| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files |
|---|
|
We've been using a -rc4 variant of the libc-headers, now that
4.8 has been released, we switch to the final tgz of the headers.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Updating the common-pc* configuration to have the following mmc
configs available by default:
meta/common-pc-64: use mmc-sdhci feature
meta/common-pc: use mmc-sdhci feature
meta: add mmc/mmc-sdhci feature
meta: add mmc/mmc-block feature
meta: add mmc/base feature
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
We don't autoreconf/libtoolize binutils as it has very strict requirements, so
extend our patching of the stock libtool to include two fixes to RPATH
behaviour, as part of the solution to ensure that native binaries don't have
RPATHs pointing at the host system's /usr/lib.
This generally doesn't cause a problem but it can cause some binaries (such as
ar) to abort on startup:
./x86_64-pokysdk-linux-ar: relocation error: /usr/lib/libc.so.6: symbol
_dl_starting_up, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file ld-linux.so.2 with
link time reference
The situation here is that ar is built and as it links to the host libc/loader
has an RPATH for /usr/lib. If tmp is wiped and then binutils is installed from
sstate relocation occurs and the loader changed to the sysroot, but there
remains a RPATH for /usr/lib. This means that the sysroot loader is used with
the host libc, which can be incompatible. By telling libtool that the host
library paths are in the default search path, and ensuring that all default
search paths are not added as RPATHs by libtool, the result is a binary that
links to what it should be linking to and nothing else.
[ YOCTO #9287 ]
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
There was a clear typo in a function name, correct it.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This variable is used by libtool to know what paths are on the default loader
search path. As we have modified loader paths, native.bbclass can tell libtool
that both the sysroot libdir and the host library paths are searched, so no
RPATHs for those will be generated.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This variable is used by libtool to know what paths are on the default loader
search path. As we have modified loader paths, cross.bbclass can tell libtool
that both the sysroot libdir and the host library paths are searched, so no
RPATHs for those will be generated.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
When switching MACHINE, nativeksdk recipes could end up being rebuilt. Clear
ABIEXTENSION to avoid this problem and ensure sstate checksum consistency.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Switching between multilib configurations should not change allarch recipe
or nativesdk checksums. Add a new sstate test for this based on the standard
allarch test.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
When building boost-native on i686, the x86 override isn't applied
unless the target also happens to be x86. Similarly the x86_64 override
is only applied on 64 bit target machines.
Avoid various problems by removing the new problematic configure options
in the native case.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
gcc-cross target recipes should not depend on SDK_SYS but started to
after recent changes. Remove the dependency to stop this (its caused
by shared code in do_install). The compiler names contain SDK_SYS
so changes would be correctly handled via other means.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
When enabling multilib.conf, the world was rebuilding due to changes in the
pkg-config search path. This doesn't matter so exclude it from the checksums.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
When changing multilibs, allarch recipes should not be rebuilding. This
adds enough variable exclusions to make this work properly. Future
regressions will be prevented with new testing.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
package_write_rpm references the MULTILIBS variable and the checksums
of nativesdk recipes were changing as a result of this.
We don't need/want MULTILIBS values for nativesdk so disable this.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
StreamHandler was added due missing log information on the console in
oe-selftest with Qemu Runner
Signed-off-by: Francisco Pedraza <francisco.j.pedraza.gonzalez@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This begins moving away from the deprecated subprocess calls in an
effort to eventually move to some more global abstraction using the run
convenience method provided in python 3.5.
[ YOCTO #9342 ]
Signed-off-by: Stephano Cetola <stephano.cetola@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Create kbd-ptest sub-package:
* add file run-ptest and runtime dependency make
* modify installed Makefile to disable remake Makefile and the test
cases when run the ptest
* add patch to set proper path for test cases to get resource files
Signed-off-by: Kai Kang <kai.kang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This is a preparation to use mkefidisk as a default wks for
genericx86* BSPs. This change enables usage of partition UUID
instead of device name to specify root partition in kernel
command line. It should make images to boot on devices with
boot device names that differ from what's mentioned in wks file.
Signed-off-by: Ed Bartosh <ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Added 'native' convenience shell script to run native tools.
Example of usage:
> bitbake bmap-tools-native
> native bmaptool --version
Signed-off-by: Ed Bartosh <ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Add a space between the root and append parameter, similar to
syslinux.bbclass, in creating the final grub.cfg.
Without this, the final kernel boot parameters will concatenate into
strings like root=/dev/ram0console=ttyS0...
Signed-off-by: Raymond Tan <raymond.tan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Utilize the new return value (2) from oe-build-perf-test. Do not exit
with an error in case some individual tests fail. Even if some tests
fail we still want to complete successfully, that is, display and
archive the results and do cleanup. The individual tests do not depend
on each other anymore so test failures shouldn't affect the results of
successful tests.
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Add a new return value '2' that indicates that some tests failed but
there were no fatal errors (i.e. configuration mistakes or bugs in the
tests themselves).
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Much as with -native recipes, as addressed in commit
b15730caf0d4c40271796887505507f2501958bb, arch specific variables
like MIPSPKGSFX_ABI were affecting -nativesdk sstate checksums for
recipes like nativesdk-glibc-initial.
Disable multilib_header for nativesdk as we don't use multilibs in
this scenario.
[YOCTO #10320]
Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <joshua.g.lock@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Display default values for '-a' and '-w' command line arguments in the
usage help text.
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Stricter checking of command line arguments. The script doesn't use any
positional arguments so don't accept any and error out if those are
found.
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Add mipsel and mips64el as an option.
Signed-off-by: Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel <Zubair.Kakakhel@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Makes it possible to average over multiple buildstats. If --multi is
specified (and the given path is a directory) the script will read all
buildstats from the given directory and use averaged values calculated
from them.
All of the buildstats must be from a "similar" build, meaning that no
differences in package versions or tasks are allowed. Otherwise, the
script will exit with an error.
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
