| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files |
|---|
|
Add support for MIPS Release 6 ISA
Signed-off-by: Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel <Zubair.Kakakhel@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Add support for MIPS Release 6 ISA. The loader is located at a
new place for multiarch.
For more details, check https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch
and https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/ABIList#mips
Signed-off-by: Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel <Zubair.Kakakhel@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Add support for MIPS Release 6 ISA
Signed-off-by: Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel <Zubair.Kakakhel@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Add support for MIPS Release 6 ISA
Signed-off-by: Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel <Zubair.Kakakhel@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Add support for MIPS release 6 of the ISA
Signed-off-by: Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel <Zubair.Kakakhel@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If attempting to patch a git repo without a proper git config setup,
an error will occur saying user.name/user.email are needed by git
am/apply. After some code was removed from kernel-yocto, it was
simple enough to reproduce this error by creating a kernel patch and
using a container to build.
This patch abstracts out functionality that existed in buildhistory
for use in other classes. It also adds a call to this functionality
to the kernel-yocto class.
Fixes [YOCTO #10346]
introduced in OE-core revision
0f698dfd1c8bbc0d53ae7977e26685a7a3df52a3
Signed-off-by: Stephano Cetola <stephano.cetola@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
* otherwise there is a lot of warnings about missing close on file descriptor
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
PACKAGE_EXCLUDE_COMPLEMENTARY
Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The checkstatus function fires an event to notify bitbake UI about
the progress of the task, this function is implemented using ThreadPool
and is causing event lose when multiple threads tries to fire an event
(writes over socket/fd).
[YOCTO #10330]
Signed-off-by: Aníbal Limón <anibal.limon@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This variable is used by libtool to know what paths are on the default loader
search path. As we have modified loader paths, native.bbclass can tell libtool
that both the sysroot libdir and the host library paths are searched, so no
RPATHs for those will be generated.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This variable is used by libtool to know what paths are on the default loader
search path. As we have modified loader paths, cross.bbclass can tell libtool
that both the sysroot libdir and the host library paths are searched, so no
RPATHs for those will be generated.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
When changing multilibs, allarch recipes should not be rebuilding. This
adds enough variable exclusions to make this work properly. Future
regressions will be prevented with new testing.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
package_write_rpm references the MULTILIBS variable and the checksums
of nativesdk recipes were changing as a result of this.
We don't need/want MULTILIBS values for nativesdk so disable this.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This begins moving away from the deprecated subprocess calls in an
effort to eventually move to some more global abstraction using the run
convenience method provided in python 3.5.
[ YOCTO #9342 ]
Signed-off-by: Stephano Cetola <stephano.cetola@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Add a space between the root and append parameter, similar to
syslinux.bbclass, in creating the final grub.cfg.
Without this, the final kernel boot parameters will concatenate into
strings like root=/dev/ram0console=ttyS0...
Signed-off-by: Raymond Tan <raymond.tan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Much as with -native recipes, as addressed in commit
b15730caf0d4c40271796887505507f2501958bb, arch specific variables
like MIPSPKGSFX_ABI were affecting -nativesdk sstate checksums for
recipes like nativesdk-glibc-initial.
Disable multilib_header for nativesdk as we don't use multilibs in
this scenario.
[YOCTO #10320]
Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <joshua.g.lock@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
The last line in the generated /etc/build doesn't end
with a newline anymore, restore it.
Signed-off-by: André Draszik <git@andred.net>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Arm is unusual in that we force it to "linux-gnueabi" and "linux" doesn't
build. This was causing problems for multilib configurations which were assuming
"linux" was the default compiler rather than linux-gnueabi.
This change does two things, ensures symlinks are generated for linux-gnueabi
and also adapts the libgcc code to account for the difference on arm.
It still needs to immediately expand/save TARGET_VENDOR but we defer
deciding what TARGET_OS should be until we know TARGET_ARCH (which the
multilib code may change).
[YOCTO #8642]
Note that sanity tests of a 32 bit arm multilib still break due to issues
with the kernel headers on a mixed bit system. This looks to be a general
headers issue for the platform though and a different type of bug.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
* in some cases we might set QB_DEFAULT_KERNEL to the real filename
instead of symlink and then this whole readlink work around actually
breaks the build, because os.readlink fails on normal files:
>>> os.readlink('deploy/images/qemux86/bzImage-linux-yocto-qemux86-master-20160927084848.bin')
'bzImage-linux-yocto-qemux86.bin'
>>> os.readlink('deploy/images/qemux86/bzImage-linux-yocto-qemux86.bin')
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
OSError: [Errno 22] Invalid argument: '/jenkins/mjansa/build-starfish-master-mcf/BUILD/deploy/images/qemux86/bzImage-linux-yocto-qemux86.bin'
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This function never worked because the SDK_OUTPUT and SDKPATH vars are
written bash-style in a python function. The only reason it never failed
a build is because the function bails out the start because of the flag
CHECK_SDK_SYSROOTS.
