summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/meta/classes/archiver.bbclass
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFiles
2016-04-13archiver: Improve debug outputRichard Purdie1
Make the output from the task more informative about which directories are being referenced. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-04-12archiver: Ensure sstate-inputdir directory is createdRichard Purdie1
Without this, do_archive_sources will fail for the gcc tasks where there is common source and the other tasks are not added as dependencies. The failure happens when trying to restore these tasks from sstate. To fix this ensure the sources directory is created as expected by the sstate code. [YOCTO #9433] Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-04-09archiver: Fix ASSUME_PROVIDED issuesRichard Purdie1
Currently the dependencies injected by this class for recipes in ASSUME_PROVIDED e.g. tar-native or chrpath-native are ignored. We need to use their "replacement" names, e.g. tar-replacement-native. This avoids broken archives and sstate failures with these recipes. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-03-30archiver.bbclass: addtask do_deploy_archives_setsceneRobert Yang1
There was a do_deploy_archives_setscene, but no addtask. Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
2016-03-28archiver.bbclass: Just archive gcc-source for all gcc recipesMariano Lopez1
It is pointless to archive several times the gcc source. This change will archive gcc source once, for the gcc-source-{PV} recipe. [YOCTO #9327] Signed-off-by: Mariano Lopez <mariano.lopez@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-03-24archiver.bbclass: Fix tar name for git repositoriesMariano Lopez1
When archiving the original source, the git repositories have the name as they are in the $DL_DIR plus the source revision; i.e. "git.yoctoproject.org.linux-yocto-4.4.git.89419d8b90_dadb436904.tar.gz". This change set the tar name to $PF.tar.gz instead, to have consistency with the others archives created by the class. Signed-off-by: Mariano Lopez <mariano.lopez@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
2016-03-24archiver.bbclass: Fix gcc-source corner caseMariano Lopez1
Bitbake couldn't add the task ar_configured when trying to archive the configured source for gcc-source-${PV} recipes. This is because the task depended in the do_configure and this task doesn't exist for gcc-source. This fix allows to archive configured gcc-source recipe. Signed-off-by: Mariano Lopez <mariano.lopez@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
2016-03-24archiver.bbclass: Fix use of ARCHIVER_WORKDIR and ARCHIVER_OUTDIRMariano Lopez1
Currently do_unpack_and_patch() and do_ar_configured() are using the ARCHIVER_OUTDIR as the ARCHIVER_WORKDIR, this lead to have duplicated files inside the tars when using the archiver class for patched and configured source. Signed-off-by: Mariano Lopez <mariano.lopez@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
2016-03-24archiver.bbclass: Don't expand python functions in dumpdataMariano Lopez1
Currently the dumpdata task expands python data in the datastore, in some functions this causes a silent error and the task will fail. The change also rewrite the function to make a bit clearer. Signed-off-by: Mariano Lopez <mariano.lopez@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
2015-11-24bbclass: fix spelling mistakesMaxin B. John1
Fix some spelling mistakes in bbclass files Signed-off-by: Maxin B. John <maxin.john@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
2015-11-24archiver.bbclass: add bbappend when do_ar_recipe kernel and gcc packagesJian Liu1
bbappend files are not included in the archiver during do_ar_recipe. Find and put them into the tarball. Signed-off-by: Jian Liu <jian.liu@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
2015-11-24archiver.bbclass: fix previous issue regarding work-shared for linux-yoctoAlejandro Hernandez1
A previous patch intended to fix and improve the archiver class, and while it did for gcc packages, with it some issues ended up being hidden, the kernel tasks taken from kernel.bbclass and kernel-yocto.bbclass specifically expect the kernel to use work-shared, which either ended up causing issues or wasting time doing unnecessary work, this patch fixes these issues by performing the right tasks within the archiver in the right order [YOCTO #8378] Signed-off-by: Alejandro Hernandez <alejandro.hernandez@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
2015-10-21archiver.bbclass: Fixes and improves archiver class for kernel and gcc packagesAlejandro Hernandez1
