0x03ffffff); \ +- M_SUB_IMM(REG_PV, REG_PC, IMM_ROTL(disp >> 2, 1)); \ +- if (disp > 0x000003ff) M_SUB_IMM(REG_PV, REG_PV, IMM_ROTL(disp >> 10, 5)); \ +- if (disp > 0x0003ffff) M_SUB_IMM(REG_PV, REG_PV, IMM_ROTL(disp >> 18, 9)); \ ++ if (disp > 0x0003ffff) { \ ++ M_SUB_IMM(REG_PV, REG_PC, IMM_ROTL(disp >> 18, 9)); \ ++ M_SUB_IMM(REG_PV, REG_PV, IMM_ROTL(disp >> 10, 5)); \ ++ M_SUB_IMM(REG_PV, REG_PV, IMM_ROTL(disp >> 2, 1)); \ ++ } else if (disp > 0x000003ff) { \ ++ M_SUB_IMM(REG_PV, REG_PC, IMM_ROTL(disp >> 10, 5)); \ ++ M_SUB_IMM(REG_PV, REG_PV, IMM_ROTL(disp >> 2, 1)); \ ++ } else { \ ++ M_SUB_IMM(REG_PV, REG_PC, IMM_ROTL(disp >> 2, 1)); \ ++ } + + /* M_INTMOVE: + generates an integer-move from register a to b. +--- a/src/vm/jit/arm/md.h Mon Aug 18 16:03:26 2008 -0400 ++++ b/src/vm/jit/arm/md.h Mon Aug 18 16:50:51 2008 +0200 +@@ -68,29 +68,37 @@ + { + uint32_t* pc; + uintptr_t pv; +- uint32_t mcode1, mcode2, mcode3; ++ uint32_t mcode; ++ int mcode_idx; + + pc = (uint32_t*) ra; + pv = (uintptr_t) ra; + + /* this can either be a RECOMPUTE_IP in JIT code or a fake in asm_calljavafunction */ +- mcode1 = pc[0]; +- if ((mcode1 & 0xffffff00) == 0xe24fcf00 /*sub ip,pc,#__*/) +- pv -= (uintptr_t) ((mcode1 & 0x000000ff) << 2); +- else if ((mcode1 & 0xffffff00) == 0xe24fc000 /*sub ip,pc,#__*/) +- pv -= (uintptr_t) (mcode1 & 0x000000ff); ++ mcode_idx = 0; ++ mcode = pc[0]; ++ ++ /* if this was shifted by 18 bits, we have to load additional instructions */ ++ if ((mcode & 0xfff0ff00) == 0xe240c700 /*sub ip,??,#__*/) { ++ pv -= (uintptr_t) ((mcode & 0x000000ff) << 18); ++ mcode = pc[++mcode_idx]; ++ } ++ ++ /* if this was shifted by 10 bits, we have to load additional instructions */ ++ if ((mcode & 0xfff0ff00) == 0xe240cb00 /*sub ip,??,#__*/) { ++ pv -= (uintptr_t) ((mcode & 0x000000ff) << 10); ++ mcode = pc[++mcode_idx]; ++ } ++ ++ /* this is the default path with just one instruction, shifted by 2 or no bits */ ++ if ((mcode & 0xfff0ff00) == 0xe240cf00 /*sub ip,??,#__*/) ++ pv -= (uintptr_t) ((mcode & 0x000000ff) << 2); ++ else if ((mcode & 0xffffff00) == 0xe24fc000 /*sub ip,pc,#__*/) ++ pv -= (uintptr_t) (mcode & 0x000000ff); + else { + /* if this happens, we got an unexpected instruction at (*ra) */ +- vm_abort("Unable to find method: %p (instr=%x)", ra, mcode1); ++ vm_abort("Unable to find method: %p (instr=%x)", ra, mcode); + } +- +- /* if we have a RECOMPUTE_IP there can be more than one instruction */ +- mcode2 = pc[1]; +- mcode3 = pc[2]; +- if ((mcode2 & 0xffffff00) == 0xe24ccb00 /*sub ip,ip,#__*/) +- pv -= (uintptr_t) ((mcode2 & 0x000000ff) << 10); +- if ((mcode3 & 0xffffff00) == 0xe24cc700 /*sub ip,ip,#__*/) +- pv -= (uintptr_t) ((mcode3 & 0x000000ff) << 18); + + /* we used PC-relative adressing; but now it is LR-relative */ + pv += 8; + |