| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files |
|---|
|
VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_init_manager
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
package lsbsetup has been dropped, so remove it from packagegroup
core-lsb.
Signed-off-by: Kang Kai <kai.kang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
LSB needs wget to download packages but wget provided by busybox doesn't
support some options such as '-N'.
LSB perl test 4.1.6-2 case all/tst_perlModPresent.pl,
../lib/Class/ISA/t/00_about_verbose and ../lib/Class/ISA/t/01_old_junk.t
fail because of lack of these modules, add them to make test pass.
File CORE/config.h which is provided by perl-dev and file
unicore/version which is provided by perl-doc are required by LSB perl
test cases.
Add perl-dev and perl-doc to packagegroups-core-lsb.
[Yocto #3030 #3031 #3052 #3054 #3055]
Signed-off-by: Kang Kai <kai.kang@windriver.com>
Rebased for packagegroup change -sgw
These perl libraries are being added directly to OE-Core for 4.1
LSB Complainace, when 5.0 comes out early next year (2013), we will
remove these changes.
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
These are needed to support upgrading from task-* to packagegroup-*
within existing target images at runtime.
Note: these settings will very likely be moved to a separate inc file
at some point in the future.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Allow references to the old task packages to continue to work. This does
not add RPROVIDES for everything, just those packages that are likely to
have been referred to.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Create package groups covering the Core, Desktop, Runtime Languages
sections of the LSB specification 4.1. Most of the packages were just
moved around or copied in from packagegroup-core-basic (which is
currently included in LSB images anyway) with the eventual aim of
having the LSB package groups be completely independent as well as
following the specification as closely as possible.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
* Remove packagegroup-core-basic-rpm - we already have a mechanism for
ensuring that packaging tools are installed on the target if desired;
we don't need a package group to bring them in as well (especially if
packagegroup-core-basic is used with other packaging systems).
* Remove the poorly-named packagegroup-core-base-utils: we already get
busybox via packagegroup-core-boot.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Since package groups don't actually fetch or distribute anything and we
no longer run do_configure we don't need to set this variable anymore.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Also clean out items already handled by that class (dev/dbg packages,
ALLOW_EMPTY, etc.)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
"Package group" is a much more appropriate name for these than task,
since we use the word task to describe units of work executed by
BitBake.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