gcc packages use a shared source directory, this causes an issue since the archiver will try to patch the same source several times (one for each gcc package), producing an error, the archiver class used stamp-base to check this, nonetheless our gcc packages no longer use stamp-base, they use gcc-shared instead, which is what broke this functionality. This patch adds a check to see whether or not the source should be patched, avoiding patching the source when it shouldn't. Also, we dont need to create multiple identical tarballs for all gcc packages, this patch fixes this and creates a single source tarball for gcc. When requesting patched sources, a race condition is created for linux-yocto tasks, unpack_and_patch is executed along with kernel_configme, which most of the time causes errors during configure, since kernel_configme task is specific to the kernel, simply modifying the tasks order by creating a dependency to kernel_configme was impossible, causing errors on all other packages that didnt use kernel_configme, this is fixed by creating a special case for the kernel, adding tasks with correct dependencies, avoiding the race condition and behaving the way it should for all other packages as well. [YOCTO #8378] Signed-off-by: Alejandro Hernandez <alejandro.hernandez@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
2015-09-24archiver: stamp-base is dead, remove itRichard Purdie1
stamp-base was only ever used by the shared workdir code in gcc. This turned out to be problematic and has been replaced by other approaches which don't need specialist bitbake knowledge. stamp-base will likely get removed from bitbake but for now, remove it from archiver to simplfy the code since gcc no longer uses it. This stops people getting confused by the obsolete code paths which I'm getting a lot of questions about. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2015-08-19archiver.bbclass: Run deploy_archives in $WORKDIRClemens Lang1
In recipes that are exempt from source code archiving due to COPYLEFT_LICENSE_EXCLUDE, do_deploy_archives does not have a transitive dependency on do_unpack. Given enough parallelism, this means do_deploy_archives can run at the same time or before do_unpack. Because do_deploy_archives did not specify a working directory, its working directory was ${B}, which defaults to ${S}, which may be set by a recipe to a directory that is created by do_unpack. In this case, do_deploy_archives can fail because do_unpack deletes and re-creates the directory and do_deploy_archives cannot change into the non-existent directory. Avoid this problem by explicitly specifying a working directory for do_deploy_archives (and for do_deploy_all_archives as well for good measure). Signed-off-by: Clemens Lang <clemens.lang@bmw-carit.de> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
2015-07-12archiver.bbclass: add do_deploy_all_archivesPatrick Ohly1
When working specifically on source archiving, it is useful to trigger that for all recipes required by something like an image recipe, without actually having to build that. "bitbake -c deploy_all_archives <target>" does that now. Signed-off-by: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2015-06-23copyleft_filter.bbclass: Allow to filter on nameMariano Lopez1
The archiver uses a license based filter to provide the source code. This patch allows to search on name based on two new variables (COPYLEFT_PN_INCLUDE, COPYLEFT_PN_EXCLUDE). Both variables are empty by default. The filter by name has higher priority than the license filter. [YOCTO # 6929] Signed-off-by: Mariano Lopez <mariano.lopez@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
2014-10-24archiver: fix truncation of src_revJoe Slater1
In trying to eliminate AUTOINC+ from revision strings, we accidently truncated the strings to almost guarantee information from SRCREV_FORMAT, when supplied, would be lost. So, we now only delete any AUTOINC+'s from the string. Signed-off-by: Joe Slater <jslater@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
2014-08-27archiver.bbclass: add revision to git tarfile nameJoe Slater1
When archiving original source, insert the first 10 characters of srcrev, after stripping off any AUTOINC+, into the filename for tarfiles created from directories. Signed-off-by: Joe Slater <jslater@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2014-08-23archiver: delete the tail slash in directory nameJian Liu1
If directory names in SRC_URI ended with "/", function do_ar_original() in layers/oe-core/meta/classes/archiver.bbclass will generate a tar file whose name is ".tar.gz". So delete the "/" at the tail of the directory names before use the names. Signed-off-by: Jian Liu <jian.liu@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2014-06-17archiver: create dir 'B' explicitly while WORKDIR changedHongxu Jia1
