| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files |
|---|
|
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Changes required:
- Rename opkg-cl to opkg
- Add libarchive dependency
- Drop backport patches
- Drop obsolete directory options
- Add patch to handle empty index files
Based on initial work by Paul Barker.
Signed-off-by: Alejandro del Castillo <alejandro.delcastillo@ni.com>
CC: Paul Barker <paul@paulbarker.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
run-postinsts always mark ipk package management as true, causing
problems when try to execute opkg-cl and isn't present.
Signed-off-by: Aníbal Limón <anibal.limon@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
After removal of auto-creating S we must ensure that all recipes are
using a proper value for S.
Fix all recipes that only need to set S equals to WORKDIR.
[YOCTO #5627]
Signed-off-by: Petter Mabäcker <petter@technux.se>
|
|
The basic.target itself requires sysinit.target, so there's no
need to write this redundant line in the run-postinsts unit file.
Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The old implementation was wrong. It was not very generic and it checked
IMAGE_FEATURES while building the recipe, which led to various issues
with the generation of the final script. That is, the run-postinsts
script was generated once, while building the package for the first
time. Hence, any other changes to IMAGE_FEATURES, like removing/adding
'package-management' did not reflect in the final script.
This commit makes run-postinsts script autodetect the backend used for
creating the image, making it generic.
[YOCTO #5666]
[YOCTO #5972]
Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Palcu <laurentiu.palcu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Currently, opkg/dpkg have their own postinstalls that create a
run-postinsts script which is run at first boot.
This commit prepares the run-postinsts recipe/script to be used by
opkg/dpkg when DISTRO_FEATURES includes package-management.
[YOCTO #5666]
Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Palcu <laurentiu.palcu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This patch mainly adds a systmd service file for run-postinsts,
which is started at first boot to run the post-install scripts.
Apart from this, this patch also modifies the installation location
of run-postinsts to ${sbindir}. This is because this script would be
used by both sysvinit and systemd based images. So it's more reasonable
to make it locate under ${sbindir}.
[YOCTO #5719]
Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
If we enable ipk/deb package back-end, and we have 'package-management'
in our IMAGE_FEATURES, then the /etc/rcS.d/S99run-postinsts would
still exist in our system after a clean start-up.
The initial design for run-postinsts requires the related init script
to be removed if there's no more post-install script left in the system.
This patch fixes this problem.
[YOCTO #5718]
Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
A lot of our recipes had short one-line DESCRIPTION values and no
SUMMARY value set. In this case it's much better to just set SUMMARY
since DESCRIPTION is defaulted from SUMMARY anyway and then the SUMMARY
is at least useful. I also took the opportunity to fix up a lot of the
new SUMMARY values, making them concisely explain the function of the
recipe / package where possible.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Apparently, when opkg/dpkg and run-postinsts are installed in the same
time, opkg/dpkg postinstall overwrites the run-postinsts link in rcS.d.
This will make run-postinsts script useless and the delayed postinstalls
will not be run.
This issue happens only when 'package-management' is disabled and, in
the same time, dpkg/opkg ends up in the image: either pulled by some
dependency or manually installed.
With this patch, both opkg/dpkg and run-postinsts scripts will run but
the former will silently fail because the package metadata is removed from
the image since 'pacakge-management' is disabled.
[YOCTO #4484]
Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Palcu <laurentiu.palcu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
When all postinsts scripts succeed at system startup, it's very possible
that the log file /var/log/postinstall.log is empty. This is kind of
confusing, as that file is supposed to hold information about the postinsts.
Add more logging to the log file to make things clearer.
Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
The run-postinsts script also handles the #SYSCONFDIR#/rpm-postinsts
directory. Add it to the comment for clarity.
Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Fix a typo for stderr redirection.
Signed-off-by: Yi Zhao <yi.zhao@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
This recipe is used only when the package manager is not deployed on
target and there still are delayed postinstalls that need to be run on
target. At the moment, run-postinsts is targeted to dpkg/opkg. RPM uses another
recipe, called rpm-postinsts which, in turn, is used even when the rpm
package is deployed.
This patch intends to make run-postinsts generic and deprecate
rpm-postinsts. Here's why:
* when opkg/dpkg are not deplyed, the meta-data files are useless.
Hence, the awk script is not needed. The postinstall files are already
saved in /etc/(deb|ipk)-postinsts directory and we can use the same
procedure as in rpm's case;
Also, the recipe is moved out from meta/recipes-devel/dpkg to
meta/recipes-devel/run-postinsts.
Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Palcu <laurentiu.palcu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
