| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files |
|---|
|
Prompted by bitbake commit 2ba8a6b25ccc12e7b543e8450121e5311c7a701d,
add .txz to the list of archives used within get_recipe_local_files()
here as well.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Specifically:
1) remove +git${SRCPV} stuff from comparison and output; it's just
unnecessary clutter;
2) write the commit id of the latest version tag into the output;
this saves quite a bit of trouble of manually checking what that
commit id is when doing version updates;
3) when UPSTREAM_CHECK_COMMITS is set, ignore the tags altogether;
instead check if the latest commit is different to the one we use,
and if so, report that the recipe can be updated to said commit
(which is also written into the output, as in 2). Multiple
recipes are failing the upstream check because they never
issue tags, now we can fix them.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
If you're not sure what changes devtool finish is going to make, or
you're not sure you're finished with your modifications, it is useful to
be able to see what devtool finish is going to do beforehand, so add
a -N/--dry-run option to make that possible.
(It's also very useful for debugging devtool finish itself.)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
devtool upgrade did not properly handle setting SRC_URI checksums for
recipes that use named SRC_URI entries and also use those names in the
SRC_URI checksums. A further complication was where the name contained
an expression that changed with the version e.g. ${PV} (probably quite
rare, but the dnsmasq recipe in meta-networking is currently one such
recipe.) All of these are now handled properly.
Additionally, drop the _get_checksums() function that wasn't being
called from anywhere in the code.
Note that this now turns nowrap_vars in recipeutils.py to be a list of
regexes, hence things such as [ and ] need to be appropriately escaped.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
If a value was split over multiple lines (e.g. as SRC_URI usually is)
then we were inserting the value as one item in the lines list with
newlines between each line. There's nothing wrong with this if you're
writing the list out to a file, but if you want to generate a patch (as
patch_recipe_file() will do if the patch parameter is set to True) then
the diff output looks a bit odd. Split the value before adding it to the
lines list to resolve this.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
find_layerdir() should really return absolute paths, so make it do so.
This fixes devtool finish not deleting files it should do after devtool
upgrade if the specified path is relative, since the devtool finish code
was assuming that find_layerdir() was returning an absolute path.
Fixes [YOCTO #12318].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
upon class
If we're upgrading a recipe that appends additional patches for, say,
class-native, and we're just upgrading the target variant, then when we
copied the recipe into the workspace we skipped copying the additional patches
for the native variant. This caused warnings because the workspace
recipe is preferred. Look at SRC_URI for all variants when copying files
to work around this.
More work is needed to make it easier to work with recipes that use
BBCLASSEXTEND where you need to build more than one variant at once, but
this at least fixes the immediate ugliness.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If your BBLAYERS has non-absolute paths in it (e.g.
"${COREBASE}/../something") then none of the paths matched in
copy_recipe_files() with the result that no files got copied and you
ended up with an error later on because the recipe file couldn't be
found at the destination. Fix this as well as adding an explicit check
to see if no files got copied - error out earlier if so.
Fixes [YOCTO #10981].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
getVar() now defaults to expanding by default, thus remove the True
option from getVar() calls with a regex search and replace.
Search made with the following regex: getVar ?\(( ?[^,()]*), True\)
Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <joshua.g.lock@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
This was intended to be used with tinfoil, but tinfoil now has its own
parse_recipe() method to do this which works properly in the memres
case.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Move patch_path(), src_patches() and should_apply() to oe.patch, making
them easier to call from elsewhere (particularly across the
UI/server boundary).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
We now have a function in cooker itself that can do this lookup;
additionally, the rewritten tinfoil's cooker adapter has its own
implementation that can work remotely, so if we use it then this
function can work in that scenario as well.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
By default, have get_recipe_local_files() not return any archive
files. This prevents a local tarball from being erroneously removed
from SRC_URI if you run "devtool modify" on a recipe followed by
"devtool update-recipe". It doesn't actually help you to directly
update the contents of such tarballs, but at least now it won't break
the recipe.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
It is possible to use gzip or bzip2 to compress patches and still refer
to them in compressed form in the SRC_URI value within a recipe. If you
run "devtool modify" on such a recipe, make changes to the commit for
the patch and then run devtool update-recipe, we need to correctly
associate the commit back to the compressed patch file and re-compress
the patch, neither of which we were doing previously.
Additionally, add an oe-selftest test to ensure this doesn't regress in
future.