In the do_unpack_and_patch task of archiver, the changed 'WORKDIR' also casued 'B' changed, create dir 'B' for the possibly requiring of the tasks which executed in do_unpack_and_patch task. Such as cut-ecgl's do_patch required 'B' existed: ... | cp: target 'tmp/work/x86_64-wrs-linux/cut-ecgl/1.0-r0/archiver-work /cut-ecgl-1.0' is not a directory ... | ERROR: Function failed: do_patch (log file is located at tmp/work/ x86_64-wrs-linux/cut-ecgl/1.0-r0/temp/do_unpack_and_patch/ log.do_unpack_and_patch.11886) ... The 'B' dir is implicitly created at the task executing time while the task tag 'dirs' is not assigned. In the above cut-ecgl example, the 'B' was created at the wrl_buildlink executing time which is the prefuncs of task do_unpack. So the following do_patch could use 'B' correctly. But wrl_buildlink is unnecessary and not invoked in the do_unpack_and_patch task. Signed-off-by: Hongxu Jia <hongxu.jia@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2014-03-24archiver.bbclass: emit patch series files for original srcRobert Yang1
Emit patch series files for original src so that the user knows how to apply the patch orderly. [YOCTO #5113] Signed-off-by: Christopher Larson <kergoth@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2014-03-24archiver.bbclass: make it can filter the licenseRobert Yang1
* Filter the license (default: no), the recipe whose license in COPYLEFT_LICENSE_INCLUDE will be included, and in COPYLEFT_LICENSE_EXCLUDE will be excluded. * The user can set the recipe type that would be archived (native, target, and so on), deafult to all. The copyleft_filter.bbclass is come from copyleft_compliance.bbclass, which is used by both copyleft_compliance.bbclass and archiver.bbclass. [YOCTO #5740] Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2014-03-21archiver.bbclass: move a few code to copyleft_compliance.bbclassRobert Yang1
Move the code which is only used by copyleft_compliance.bbclass from archiver.bbclassc, and remove the "inherit archiver" from copyleft_compliance.bbclass. The archiver.bbclass is used for archiving various types of sources, but the copyleft_compliance.bbclass is used for analysing the license, they don't have much relationships. [YOCTO #4986] [YOCTO #5113] Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
2014-03-21archiver.bbclass: refactor itRobert Yang1
The archiver didn't work, and there were a few problems, for example: 1) There was no src_dir.org (or orig), but the diff command still use it 2) There were a few duplicated code 3) It didn't archive the source for the native or gcc 4) The work flow is not very well 5) The "subprocess.call('fakeroot cp xxxx'" should be removed 6) And others ... So that we have to refactor it, the benefits are: 1) Fix the problems and make it work well. 2) Reduce more than 300 lines 3) Make it easy to use. Hre are the explanation about the bbclass: This bbclass is used for creating archive for: 1) original (or unpacked) source: ARCHIVER_MODE[src] = "original" 2) patched source: ARCHIVER_MODE[src] = "patched" (default) 3) configured source: ARCHIVER_MODE[src] = "configured" 4) The patches between do_unpack and do_patch: ARCHIVER_MODE[diff] = "1" And you can set the one that you'd like to exclude from the diff: ARCHIVER_MODE[diff-exclude] ?= ".pc autom4te.cache patches" 5) The environment data, similar to 'bitbake -e recipe': ARCHIVER_MODE[dumpdata] = "1" 6) The recipe (.bb and .inc): ARCHIVER_MODE[recipe] = "1" All of the above can be packed into a .src.rpm package: (when PACKAGES != "") ARCHIVER_MODE[srpm] = "1" [YOCTO #4986] [YOCTO #5113] Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
2014-03-21classes/archive*.bbclass: remove archive-*-source.bbclassRobert Yang1
Nearly all of the codes in the following 3 files are the same, we can move the code to archiver.bbclass and remove them: archive-configured-source.bbclass archive-original-source.bbclass archive-patched-source.bbclass [YOCTO #5113] Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
2013-09-01meta: Don't use deprecated bitbake APIRichard Purdie1
These have been deprecated for a long time, convert the remaining references to the correct modules and prepare for removal of the compatibility support from bitbake. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2013-08-26classes: Remove references to _remove in function names since this may ↵Richard Purdie1
become a bitbake keyword There is a good chance we might want to support a bitbake operator "_remove" which works in a similar way to _append and _prepend. As such, we can't use those keywords in function or variable names. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
2013-06-17archiver.bbclass: check if package contains a copyleft licenseKevin Strasser1
The copyleft filter is only excluding packages that contain a closed source license. This is because oe.license.is_included() returns a boolean value that indicates if the license is excluded, and a string that contains the matched included licenses. If the string is empty it indicates that no licenses were matched. Reject packages that do not contain a copyleft license. [YOCTO 4630] Signed-off-by: Kevin Strasser <kevin.strasser@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
