Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files |
|
This should have been register_commands rather than register_command;
I used register_commands in devtool so lets change this here to be
consistent with that. (Since this is extensible through layers though we
need to remain compatible with the old name, so fall back to that if the
new function name isn't there.)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Add a recipetool subcommand "setvar" to set a variable in a file. This
uses our existing logic such that it doesn't matter if the variable is
already set in the recipe, if it's set in the recipe or some inc file,
and if the variable is not currently set that the line setting the
variable gets inserted in the right place in the file.
Implements [YOCTO #7676].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Use bb.utils.edit_metadata() to replace some of the logic in this
function; this avoids us effectively having two implementations of the
same thing. In the process fix the following issues:
* Insert values before any leading comments for the next variable
instead of after them
* Insert overridden variables (e.g. RDEPENDS_${PN}) in the correct place
* Properly handle replacing varflag settings (e.g. SRC_URI[md5sum])
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
* Make some minor clarifications to help text
* Drop ArgumentDefaultsHelpFormatter and just put the defaults in the
text itself where needed (because otherwise you get defaults shown for
store_true options which is somewhat confusing).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Enable access to the configuration object in register_commands() so that
we can read configuration values there; this allows us to show the
task that will be run in the command line help for the build subcommand.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Use a bbappend file to set PARALLEL_MAKE instead of a postfile; this
is a bit neater and only affects the specified recipe.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
This is just belt-and-braces but we ought to use try..finally in this
kind of situation, so just do it.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Print the SUMMARY value for each matched item assuming it's not the
default.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
This function is no longer required to be defined for a plugin, so drop
it where it's a no-op.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Rather than reconstructing the output path for packages, use the proper
variable.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
For subcommands that don't actually involve the workspace, don't
auto-create the workspace.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
If you're upgrading a git recipe to a revision on a release branch
that's different to the branch for the current revision, then you'll
need to update the branch parameter in SRC_URI, so add a --srcbranch/-B
command-line parameter to let you do that easily. It handles both when
the branch is stated verbatim in the recipe, and when a reference to
another variable is used (a common convention is to use a SRCBRANCH
variable for this, though the code doesn't care what variable is used
if any).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
If we're upgrading a recipe that fetches from git, and we've simply
fetched a tarball of the repo instead of directly from the upstream repo
(this can happen if you have PREMIRRORS set up as in poky with a core recipe,
e.g. kernelshark) then we won't have any new revisions, and the checkout
will fail with "fatal: reference is not a tree: <hash>". To avoid this,
do a "git fetch" before checking out the new revision.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
If we're upgrading a git recipe the recipe file usually won't need
renaming; for some unknown reason we were throwing an error here which
isn't correct.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
This code was clearly never tested. Fix the following issues:
* Actually set SRCREV if it's been specified
* Enable history tracking and reparse so that we handle if variables are
set in an inc file next to the recipe
* Use a more accurate check for PV being in the recipe which will work
if it's in an inc file next to the recipe
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
If you did a "devtool add" followed by "devtool upgrade" and then did
a "devtool reset" on the recipe you upgraded, the first recipe would
also be deleted from the workspace - this was because we were
erroneously adding the entire "recipes" subdirectory and its contents to
be tracked for removal on reset. Remove the unnecessary call to
os.path.dirname() that caused this.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
The external source of kernel has been patched during the
construction of git repository. Include the do_patch task in the
SRCTREECOVEREDTASKS.
Signed-off-by: Tzu-Jung Lee <roylee17@currantlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Wic runs some tools through pseudo, which makes exec_native_cmd
to fail and throw cryptic error message when tool is not baked:
For example:
Error: exec_cmd: 'export
PSEUDO_PREFIX=/media/ssd/poky-build/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr;export
PSEUDO_LOCALSTATEDIR=/media/ssd/poky-build/tmp/work/qemux86-poky-linux/
...
PSEUDO_PASSWD=/media/ssd/poky-build/tmp/work/qemux86-poky-linux/ ...
PSEUDO_NOSYMLINKEXP=1;/media/ssd/poky-build/tmp/sysroots/ ...
mkfs.ext4 -F -i 8192 /var/tmp/wic/build/rootfs_platform.7.ext4 -L
platform -d
/media/ssd/poky-build/tmp/work/qemux86-poky-linux/core-image-minimal/...
returned '1' instead of 0
Made exec_native_cmd aware of pseudo and properly report
errors when command is not found.
