| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files |
|---|
|
Instead of building specifiaclly for native a static fork of unifdef from
2007, simply package the latest tarball.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
A lot of our recipes had short one-line DESCRIPTION values and no
SUMMARY value set. In this case it's much better to just set SUMMARY
since DESCRIPTION is defaulted from SUMMARY anyway and then the SUMMARY
is at least useful. I also took the opportunity to fix up a lot of the
new SUMMARY values, making them concisely explain the function of the
recipe / package where possible.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
|
|
The header in sourcefile says its BSD licensed
not GPL therefore make the correction
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Having one monolithic packages directory makes it hard to find things
and is generally overwhelming. This commit splits it into several
logical sections roughly based on function, recipes.txt gives more
information about the classifications used.
The opportunity is also used to switch from "packages" to "recipes"
as used in OpenEmbedded as the term "packages" can be confusing to
people and has many different meanings.
Not all recipes have been classified yet, this is just a first pass
at separating things out. Some packages are moved to meta-extras as
they're no longer actively used or maintained.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