2013-04-03archiver: fix srpm archiving build errorsKevin Strasser1
srpm archiving doesn't need to be handled as a different case when deciding what archive tasks to add. When srpm is selected as the archiving type, the scripts and logs archive staging directory ${WORKDIR}/script-logs is cleaned, and its contents moved out to ${WORKDIR}. Now that we are including ${WORKDIR}/script-logs in sstate-inputdirs, the directory must be preserved. [YOCTO #4032] Signed-off-by: Kevin Strasser <kevin.strasser@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
2013-03-18archiver: fix archive filtering behaviorKevin Strasser1
With the addition of sstate, ensure that archiving tasks are only added to the build if they produce output in the directory specified by the 'sstate-inputdirs' flag. Move calls to 'tar_filter' and 'not_tarball' out to archive-*-source.bbclass in order to filter out packages before their archiving tasks are added to the build. Additionally, negate the return value of copyleft_should_include in tar_filter, so that packages that do not pass are in turn filtered out. Signed-off-by: Kevin Strasser <kevin.strasser@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
2013-02-28archiver class: Use tasks with sstate instead of pre/post funcsMuhammad Shakeel1
* Add tasks to move sources, script/logs and diff/env files in deploy directory. * Enable SSTATE for 'do_archive_scripts_logs' task * Enable SSTATE for 'do_dumpdata_create_diff_gz' task * SSTATE is not used for sources/patches archiver task because source archive package can result into a very large file. It will be an unnecessary overhead to keep sources in DL_DIR and cached-binaries. * If 'SOURCE_ARCHIVE_PACKAGE_TYPE' is 'srpm' then use pre/post functions because in this case we do not want to use tasks to move sources/logs in DEPLOY_DIR. 'do_package_write_rpm' is responsible for handling archiver packages. [YOCTO #3449] Signed-off-by: Muhammad Shakeel <muhammad_shakeel@mentor.com> Signed-off-by: Noor Ahsan <noor_ahsan@mentor.com> Signed-off-by: Christopher Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
2012-11-24archiver.bbclass: DISTRO is not required variable so deal with itMarcin Juszkiewicz1
Signed-off-by: Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-09-03Rename task to packagegroupPaul Eggleton1
"Package group" is a much more appropriate name for these than task, since we use the word task to describe units of work executed by BitBake. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
2012-08-28archiver.bbclass: fix the remove errorRobert Yang1
* The "tar-package" is used for saving the "Source" list for rpmbuild, there is no such a file when "ARCHIVER_MODE[type] ?= srpm", and there would be errors, it hadn't happen before was becuase that the remove function didn't work. Let the "rpmbuild --rmsource" to remove the Sources, and the remove function will just remove the tar-package file. * Remove several unwanted "try ... exception" sentences, let the error raise rather than ignore them when the error happens. * Remove several un-needed code. [YOCTO #2619] Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
2012-08-28archiver.bbclass: remove the "upper()" functionRobert Yang1
The configuration value from the conf file is lower case, e.g. srpm, tar, so there is no reason to use the upper case which makes things complicated. [YOCTO #2619] Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
2012-08-28archiver.bbclass: fix the fakeroot and other issuesRobert Yang1
* Fix the fakeroot issue The archiver.bbclass is used for archiving sources, patches, and logs, it uses the "rpmbuild -bs" from the package_rpm.bbclass to generate the .src.rpm, but it didn't work (it's not easy to explain it clearly): Reason: - It directly used the "fakeroot" command, we don't have such a command in native tools, so it would use the fakeroot from the host, and it would fail when there is no fakeroot on the host. - The "rpmbuild -bs" doesn't need to work under root, but it is in the function do_package_write_rpm which is running under fakeroot, and "rpmbuild" needs to know the source file's user/group name, the source file is the tarball which is created by the postfuncs of do_unpack or do_patch which doesn't use the fakeroot, so the created file's owner would be the real user, e.g.: robert, but there is no such a user under our native tools' fakeroot(pseudo), then the rpmbuild would fail. It worked when use the host's fakeroot in the past was because that the host's fakeroot knows the users on the host. Fix: - Remove the incorrect "fakeroot". - Change the source file's owner to root.root under fakeroot will fix the problem. * Other fixes: - The typo: "do_remove_taball -> do_remove_tarball" which will cause the tarball is not removed. - Add the _sourcedir defination to the rpmbuild command since the the SOURCES would be added to the specfile when archiver.bbclass is inherited, otherwise there would be errors when "rpmbuild -bb", though the build is OK. It only added the defination to "rpmbuild -bs", didn't add to "rpmbuild -bb". [YOCTO #2619] Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