Signed-off-by: Ed Bartosh <ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
The sync command is similar to the extract command, except it
fetches the sync'ed and patched branch to an existing git repository.
This enables users to keep track the upstream development while
maintaining their own local git repository at the same time.
Signed-off-by: Tzu-Jung Lee <roylee17@currantlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Apparently bb.fetch.URI can't handle this at the moment.
Signed-off-by: Christopher Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Previously exec_native_cmd() would remove all items from PATH except for
the native sysroot. This can cause issues for the tools that are created
using create_wrapper().
Now instead of wiping out the PATH, run a sanity check to check if the
command is in the native sysroot.
Signed-off-by: Randy Witt <randy.e.witt@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
For modify / extract / upgrade, if the specified "recipe" is not
actually a recipe but a virtual target such as virtual/kernel, map it
correctly to the actual recipe and make sure we use that name within the
workspace. Thanks to Chris Larson for reminding me this was still broken
and for a hint on how to fix it.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
If recipe parsing fails we need to exit out instead of attempting to use
the data object that's set to None, which resulted in a traceback.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
If the directory specified by --extract-to exists, because we were using
shutil.move() to move the temporary extracted directory to the specified
path, a subdirectory was being created under that directory instead of
moving the contents, which was a different result than if the directory
didn't previously exist. We could try to always move the contents but
that's complicated when any symlinks are involved; the simplest thing is
just to remove the directory (which should be empty anyway) before
moving the temporary directory across in its place.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Use "git cherry" against the original tag that we made when we extracted
the source in order to find the revisions that are definitely new. This
allows you to modify a commit in the middle of the series and then run
devtool update-recipe and not have the subsequent patches unnecessarily
modified.
Fixes [YOCTO #8388].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The name of the directory for local source files under srctree is
'oe-local-files', not 'local-files'. Fixes a bug that slipped through
in b7ab82485e4514e07ab8a76e554da27ddc92e6c0.
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Enable variable history tracking so that the variables are updated in
the correct file - i.e. in the file they are already defined.
[YOCTO #7715]
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This change makes it possible to have local files (non-remote SRC_URI
files, i.e. files that are located in the "recipe space") under the
srctree even if S!=WORKDIR. The files must be placed under the
'local-files' subdirectory.
Complements the previous patch that imports local files into srctree.
[YOCTO #7602]
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
|
|
* extract: Copy all local source files (i.e. non-compressed/non-arcived
SRC_URI files that have file:// URI prefix) - excluding patches - to
the srctree repository. The files will be placed in a subdirectory
called 'oe-local-files'. The oe-local-files directory is not committed
to the Git repository, but, marked to be ignored by a .gitignore file.
The developer can manually add and commit the files to Git if the
changes to them need to be tracked.
Before this patch, local source files (were copied (and committed) to
the srctree repository only in some special cases (basically when
S=WORKDIR) when doing devtool-extract. For most of the packages local
files were not copied at all.
* update-recipe: This patch causes the local files to be 'synced' from
the srctree (i.e. from the 'oe-local-files' subdirectory) to the
layer. Being 'synced' means that in addition to copying modified
files over the original sources, devtool will also handle removing and
adding local source files and updating the recipe accordingly. We
don't want to create patches against the local source files but rather
update them directly. Thus, 'oe-local-file' directory is ignored in
patch generation when doing update-recipe, even if committed to Git.
This functionality is only enabled if the 'oe-local-files' directory
is present in srctree.
[YOCTO #7602]
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Helper function for replacing a pattern like:
target_dir = os.path.dirname(target)
bb.utils.mkdirhier(target_dir)
shutil.move(source, target)
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Implement new function that handles patch file generation. The new
function also does the discovery of new, updated and deleted patches.
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
|
|
When adding multiple new patches append them to SRC_URI in correct order
so that they apply correctly.
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Rename fails over filesystem boundaries.
