gcc 4.2.4, 4.2.4: fix bug #4893

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 40 deletions

diff --git a/packages/gcc/gcc-4.2.4/gfortran.patch b/packages/gcc/gcc-4.2.4/gfortran.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 96905e5d7d..0000000000
--- a/packages/gcc/gcc-4.2.4/gfortran.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,40 +0,0 @@
-The patch below fixes a crash building libgfortran on arm-linux-gnueabi.
-
-This target doesn't really have a 128-bit integer type, however it does use 
-TImode to represent the return value of certain special ABI defined library 
-functions. This results in type_for_size(TImode) being called.
-
-Because TImode deosn't correspond to any gfortran integer kind 
-gfc_type_for_size returns NULL and we segfault shortly after.
-
-The patch below fixes this by making gfc_type_for_size handle TImode in the 
-same way as the C frontend.
-
-Tested on x86_64-linux and arm-linux-gnueabi.
-Applied to trunk.
-
-Paul
-
-2007-05-15  Paul Brook  <paul@codesourcery.com>
-
-	gcc/fortran/
-	* trans-types.c (gfc_type_for_size): Handle signed TImode.
-
-Index: gcc-4.2.1/gcc/fortran/trans-types.c
-===================================================================
---- gcc-4.2.1/gcc/fortran/trans-types.c	(revision 170435)
-+++ gcc-4.2.1/gcc/fortran/trans-types.c	(working copy)
-@@ -1800,6 +1800,13 @@ gfc_type_for_size (unsigned bits, int un
- 	  if (type && bits == TYPE_PRECISION (type))
- 	    return type;
- 	}
-+
-+      /* Handle TImode as a special case because it is used by some backends
-+         (eg. ARM) even though it is not available for normal use.  */
-+#if HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT >= 64
-+      if (bits == TYPE_PRECISION (intTI_type_node))
-+	return intTI_type_node;
-+#endif
-     }
-   else
-     {