| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files |
|---|
|
Fixed:
NOTE: make -j 32
make: *** No rule to make target `/path/to/sysroot/4.9.0/include/stddef.h', needed by `kexec/kexec.o'. Stop.
This happens when upgrade gcc from 4.9.0 to 4.9.1, and the kexec/kexec.d
isn't regenerated when recompile, the content of it are:
[snip]
kexec/kexec.o: /path/to/sysroot/4.9.0/include/stddef.h
[snip]
And Makefile includes the kexec/kexec.d file if it exists, so there
would be errors when /path/to/sysroot/4.9.0/include/stddef.h doesn't
exist.
Remove kexec/kexec.d and other similar files will fix the problem.
Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
kexec-tools-klibc required kexec-tools.inc file. Put the patch of
kexec-tools into bb file in order to fixing QA warning about files path.
The patch only needed by kexec-tools.
Signed-off-by: Chong Lu <Chong.Lu@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The commit b02d735bf was to rearrange the device-tree entries, and
assumed that these entries are sorted in the ascending order. but
acctually when I was validating kexec and kdump, the order of
serial node still is changed. So the patch is to sort these entries
by the directory name in ascending order.
Signed-off-by: Yang Wei <Wei.Yang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Chong Lu <Chong.Lu@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This patch goes through the OE-Core recipes and marks those which use autotools
but don't support a separate build directory (${S} != ${B}). A new class,
autotools-brokensep is used for this purpose.
This doesn't introduce any change in behaviour in its own right.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
kexec-tools optionally looks for the lzma code provided by xz. Since this
is generally useful for lzma compressed kernels, add the dependency and
make builds determinstic.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell <pb@pbcl.net>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Building sato-sdk for an x86_64 target throws this QA error:
| ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) on /work/x86_64-poky-li\
nux/kexec-tools-2.0.2-r1/packages-split/kexec-tools/usr/lib/kexec-tools/kexec_t\
est
kexec_test uses 32-bit code for testing - add an INSANE_SKIP exception for it.
Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
kexec does infact work and build on powerpc, enable the compatible
host for these machines
Signed-off-by: Matthew McClintock <msm@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
There doesn't appear to be any terribly good reason for kexec-tools to
depend on the kernel. (I verified that kexec-tools is buildable in a
clean TMPDIR without having previously built virtual/kernel.)
Having this dependency in place is a nuisance because it makes it
awkward to put kexec into an initramfs. So, it seems like we would be
better off without.
Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
In mirrors.bbclass we point into /pub but we don't in bitbake.conf.
All uses of KERNELORG_MIRROR look into /pub anyhow, so lets make
use of that.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <tom_rini@mentor.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <tom_rini@mentor.com>
|
|
Add missing SUMMARY and updated DESCRIPTION fields if necessary
Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
|
|
Remove the patch since the fix is already in latest upstream.
Signed-off-by: Dongxiao Xu <dongxiao.xu@intel.com>
|
|
Having one monolithic packages directory makes it hard to find things
and is generally overwhelming. This commit splits it into several
logical sections roughly based on function, recipes.txt gives more
information about the classifications used.
The opportunity is also used to switch from "packages" to "recipes"
as used in OpenEmbedded as the term "packages" can be confusing to
people and has many different meanings.
Not all recipes have been classified yet, this is just a first pass
at separating things out. Some packages are moved to meta-extras as
they're no longer actively used or maintained.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