Fixes [YOCTO #8278].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
If you use devtool update-recipe with the --append option, and a "local"
(in oe-local-files) has been modified we copy it into the specified
destination layer. With the way the devtool update-recipe code works now
the source is always a temp directory, and printing paths from within
that is just confusing, so if the path starts with the temp directory
then just print the file name alone.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
* validate_pn() is supposed to protect against invalid characters, fix
the function so that it actually does (unanchored regex strikes
again...)
* However, now that the function is enforcing the restrictions, we do
still want to allow + in recipe names (e.g. "gtk+")
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
It's rare but there are recipes that have individual files (as opposed
to archives) in SRC_URI using subdir= to put them under the source tree,
the examples in OE-Core being bzip2 and openssl. This broke devtool
update-recipe (and devtool finish) because the file wasn't unpacked into
the oe-local-files directory and thus when it came time to update the
recipe, the file was assumed to have been deleted by the user and thus
the file was erroneously removed. Add logic to handle these properly so
that this doesn't happen.
(We still have another potential problem in that these files become part
of the initial commit from upstream, which could be confusing because
they didn't come from there - but that's a separate issue and not one
that is trivially solved.)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
|
|
multi-configuration builds
Unfortunately to implenent multiconfig support in bitbake some APIs
had to change. This updates code in OE to match the changes in bitbake.
Its mostly periperhal changes around devtool/recipetool
[Will need a bitbake version requirement bump which I'll make when merging]
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If you supplied an empty file to patch_recipe() (or an empty list to
patch_recipe_lines()) then the result was IndexError because the code
checking to see if it needed to add an extra line of padding didn't
check to see if there were in fact any lines before trying to access the
last line.
Fixes [YOCTO #9972].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Add a subcommand which will "finish" the work on a recipe. This is
effectively the same as update-recipe followed by reset, except that the
destination layer is required and it will do the right thing depending
on the situation - if the recipe file itself is in the workspace (e.g.
as a result of devtool add), the recipe file and any associated files
will be moved to the destination layer; or if the destination layer is
the one containing the original recipe, the recipe will be overwritten;
otherwise a bbappend will be created to apply the changes. In all cases
the layer path can be loosely specified - it could be a layer name, or
a partial path into a recipe. In the case of upgrades, devtool finish
will also take care of deleting the old recipe.
This avoids the user having to figure out the correct actions when
they're done - they just do "devtool finish recipename layername" and
it saves their work and then removes the recipe from the workspace.
Addresses [YOCTO #8594].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
This provides us with the information we need to remove the original
version recipe and associated files when running "devtool finish" after
"devtool upgrade".
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
* Allow the function to be called with the base layer path (in which
case it will just return the same path)
* Ensure that the function doesn't recurse indefinitely if it's called
on a file that's not inside a layer
* Correct the doc comment for accuracy
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
This patch contains all the other misc pieces of the transition to
python3 which didn't make sense to be broken into individual patches.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Replaced iteritems -> items, itervalues -> values,
iterkeys -> keys or 'in'
Signed-off-by: Ed Bartosh <ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com>
|
|
xrange() no longer exists in python 3, use range()
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Iterators now return views, not lists in python3. Where we need
lists, handle this explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
python3 standardises its use of iteration operations. Update
the code to match the for python3 requires.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Add some more variables in appropriate places in recipe_progression such
that the patch_recipe_* functions are able to insert variables in the
right place within a recipe.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This function was assuming that what you wanted was that output lines
had trailing newline characters. If you're just outputting each line
verbatim to a text file then that's fine, but sometimes you start with
the assumption that the lines don't have trailing newlines; thus we
shouldn't allow for the possibility that the caller doesn't want them
and add a parameter to control it.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Split out a function from patch_recipe_file() that takes just the lines
as input so we can edit recipe lines in memory. This will be used within
recipetool to ensure we insert new values in the right place.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If a recipe sets SRC_URI and then appends more items to it with +=
(such as the current rpm recipe in OE-Core), the code in
patch_recipe_file() was failing with a traceback. Work around the
problem for now by dropping the existing lines if we understand the
operation, else just set the value outright at the end. This leaves
something to be desired as it either doesn't respect the existing
structure or leaves a mess but it's better than the current
breakage.
