| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files |
|---|
|
The name of the license for bzip2 is wrong causing warnings
to be thrown.
Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
bzip requires it's own specific license.
Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
non-SPDX license name in license.bbclass
Signed-off-by: Florin Sarbu <florin.sarbu@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Another lone license with no generic available.
Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
socat uses this. There is no good standardized text for this,
but as socat is the only one who utilizes this, it should do
for now although this package has some licensing issues according
to debian. See:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=632481
Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This is a fairly large commit, so I want to step through some of
what this accomplishes:
1. Additional licenses
I've added/modified/corrected some of the common licenses
within OE-core in prep. for a major license audit. Most of these
are in SPDX format. A few, there is no OSI equivalent.
2. Additional SPDX mappings
I've added some additional SPDX mappings to account for removing
some duplicate licenses. (ie GPL-2 and GPL-2.0 were the same)
I've also remapped a few things to more accurately reflect what
they should be pointing at.
Note: Artistic/LGPL/GPL/MPL. Quite a few LICENSE fields list these
licenses. They make no sense and need auditing. In a future commit
I have some fixes to particularly egregious LICENSE fields, but
a full audit should be done. I've listed to obvious candidates at:
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/License_Audit
3. License manifest
We now have a license manifest generation that occurs in rootfs for
everything BUT .deb. This requires the changes Paul Eggleton has
done to rootfs_* particularly the list_installed_packages function.
The manifest is accurate during a parallel bitbake now (Weee!) and
is prime for my planned SPDX format manifest during the next period.
4. License manifest on image.
We also want the ability to add licenses to the image. This
functionality is also in base-files and will be stripped out in my
next commit. The manifest is not added by default and is a two var
setting in license.conf:
If I want *just* the manifest on the image (small) then I set:
COPY_LIC_MANIFEST = "1"
This copies the manifest to:
/usr/share/common-licenses/license.manifest
If I want the actual PKG license text on the image (much larger)
I need to set both both COPY_LIC_MANIFEST and COPY_LIC_DIRS in
license.conf. This will create:
/usr/share/common-licenses/(package name)/(licenses in LIC_SRC_URI)
Word of warning. This can be larger than wanted depending on image
and is probably ripe for linking licenses, but I ran out of time this
week to get that done.
5. Custom License search path.
We now have the ability to add licenses to the build without touching
common-licenses. This is set via license.conf:
LICENSE_PATH += "/path/to/custom/licenses"
You want to make sure the license is unique. license.bbclass picks the
first license it finds.
Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
|
|
files
New users sometimes delete files in tmp/deploy/images assuming they will
be re-created just by re-running the build, and then are confused when
this doesn't work. To discourage people from doing this, create a file
called README_-_DO_NOT_DELETE_FILES_IN_THIS_DIRECTORY.txt in
tmp/deploy/images containing an explanation of what needs to be done to
re-create files there.
Fixes [YOCTO #1315] and [YOCTO #1346].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Add a new function that is responsible for fixing directory and file
permissions, owners and groups during the packaging process. This will fix
various issues where two packages may create the same directory and end up
with different permissions, owner and/or group.
The issue being resolved is that if two packages conflict in their ownership
of a directory, the first installed into the rootfs sets the permissions.
This leads to a least potentially non-deterministic filesystems, at worst
security defects.
The user can specify their own settings via the configuration files
specified in FILESYSTEM_PERMS_TABLES. If this is not defined, it will
fall back to loading files/fs-perms.txt from BBPATH. The format of this
file is documented within the file.
By default all of the system directories, specified in bitbake.conf, will
be fixed to be 0755, root, root.
The fs-perms.txt contains a few default entries to correct documentation,
locale, headers and debug sources. It was discovered these are often
incorrect due to being directly copied from the build user environment.
The entries needed to match the base-files package have also been added.
Also tweak a couple of warnings to provide more diagnostic information.
Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
|
|
I've added more licenses from SPDX and corrected the gcc license
so that it is a. parsable and b. accurate to the SPDX standard.
I've also done some cleanup of license text and gdb's LICENSE
field.
Signed-off-by: Beth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com>
|
|
I'm adding full common licenses to the common license directory.
These licenses are taken from the SPDX project or the OSI license
repository. They conform to the SPDX naming convention and will be
used by the new license.bbclass license parser in order to maintain
some sort of internal standard for license naming.
Going forward, we should have a bigger conversation about the LICENSE
field and standardizing that to conform to this naming standard.
Signed-off-by: Beth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com>
|
|
Fix to my bad license parsing. Also added the MIT generic license
files.
Signed-off-by: Beth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com>
|
|
This is an intial commit for the license reporting system. A few notes:
The LICENSE fields needs to be standardized throughout poky. As it
stands, we throw a warning if the license file is not found (either
because it does not exist or because LICENSE_FILE_CHKSUM is munged)
in the generic license directory. This should eventually become an
error.
I've seen a few places where Apache-v2.0 is written differently and
I'm sure this will throw the above warning. This does not put the
license data on the rootfs. Also, I provide both the actual license
text and a link to the best guess of the generic_license. That guessing
is not very robust and I'm loath to get into a bunch of pattern matching
rather than standardize LICENSE.
This adds one new param to poky.conf and one new to license.bbclass:
LICENSE_DIR: the base directory we copy all the license results to (set
in license.bbclass)
COMMON_LICENSE_DIR: this is the directory that holds all the common
generic license files. currently meta/files/common-licenses (set in
poky.conf)
TODO:
- We should verify the common-licenses. I stripped these from my Ubuntu
10.10 system.
- We should allow the capability of licenses on the rootfs, although the
resulting image created would be a lot larger.
- More common-licenses. I don't include bzip, zlib, ICS.... I should,
but that means tracking down a lot of licenses.
- General cleanup of licensing and standardization of names. We should
standardize on a naming convention. What's in licenses.conf should
match up with what is in the recipes which should match with what is
in common-licenses. Outside the scope of this though. See:
http://bugzilla.pokylinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=650
|
|
/dev directory)
git-svn-id: https://svn.o-hand.com/repos/poky/trunk@2641 311d38ba-8fff-0310-9ca6-ca027cbcb966
|
|
git-svn-id: https://svn.o-hand.com/repos/poky/trunk@530 311d38ba-8fff-0310-9ca6-ca027cbcb966
|