2012-08-28archiver.bbclass: fix the coding styleRobert Yang1
* Make the comment line under 80 characters. * Use the triple double quotes for the docstring. * Add a whitespace behind the comma (,). * Other minor fixes. [YOCTO #2619] Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
2012-08-28archiver.bbclass: indent fixesRobert Yang1
Several fixes: * It uses mixed tab and whitespace as the indent in one function, Fix them to use "4 spaces" as the indent. * Remove the unwanted blank, for example, more than one blank lines appeared together. * Remove the tail whitespace. [YOCTO #2619] Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
2012-07-19Remove a number of unneeded import os/bb callsRichard Purdie1
The bb and os modules are always imported so having these extra import calls are a waste of space/execution time. They also set a bad example for people copy and pasting code so clean them up. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-06-28archiver.bbclass: Add the function of filtering packagesXiaofeng Yan1
This function can miss packages whose license is in "COPYLEFT_LICENSE_EXCLUDE" and tarball packages with license in "COPYLEFT_LICENSE_INCLUDE". [YOCTO #2473] Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Yan <xiaofeng.yan@windriver.com>
2012-06-08archiver.bbclass: Reduce some duplication for function get_licensesXiaofeng Yan1
The content to modify this bbclass is as follow: - Use the existing functions to get license as a directory instead of rewriting it for avoiding code duplication. - Use SPDXLICENSEMAP to map licenses [YOCTO #2473] Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Yan <xiaofeng.yan@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-06-05archiver.bbclass: Improve the usability for the archiver classesXiaofeng Yan1
The usability of the archiver classes can be improved, beyond the simple addition of default values for the variables. A user could well inherit just archiver rather than the individual useful classes, and not realize it will do nothing. [YOCTO #2472] Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Yan <xiaofeng.yan@windriver.com>
2012-05-30meta: replace os.system with subprocess.callRobert Yang1
Replace os.system with subprocess.call since the older function would fail (more or less) silently if the executed program cannot be found More info: http://docs.python.org/library/subprocess.html#subprocess-replacements [YOCTO #2454] Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-05-17archiver.bbclass: Add two default set for avoiding error when missing assignmentXiaofeng Yan1
Add two default set(SOURCE_ARCHIVE_LOG_WITH_SCRIPTS, \ SOURCE_ARCHIVE_PACKAGE_TYPE) to archiver.bbclass for avoiding \ building error when forgetting to assign to them. Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Yan <xiaofeng.yan@windriver.com>
2012-04-11archiver.bbclass: Amend the problem for moving tarballs in ${DL_DIR} to ↵Xiaofeng Yan1
${DEPLOY_DIR}/source when enable archiver When running "bitbake core-imamge-minmal", the error information like the following will appear: ERROR: Error executing a python function in /buildarea2/yzhao-test/poky-test/meta/recipes-core/zlib/zlib_1.2.6.bb: IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/buildarea2/yzhao-test/poky-test/build-archive/downloads/zlib-1.2.6.tar.bz2' An absolute path from variable "file" pointed to tarballs in ${DL_DIR} \ cause this problem. So return base-name of "file" for fixing this bug here. [YOCTO #2272] Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Yan <xiaofeng.yan@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-04-04archiver.bbclass: enhance code readabilityXiaofeng Yan1
The modification is as follow: - Modify some codes with more preferable readability and vague description. - Use existed functions instead of custom functions. Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Yan <xiaofeng.yan@windriver.com>
2012-03-26archiver.bbclass:Xiaofeng Yan1
1 Archive sources in ${S} in the different stage (do_unpack,do_patch,do_configure). 2 Archive patches including series 3 Archive logs including scripts (.bb and .inc files) 4 dump environment resources which show all variable and functions used to xxx.showdata.dump when running a task 5 dump all content in 's' including patches to file xxx.diff.gz All archiving packages will be deployed to ${DEPLOY_DIR}/sources/ [YOCTO #1977] Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Yan <xiaofeng.yan@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>