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
We only need the base configuration to get the variable values we want
to get here, there's no need to parse recipes / load the cache.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Do not change change current working directory permanently, but, only
for the duration of tinfoil initialization instead. The previous fix
caused very unintuitive behavior where using relative paths were solved
with respect to the builddir instead of the current working directory.
E.g. calling "devtool extract zlib ./zlib" would always create create
srctree in ${TOPDIR}/zlib, independent of the users cwd.
(From OE-Core rev: 4c7f159b0e17a0475a4a4e9dc4dd012e3d2e6a1f)
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Adds a subcommand to search to find the target recipe name providing
some file or capability. This is implemented by searching on recipe
name, package name, description, package contents (file names), and
runtime file provides. For example:
$ devtool search libGL
mesa
$ devtool search X11
xextproto
libxxf86vm
xf86driproto
xf86vidmodeproto
libxfixes
xproto
libx11
...
$ devtool search /bin/sed
busybox
sed
This is particularly useful within the extensible SDK but is also made
available in devtool alongside the build system.
Note of course that because this searches pkgdata, useful results depend
upon do_packagedata(_setscene) having executed for the recipe being
searched for.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
We ship the runqemu script and if we build QEMU itself within the
extensible SDK, then it would be nice to be able to run it. This is a
very thin wrapper around runqemu, supplying the machine and image name
so the user doesn't need to. (This subcommand is only available within
the extensible SDK since it only really makes sense there where it is
otherwise hard to run runqemu directly.)
Implements [YOCTO #6657].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Add a means of creating recipes for package files or archives that
contain a directory structure to be installed verbatim, for example an
rpm file. (We mostly just re-use bin_package here and skip some of the
normal build system checks.) This support is available in "recipetool
create" and "devtool add" which wraps the former.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Upon further reflection, it seems to me that this bbappend ought to just
be deleted at the end of the build. This keeps things simple; you never
have to remember to delete any files to get back to where you were
before with the image. This means we can also drop the slightly awkward
message reminding the user how to do that. I've also updated the test to
look at the image manifest to determine if the command has worked
instead of looking for the (now deleted) bbappend.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
* Make image optional for the extensible SDK (auto-determine it based on
the targets the SDK was built for)
* Check that specified recipe is in fact an image
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If the user is running "devtool build-image" within the extensible SDK
then they probably won't know where to find the resulting output files,
so we should tell them explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
We build recipes and include packages into the image, adjust the
terminology used in code and messages accordingly. Also fix a few typos.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If we end up printing a message about the build directory being the same
as the source, we should print that first and then print the message
about the recipe file possibly needing to be edited to the end so that
it has slightly more impact.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If the fetched source isn't already a git repository, initialise it as
one and then branch and tag, just as we do with "devtool modify". This
makes it easier to make changes, commit them and then use the
"devtool update-recipe" command to turn those commits into patches
on the recipe.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Some recipes don't extract any source (for example, opkg-keyrings). We
were producing a traceback in this case because we weren't checking if
the directory existed.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Recipes that use work-shared (such as libgcc) are capable of unpacking
the source, but it doesn't necessarily unpack to ${WORKDIR}/${BP}. Use
the last part of the actual S value instead which is more likely to
work.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
unpack task
If you try to use "devtool modify -x" or "devtool extract" on a recipe
where do_unpack has been set as noexec (e.g. glibc-locale), then we get
an error because the expected source wasn't ever unpacked. Do a check up
front for noexec being set on do_unpack and error out with a reasonable
message if that's the case.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The # character in a URI denotes a fragment; we don't care about this
since it is never supposed to be sent to the server, so remove it from
the URI before actually trying to fetch it or use it in SRC_URI within
the recipe.
(This has come up because download links on pypi.python.org seem to have
a fragment containing the md5sum of the download; without stripping this
off the fetcher will choke on it.)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The shell considers empty functions to be a syntax error, so for
template shell functions that contain only comments (or no lines at all)
then add a : to act as a no-op which avoids the syntax error.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
When we were adding a recipe for software that would typically be built
in the same directory as the source, we were always using a separate
build directory unless the user explicitly specified not to, leading to
errors for software that doesn't expect to be built that way (such as
Python modules using distutils). Split out the code that makes this
determination automatically from the "devtool modify" and "devtool
upgrade" code and re-use that here so the behaviour is consistent.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|