| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files |
|---|
|
Change Makefile to use LDFLAGS
Signed-off-by: Mikhail Durnev <Mikhail_Durnev@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
A lot of our recipes had short one-line DESCRIPTION values and no
SUMMARY value set. In this case it's much better to just set SUMMARY
since DESCRIPTION is defaulted from SUMMARY anyway and then the SUMMARY
is at least useful. I also took the opportunity to fix up a lot of the
new SUMMARY values, making them concisely explain the function of the
recipe / package where possible.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Makefile makes use of CFLAGS_NOOPT. If we set that
when calling make we can enable options like -g. The
Makefile will override any optimization to -O3.
Signed-off-by: Joe Slater <jslater@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
The overrides virtclass-native and virtclass-nativesdk are deprecated,
which should be replaced by class-native and class-nativesdk.
[YOCTO #3297]
Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
WARNING: For recipe unzip, the following files/directories were installed but not shipped in any package:
WARNING: /usr/man
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
This is a quick audit of only the most obviously wrong licenses
found within OECore. These fixes fall into four areas:
- LICENSE field had incorrect format so that the parser choked
- LICENSE field has a license with no version
- LICENSE field was actually incorrect
- LICENSE field has an imaginary license that didn't exist
This fixes most of the LICENSE warnings thrown, along with my prior
commit adding additional licenses to common-licenses and additional
SPDXLICENSEMAP entries.
HOWEVER..... there is much to be done on the license front.
For a list of recipes with licenses that need obvious fixing see:
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/License_Audit
That said, I would suggest another license audit as I've found
enough inconsistencies. A good suggestion is when in doubt, look at
how openSuse or Gentoo or Debian license the package.
Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com>
|
|
Not only do we have to override things on the make line, but we
need to hack on configure as well to avoid certain behavior.
Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