And I guess nobody tested with CHECK_SDK_SYSROOTS enabled until now.
Signed-off-by: Ioan-Adrian Ratiu <adrian.ratiu@ni.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Removed parted-native dependency from do_image_wic as it's
already mentioned in IMAGE_DEPENDS_wic variable.
Thanks to Christopher Larson for pointing out to this.
Signed-off-by: Ed Bartosh <ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
When changing SDKMACHINE, we may encounter an error forcing us to wipe the TMP folder.
Since only SDK_ARCH is captured in the PN of the crosssdk recipes, changes to SDK_OS
result in conflicts. Eventually we hit the error:
ERROR: ...: The recipe <...> is trying to install files into a shared area when those files already exist.
The build has stopped as continuing in this scenario WILL break things
This patchset addresses the problem by SDK_SYS as the recipe name suffix instead
of SDK_ARCH.
[YOCTO #9281]
Signed-off-by: Juro Bystricky <juro.bystricky@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
When a recipe uses more than one source which isn't a plain file (for
example, multiple git repos), then do_ar_original created the source
archives using the same filename and thus only archived one source.
The "name" parameter is used as file suffix to create unique names for
each source, leading to archives following this pattern:
deploy/${TARGET_SYS}/${PF}/${PF}[-<name>].tar.gz.
The ${PF} part is a bit redundant, which may or may not be
desirable. The patch is more localized this way (no need to modify
create_tarball()).
For example, meta-oic's iotivity_1.1.1.bb uses:
url_iotivity = "git://github.com/iotivity/iotivity.git"
branch_iotivity = "1.1-rel"
SRC_URI = "${url_iotivity};destsuffix=${S};branch=${branch_iotivity};protocol=http;"
url_tinycbor = "git://github.com/01org/tinycbor.git"
SRC_URI += "${url_tinycbor};name=tinycbor;destsuffix=${S}/extlibs/tinycbor/tinycbor;protocol=http"
url_hippomocks = "git://github.com/dascandy/hippomocks.git"
SRC_URI += "${url_hippomocks};name=hippomocks;destsuffix=${S}/extlibs/hippomocks-master;protocol=http"
SRC_URI += "file://hippomocks_mips_patch"
url_gtest = "http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/repo/pkgs/gtest/gtest-1.7.0.zip/2d6ec8ccdf5c46b05ba54a9fd1d130d7/gtest-1.7.0.zip"
SRC_URI += "${url_gtest};name=gtest;subdir=${BP}/extlibs/gtest"
url_sqlite = "http://www.sqlite.org/2015/sqlite-amalgamation-3081101.zip"
SRC_URI += "${url_sqlite};name=sqlite3;subdir=${BP}/extlibs/sqlite3;unpack=false"
These now get archived in deploy/sources/*/iotivity-1.1.1-r2/ as:
gtest-1.7.0.zip iotivity-1.1.1-r2-recipe.tar.gz sqlite-amalgamation-3081101.zip
hippomocks_mips_patch iotivity-1.1.1-r2.tar.gz
iotivity-1.1.1-r2-hippomocks.tar.gz iotivity-1.1.1-r2-tinycbor.tar.gz
Signed-off-by: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Support for absolute paths in the "subdir" parameter was recently
added (bitbake rev: c3873346c6fa). The git fetcher has supported
absolute paths in "destsuffix" already before.
When the path is absolute as in destsuffix=${S}/foobar, the tmpdir
used by do_ar_original gets ignored, which breaks:
- source code archiving (tmpdir is empty)
- compilation due to race conditions (for example, ${S} getting
modified by do_ar_original while do_compile runs)
To solve this, these parameters get removed from URLs before
instantiating the fetcher for them.
This is done unconditionally also for relative paths, because these
paths are not useful when archiving the original source (upstream
source does not have them, they only get used by the recipe during
compilation).
Signed-off-by: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Its useful to be able to query a list of variables to obtain the values
in each multilib context. This adds such a function which works even
if called in the non-default recipe context.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
There are architectures which support running in 32 and 64 bit
flavours however the simulation is provided in a specific QEMU
setting, requiring us to use a different binary. This patch allow this
to be done using, for example:
QEMU_TARGET_BINARY_ppce5500 = "qemu-ppc64abi32"
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Fixes:
* During install all files were recompiled -> redurced build time
* For some recipes we found lot of links to build host image path
Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
