diff options
author | Aníbal Limón <anibal.limon@linux.intel.com> | 2017-04-18 17:22:02 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> | 2017-04-20 07:54:10 +0100 |
commit | 2ba9dd490d69544553fc8a837fb5034a6746ab51 (patch) | |
tree | 270204ab878cd64ef555b7d51c4e1bd3847cfa72 /meta/classes | |
parent | 705669f8221027b525773a512beb25a7ea5f0275 (diff) | |
download | openembedded-core-2ba9dd490d69544553fc8a837fb5034a6746ab51.tar.gz openembedded-core-2ba9dd490d69544553fc8a837fb5034a6746ab51.tar.bz2 openembedded-core-2ba9dd490d69544553fc8a837fb5034a6746ab51.zip |
package_rpm.bbclass: Dosen't filter Conflicts if found in Provides
This filter was add to make compilence with debian packaging but in
package_deb.bbclass is allowed to have the same values in Conflicts and
Provides.
With this filtering errors in recipe meta-data are hidden and could end
on install two packages that conflicts [2].
Reviewing the RPM spec from Fedora doesn't have anything that denies to
use the both Conflicts and Provides with the same value [3], also in
debian manual section 7.6.2 of [4] this behaviour is allowed to force
the removal of the conflicted package and RPM is compilence with this
behaviour after remove the filtering this is seen [5].
[1]
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=4b611b66743a5ec220aef34d796af63029bb5fd9
[2] https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9349#c9
[3]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/RPM_Guide/ch-advanced-packaging.html
[4] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html
[5] https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9349#c12
Signed-off-by: Aníbal Limón <anibal.limon@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'meta/classes')
-rw-r--r-- | meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass | 26 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 26 deletions
diff --git a/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass b/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass index 07ab5cdd9e..084546f733 100644 --- a/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass +++ b/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass @@ -433,19 +433,6 @@ python write_specfile () { print_deps(splitrsuggests, "Suggests", spec_preamble_bottom, d) print_deps(splitrprovides, "Provides", spec_preamble_bottom, d) print_deps(splitrobsoletes, "Obsoletes", spec_preamble_bottom, d) - - # conflicts can not be in a provide! We will need to filter it. - if splitrconflicts: - depends_dict = bb.utils.explode_dep_versions2(splitrconflicts) - newdeps_dict = {} - for dep in depends_dict: - if dep not in splitrprovides: - newdeps_dict[dep] = depends_dict[dep] - if newdeps_dict: - splitrconflicts = bb.utils.join_deps(newdeps_dict) - else: - splitrconflicts = "" - print_deps(splitrconflicts, "Conflicts", spec_preamble_bottom, d) spec_preamble_bottom.append('') @@ -541,19 +528,6 @@ python write_specfile () { print_deps(srcrsuggests, "Suggests", spec_preamble_top, d) print_deps(srcrprovides + (" /bin/sh" if srcname.startswith("nativesdk-") else ""), "Provides", spec_preamble_top, d) print_deps(srcrobsoletes, "Obsoletes", spec_preamble_top, d) - - # conflicts can not be in a provide! We will need to filter it. - if srcrconflicts: - depends_dict = bb.utils.explode_dep_versions2(srcrconflicts) - newdeps_dict = {} - for dep in depends_dict: - if dep not in srcrprovides: - newdeps_dict[dep] = depends_dict[dep] - if newdeps_dict: - srcrconflicts = bb.utils.join_deps(newdeps_dict) - else: - srcrconflicts = "" - print_deps(srcrconflicts, "Conflicts", spec_preamble_top, d) spec_preamble_top.append('') |