| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files |
|---|
|
recipes
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
A lot of our recipes had short one-line DESCRIPTION values and no
SUMMARY value set. In this case it's much better to just set SUMMARY
since DESCRIPTION is defaulted from SUMMARY anyway and then the SUMMARY
is at least useful. I also took the opportunity to fix up a lot of the
new SUMMARY values, making them concisely explain the function of the
recipe / package where possible.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
|
|
* we don't depends on bzip2, so make sure it's not autodetected in
sysroot
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Update the LFLAGS1 in the Makefile to remove warnings:
QA Issue: No GNU_HASH in the elf binary
Signed-off-by: Christopher Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Shakeel <muhammad_shakeel@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Makefile makes use of CFLAGS_NOOPT. If we set that
when calling make we can options like -g. The Makefile
will override any optimization to -O3.
Upstream-Status: Pending
Signed-off-by: Joe Slater <jslater@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
This is a quick audit of only the most obviously wrong licenses
found within OECore. These fixes fall into four areas:
- LICENSE field had incorrect format so that the parser choked
- LICENSE field has a license with no version
- LICENSE field was actually incorrect
- LICENSE field has an imaginary license that didn't exist
This fixes most of the LICENSE warnings thrown, along with my prior
commit adding additional licenses to common-licenses and additional
SPDXLICENSEMAP entries.
HOWEVER..... there is much to be done on the license front.
For a list of recipes with licenses that need obvious fixing see:
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/License_Audit
That said, I would suggest another license audit as I've found
enough inconsistencies. A good suggestion is when in doubt, look at
how openSuse or Gentoo or Debian license the package.
Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com>
|
|
This is the result of running the following over the metadata:
sed \
-e 's:bb.data.\(setVar([^,()]*,[^,()]*\), *\([^ )]*\) *):\2.\1):g' \
-e 's:bb.data.\(setVarFlag([^,()]*,[^,()]*,[^,()]*\), *\([^) ]*\) *):\2.\1):g' \
-e 's:bb.data.\(getVar([^,()]*\), *\([^(), ]*\) *,\([^)]*\)):\2.\1,\3):g' \
-e 's:bb.data.\(getVarFlag([^,()]*,[^,()]*\), *\([^(), ]*\) *,\([^)]*\)):\2.\1,\3):g' \
-e 's:bb.data.\(getVarFlag([^,()]*,[^,()]*\), *\([^() ]*\) *):\2.\1):g' \
-e 's:bb.data.\(getVar([^,()]*\), *\([^) ]*\) *):\2.\1):g' \
-i `grep -ril bb.data *`
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