We'll need to come up with a better solution later. Part of the problem
is the existing code structure doesn't allow for patch_recipe_file() to
know what's being added or removed - it only knows the final value that
the caller wants set.
Fixes [YOCTO #9458].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Use bb.utils.edit_metadata() to replace some of the logic in this
function; this avoids us effectively having two implementations of the
same thing. In the process fix the following issues:
* Insert values before any leading comments for the next variable
instead of after them
* Insert overridden variables (e.g. RDEPENDS_${PN}) in the correct place
* Properly handle replacing varflag settings (e.g. SRC_URI[md5sum])
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Ensure that the user specifies just the name portion instead of a file
name with extension. (We can't just look for . since there are recipe
names such as "glib-2.0" that legitimately contain .).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
For modify / extract / upgrade, if the specified "recipe" is not
actually a recipe but a virtual target such as virtual/kernel, map it
correctly to the actual recipe and make sure we use that name within the
workspace. Thanks to Chris Larson for reminding me this was still broken
and for a hint on how to fix it.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
|
|
empty or absent
Instead, simply return the version of the recipe, so that the upstream
version checker will declare that they match.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
These functions ostensibly allowed parsing a recipe without bbappends
but this clearly hadn't been tested because a variable was unassigned in
both of them in that case.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Variables such as SRC_URI which are space-separated may also contain
Python expressions (${@...}) which themselves contain spaces that
shouldn't be split when splitting the value into items. In order to
ensure this we need to use a custom splitting function instead of just
string.split().
This issue could be seen when doing "devtool modify sudo", adding a
commit to the resulting source repository then "devtool update-recipe" -
the Python expression in SRC_URI was being unnecessarily broken onto
multiple lines.
Fixes [YOCTO #8046].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Let's have the caller do this and then the function is a bit more
flexible (e.g. we can choose to parse with bbappends or not); fix up
calls to this function appropriately (of which there are only two, both
within devtool).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Previously only numeric characters were matches and anything else was
discarded, so 4.0-rc3, 2005e, 1.0.2a and similar versions got truncated.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Some recipes uses v or r prefixes in versions that makes wrong
comparisions over recipes like lz4 r123 > 128.
Signed-off-by: Aníbal Limón <anibal.limon@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Bitbake fetcher latest_versionstring now returns a tuple with (version,
revision) that helps SCM's like git to build current upstream version.
[YOCTO #7605]
Signed-off-by: Aníbal Limón <anibal.limon@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Don't use pfx and sfx when not exist because cause formatting errors
like 2.9HASH instead of 2.9+gitAUTOINC+HASH.
Signed-off-by: Aníbal Limón <anibal.limon@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If we sort by length of name here we get the variables we are interested
in first. I've tested this with all of the variables we care about (the
ones at the top of bitbake.conf) and it returns the right results.
This fixes the failures we've been seeing in the oe-selftest
test_recipetool_appendfile_* tests.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Recipes that don't have SRC_URI means that don't use upstream sources
so returns 1.0.
Signed-off-by: Aníbal Limón <anibal.limon@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The order of the keys from the data store is not prescribed. If
target_datadir comes before datadir the selftests fail since the 'wrong'
variable is used for substitutions. This highlights an issue with the
replace_dir_vars() function. Fix this.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Cc: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Christopher Larson <kergoth@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Use pv instead of rd this make the function more generic and
avoid copy recipe data.
Signed-off-by: Aníbal Limón <anibal.limon@linux.intel.com>
|
|
functions
The get_recipe_upstream_version functions tries to get the current
version of recipe in upstream it uses bb.fetch2 latest_versionstring
method also latest_revision when is SCM.
The get_recipe_pv_without_srcpv discards the SRCPV in SCM's recipe like
git it returns a tuple with the version, prefix and suffix of a PV.
Signed-off-by: Aníbal Limón <anibal.limon@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Locating which recipe provides a file in an image that you want to
modify and then figuring out how to bbappend the recipe in order to
replace it can be a tedious process. Thus, add a new appendfile
subcommand to recipetool, providing the ability to create a bbappend
file to add/replace any file in the target system. Without the -r
option, it will search for the recipe packaging the specified file
(using pkgdata from previously built recipes). The bbappend will be
created at the appropriate path within the specified layer directory
(which may or may not be in your bblayers.conf) or if one already exists
it will be updated appropriately.
Fairly extensive oe-selftest tests are also provided.
Implements [YOCTO #6447].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
