summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.9
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>2016-01-27 08:47:10 -0500
committerRichard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>2016-01-29 18:14:54 +0000
commit3e98ba4d6c1d1e4919ce373ec031d41c2538f10b (patch)
treefacd7a17181870b991b6271f759ff1412059c0fc /meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.9
parent562310ac906ffc4a7f1be5fce6e2e8395724fcff (diff)
downloadopenembedded-core-3e98ba4d6c1d1e4919ce373ec031d41c2538f10b.tar.gz
openembedded-core-3e98ba4d6c1d1e4919ce373ec031d41c2538f10b.tar.bz2
openembedded-core-3e98ba4d6c1d1e4919ce373ec031d41c2538f10b.zip
gcc: fix hidden weak symbols by removing buggy gcc patch
We are noticing the presence of the following patch in various openembedded gcc versions: 0024-PR-target-32219.patch However, contrarily to its "Backport" status, that patch is not upstream in gcc, and it breaks handling of start/stop automatic weak hidden symbols we use in lttng-ust. We are only experiencing problems on the various openembedded compilers, but on no other distro (with same compiler versions), which led us to suspect a buggy distro-specific gcc patch. We've been testing with openembedded gcc-4.9.2-r0. Rebuilding the gcc compiler with this patch removed fixes the lttng-ust issue. Link: http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2016-January/116306.html Link: http://lists.lttng.org/pipermail/lttng-dev/2014-May/023112.html Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2014-05/msg00042.html Link: http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=3cb2b003db7371b3a47d02c08352a262e1e419b4 Link: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15435 Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.9')
-rw-r--r--meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.9/0024-PR-target-32219.patch62
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 62 deletions
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.9/0024-PR-target-32219.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.9/0024-PR-target-32219.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 45acf7fd23..0000000000
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.9/0024-PR-target-32219.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,62 +0,0 @@
-From e0d15f4f8bf28c351b9215ca37f1caa24df0e1fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 09:18:54 +0400
-Subject: [PATCH 24/35] PR target/32219
-
-* varasm.c (default_binds_local_p_1): Weak data is not local.
-
-Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
-Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
-
-Upstream-Status: Backport
----
- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/visibility-21.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
- gcc/varasm.c | 9 ++++-----
- 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
- create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/visibility-21.c
-
-Index: gcc-4.9-20140316/gcc/varasm.c
-===================================================================
---- gcc-4.9-20140316.orig/gcc/varasm.c
-+++ gcc-4.9-20140316/gcc/varasm.c
-@@ -6771,6 +6771,10 @@ default_binds_local_p_1 (const_tree exp,
- /* Static variables are always local. */
- else if (! TREE_PUBLIC (exp))
- local_p = true;
-+ /* hidden weak can't be overridden by something non-local, all
-+ that is possible is that it is not defined at all. */
-+ else if (DECL_WEAK (exp))
-+ local_p = false;
- /* A variable is local if the user has said explicitly that it will
- be. */
- else if ((DECL_VISIBILITY_SPECIFIED (exp)
-@@ -6784,11 +6788,6 @@ default_binds_local_p_1 (const_tree exp,
- local. */
- else if (DECL_VISIBILITY (exp) != VISIBILITY_DEFAULT)
- local_p = true;
-- /* Default visibility weak data can be overridden by a strong symbol
-- in another module and so are not local. */
-- else if (DECL_WEAK (exp)
-- && !resolved_locally)
-- local_p = false;
- /* If PIC, then assume that any global name can be overridden by
- symbols resolved from other modules. */
- else if (shlib)
-Index: gcc-4.9-20140316/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/visibility-22.c
-===================================================================
---- /dev/null
-+++ gcc-4.9-20140316/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/visibility-22.c
-@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
-+/* PR target/32219 */
-+/* { dg-do run } */
-+/* { dg-require-visibility "" } */
-+/* { dg-options "-fPIC" { target fpic } } */
-+
-+extern void f() __attribute__((weak,visibility("hidden")));
-+extern int puts( char const* );
-+int main()
-+{
-+ if (f)
-+ f();
-+ return 0;
-+}