| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files |
|---|
|
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
LICENSE file was changed to match the BSD-2 Clause
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
|
|
The packaging changes to ncurses could break package feeds,
so bump the PR on everythong that DEPENDS on ncurses.
Signed-off-by: Scott Garman <scott.a.garman@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This slipped off my plate. Adding the email response from the
author of less which allows us to use a generic BSD instead of
the less license.
Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
I've asked and received permission from Mark Nudelman, the author
of less, to utilize a generic BSD 2 clause license for less, instead
of creating a common "less" license file.
Signed-off-by: Beth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This is a quick audit of only the most obviously wrong licenses
found within OECore. These fixes fall into four areas:
- LICENSE field had incorrect format so that the parser choked
- LICENSE field has a license with no version
- LICENSE field was actually incorrect
- LICENSE field has an imaginary license that didn't exist
This fixes most of the LICENSE warnings thrown, along with my prior
commit adding additional licenses to common-licenses and additional
SPDXLICENSEMAP entries.
HOWEVER..... there is much to be done on the license front.
For a list of recipes with licenses that need obvious fixing see:
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/License_Audit
That said, I would suggest another license audit as I've found
enough inconsistencies. A good suggestion is when in doubt, look at
how openSuse or Gentoo or Debian license the package.
Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
[YOCTO #860]
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Add Summary information and update descriptions as necessary.
Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Having one monolithic packages directory makes it hard to find things
and is generally overwhelming. This commit splits it into several
logical sections roughly based on function, recipes.txt gives more
information about the classifications used.
The opportunity is also used to switch from "packages" to "recipes"
as used in OpenEmbedded as the term "packages" can be confusing to
people and has many different meanings.
Not all recipes have been classified yet, this is just a first pass
at separating things out. Some packages are moved to meta-extras as
they're no longer actively used or maintained.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
