diff options
author | Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> | 2012-09-10 13:58:10 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> | 2012-09-10 21:52:37 +0100 |
commit | 48169c6bc44c546cecaa06207b6c36da558b81f7 (patch) | |
tree | a36419441d07e9de0a9490301d93a0880d1c6880 /meta | |
parent | 8d16cbe934291557a26e61266417febcb2e8dfba (diff) | |
download | openembedded-core-48169c6bc44c546cecaa06207b6c36da558b81f7.tar.gz openembedded-core-48169c6bc44c546cecaa06207b6c36da558b81f7.tar.bz2 openembedded-core-48169c6bc44c546cecaa06207b6c36da558b81f7.zip |
classes/packageinfo: use better method to check if package exists
Instead of using a rather error-prone method of looking for output
package files in order to determine if a package got created, use the
.packaged file within pkgdata.
This fixes two separate issues:
* Some packages apparently not being found by this code e.g. all
apm/apmd packages when using ipk packaging.
* Buggy implementation of this checking code which triggered an
exception during the event handler if PKGV was overridden on a
per-package basis (as it is with external-sourcery-toolchain), which
blocked Hob from completing parsing at 99% - fixes [YOCTO #2651].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'meta')
-rw-r--r-- | meta/classes/packageinfo.bbclass | 34 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 26 deletions
diff --git a/meta/classes/packageinfo.bbclass b/meta/classes/packageinfo.bbclass index 26cce604ae..bd7b249bb4 100644 --- a/meta/classes/packageinfo.bbclass +++ b/meta/classes/packageinfo.bbclass @@ -14,32 +14,14 @@ python packageinfo_handler () { for root, dirs, files in os.walk(pkgdata_dir): for pkgname in files: if pkgname.endswith('.packaged'): - continue - sdata = oe.packagedata.read_pkgdatafile(root + pkgname) - sdata['PKG'] = pkgname - pkgrename = sdata['PKG_%s' % pkgname] - pkgv = sdata['PKGV'].replace('-', '+') - pkgr = sdata['PKGR'] - # We found there are some renaming issue with certain architecture. - # For example, armv7a-vfp-neon, it will use armv7a in the rpm file. This is the workaround for it. - arch_tmp = arch.split('-')[0] - if os.path.exists(deploy_dir + '/' + arch + '/' + \ - pkgname + '-' + pkgv + '-' + pkgr + '.' + arch + '.' + packaging) or \ - os.path.exists(deploy_dir + '/' + arch + '/' + \ - pkgname + '-' + pkgv + '-' + pkgr + '.' + arch_tmp + '.' + packaging) or \ - os.path.exists(deploy_dir + '/' + arch + '/' + \ - pkgrename + '-' + pkgv + '-' + pkgr + '.' + arch + '.' + packaging) or \ - os.path.exists(deploy_dir + '/' + arch + '/' + \ - pkgrename + '-' + pkgv + '-' + pkgr + '.' + arch_tmp + '.' + packaging) or \ - os.path.exists(deploy_dir + '/' + arch + '/' + \ - pkgname + '_' + pkgv + '-' + pkgr + '_' + arch + '.' + packaging) or \ - os.path.exists(deploy_dir + '/' + arch + '/' + \ - pkgname + '_' + pkgv + '-' + pkgr + '_' + arch_tmp + '.' + packaging) or \ - os.path.exists(deploy_dir + '/' + arch + '/' + \ - pkgrename + '_' + pkgv + '-' + pkgr + '_' + arch + '.' + packaging) or \ - os.path.exists(deploy_dir + '/' + arch + '/' + \ - pkgrename + '_' + pkgv + '-' + pkgr + '_' + arch_tmp + '.' + packaging): - pkginfolist.append(sdata) + pkgname = pkgname[:-9] + pkgdatafile = root + pkgname + try: + sdata = oe.packagedata.read_pkgdatafile(pkgdatafile) + sdata['PKG'] = pkgname + pkginfolist.append(sdata) + except Exception as e: + bb.warn("Failed to read pkgdata file %s: %s: %s" % (pkgdatafile, e.__class__, str(e))) bb.event.fire(bb.event.PackageInfo(pkginfolist), e.data) } |