| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files |
|---|
|
packagegroup-core-tools-profile currently pulls in the 'legacy' lttng
packages, which are useless without legacy lttng support in the kernel.
This makes packagegroup-core-tools-profile pull in the lttng 2.0
packages instead, which don't need any kernel modifications to work.
Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
These are needed to support upgrading from task-* to packagegroup-*
within existing target images at runtime.
Note: these settings will very likely be moved to a separate inc file
at some point in the future.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
These are needed to support upgrading from task-* to packagegroup-*
within existing target images at runtime.
Note: these settings will very likely be moved out to a separate inc
file at some point in the future.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Allow references to the old task packages to continue to work. This does
not add RPROVIDES for everything, just those packages that are likely to
have been referred to.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
This provides one package group, packagegroup-core-apps-console, which
is usually brought in by adding "apps-console-core" to IMAGE_FEATURES.
Aside from the naming inconsistencies, this is a group of mostly
unrelated packages, none of which are actually "apps". Handling each
one:
* dbus: should mostly be brought in by package runtime dependencies
* avahi-daemon: if you are using packagegroup-base (as all images that
inherit from core-image do) this is brought in by having "zeroconf" in
DISTRO_FEATURES.
* portmap: not very useful by itself; should be brought in by selecting
NFS server/client through other means.
* psplash (or whatever SPLASH is set to): this has been changed to be
an explicit item "splash" in IMAGE_FEATURES. Since this is a fairly
fundamental feature, a piece of code has been added to automatically
handle this for images still using apps-console-core (and show a
warning).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Since package groups don't actually fetch or distribute anything and we
no longer run do_configure we don't need to set this variable anymore.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
openswan was only ever provided in unmaintained form in meta-demoapps
which has been removed, so we never really provided it in OE-Core.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Also clean out items already handled by that class (dev/dbg packages,
ALLOW_EMPTY, etc.)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
I'm not convinced everyone who wants to serve NFS needs rpcinfo, nor is
it clear that rpcinfo is actually provided as part of eglibc-utils
anymore, so let's just remove this.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
* Bootloader selection (u-boot, redboot, etc.) is not handled using
feature selection anymore, so remove these packages
* Realistically there are no packages we can always know that need to
be installed for a screen/touchscreen these days, so remove these
* Similarly, all RAID configurations can't be supported just using
one package or list of packages, so remove the raid package.
* Remove default settings of MACHINE_ESSENTIAL_*, these variables
aren't referred to in this recipe.
* Remove some outdated comments
* Fix indenting
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
"Package group" is a much more appropriate name for these than task,
since we use the word task to describe units of work executed by
BitBake.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
