| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files |
|---|
|
Remove mempcpy patch its already in uclibc now
refresh libargp patch to match latest elfutils
Add ALLOW_EMPTY for musl
core-image-cmdline-full asks for elfutils package to be added to package
it has all eu-* tools but we dont build them on musl. nevertheless lets
satisfy the dependency so image can build for musl
Build libdw,libasm,libebl along with libelf
enhance the musl portability patch to compile every other library
except the eu-* tools
Fix build on aarch64/musl issues
Header inclusion ends up with duplicate definitions of iovec struct
since uclibc defines the same in usersapce, we have been depending upong
including the kernel header on aarch64, using sys/uio.h is the right
approach
Fix x86 build warning seen on musl
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Fix a variety of problems such as typos, bad punctuations, or incorrect
Upstream-Status values.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
It is derived from elfutils 0.148, but 0.162 doesn't need them, it
doesn't need i386_dis.h or x86_64_dis.h either, there are the same two
files in the source, so move elfutils/i386_dis.h to
elfutils-0.148/i386_dis.h and elfutils/x86_64_dis.h to
elfutils-0.148/x86_64_dis.h for elfutils 0.148 only.
Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The original uclibc-support.patch is not compatible with elfutils-0.161.
It should be corrected through adjusting context.
So regenerate a new patch for elfutils-0.161, rename the patch for
elfutils-0.148, and put them into respective directories.
Signed-off-by: Junling Zheng <zhengjunling@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
- Upgrade elfutils to 0.160
- Move 0.148 patches from elfutils to elfutils-0.148
- Drop 0.158 patches that got from debain, so far debian
doesn't provide patches for 0.160 (the latest is 0.159)
- Move fixheadercheck.patch from 0.159 to 0.160
- We choose to use 0.159 patches from debian for the current 0.160
which located in elfutils-0.160
1) Rebase the following patches from 0.159 to 0.160
hppa_backend.diff
arm_backend.diff
mips_backend.diff
m68k_backend.diff
arm_func_value.patch
arm_unwind_ret_mask.patch
2) Rebase redhat-portability.diff according to
commit 52a6d20519870103134166d91e22d21fd736195d
Author: Roxana Ciobanu <roxana.ciobanu@intel.com>
Date: Tue Jul 1 17:17:00 2014 +0300
elfutils/elfutils-native: Fix patching generated files
3) Drop the following patches which have already beem merged to 0.160
arm_unsupported.patch
arm_syscall.patch
unaligned.patch
aarch64-run-native-test-fix.patch
Signed-off-by: Hongxu Jia <hongxu.jia@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
The 'dest' and 'src' can be same, we need to save the value of src32[2]
before swaping it.
Signed-off-by: Roy Li <rongqing.li@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Patch redhat-portability.diff was patching generated files.
This patch removes every hunk related to Makefile.in and configure files.
[YOCTO #6491]
Signed-off-by: Roxana Ciobanu <roxana.ciobanu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
In the last patch we missed similar update for test/line2addr.c
which meant that the build still failed.
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
The patch redhat-portability.diff causes this issue
so lets revert the portion which was using %a instead of %m
thats recommended anyway, redhat patch seems to be targetting
old compilers.
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The do-autoreconf patches only change generated files. We run autoreconf ourselves
so we don't need these patches. Worse, they cause failures since the do_patch
task can't rerun after configure since the files change and the patch is no longer
clean.
Drop the patches since we don't need them.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Following build error will appear on Fedora18+:
ar.c: In function 'do_oper_delete':
ar.c:918:31: error: argument to 'sizeof' in 'memset' call is the same expression as the destination; did you mean to dereference it? [-Werror=sizeof-pointer-memaccess]
memset (found, '\0', sizeof (found));
Signed-off-by: Zhenhua Luo <zhenhua.luo@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Following build error will appear on Fedora18.
nm.c: In function 'show_symbols_sysv':
nm.c:756:27: error: argument to 'sizeof' in 'snprintf' call is the same expression as the destination; did you mean to provide an explicit length? [-Werror=sizeof-pointer-memaccess]
snprintf (name, sizeof name, "[invalid sh_name %#" PRIx32 "]",
^
Signed-off-by: Zhenhua Luo <zhenhua.luo@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
This patch makes the link to the dependencies of libdw explicit, as recent ld
no longer implicitly links them. See
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-March/133601.html as
a similar example of the error message you can encounter without this patch,
and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UnderstandingDSOLinkChange and
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ChangeInImplicitDSOLinking for more
details.
Signed-off-by: Christopher Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com>
|
