From 8ba336d0fb86ec8eff65d39ef1db2ca8950f158f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Laurentiu Palcu Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 15:36:59 +0300 Subject: tar: upgrade to 1.27 Refreshed remove-gets.patch to apply correctly. Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Palcu Signed-off-by: Saul Wold --- meta/recipes-extended/tar/tar-1.26/remove-gets.patch | 20 -------------------- 1 file changed, 20 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/tar/tar-1.26/remove-gets.patch (limited to 'meta/recipes-extended/tar/tar-1.26/remove-gets.patch') diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/tar/tar-1.26/remove-gets.patch b/meta/recipes-extended/tar/tar-1.26/remove-gets.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 2429d429ae..0000000000 --- a/meta/recipes-extended/tar/tar-1.26/remove-gets.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,20 +0,0 @@ -ISO C11 removes the specification of gets() from the C language, eglibc 2.16+ removed it - -Signed-off-by: Khem Raj - -Upstream-Status: Pending -Index: tar-1.26/gnu/stdio.in.h -=================================================================== ---- tar-1.26.orig/gnu/stdio.in.h 2011-03-12 01:14:33.000000000 -0800 -+++ tar-1.26/gnu/stdio.in.h 2012-07-04 12:18:58.997081535 -0700 -@@ -163,8 +163,10 @@ - /* It is very rare that the developer ever has full control of stdin, - so any use of gets warrants an unconditional warning. Assume it is - always declared, since it is required by C89. */ -+#if defined gets - #undef gets - _GL_WARN_ON_USE (gets, "gets is a security hole - use fgets instead"); -+#endif - - #if @GNULIB_FOPEN@ - # if @REPLACE_FOPEN@ -- cgit v1.2.3