This was overlooked when f6a064d969f4149b was merged.

Signed-off-by: Kristian Amlie <kristian.amlie@mender.io>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>

This is a non-existent event - we already have the actual
bb.build.TaskSucceeded further down in the list hence why it wasn't
noticed earlier.

Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

If a task such as do_fetch fails when we're extracting source for a
recipe (within devtool modify / upgrade / extract / sync) then we should
naturally stop processing instead of blundering on; in order to do that
we need to be listening for the TaskFailed event. Thanks to Richard
Purdie for noticing and fixing this.

Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

Most of the other extract-based commands have this option but oddly I
left it out for modify - I guess because if I was debugging an issue here
I just used devtool extract to do so, but there's no reason why we can't
have it here and it is useful.

Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

It is fairly common that BSP layers enable recipes when choosing
machines from that layer without checking whether the recipe actually
builds in the current distro. That breaks "bitbake world", retrieving
signatures and thus the test_machine_signatures test.

It's better to let that test continue with the signatures that can be
retrieved and report the broken world build separately. Right now, the
new test_machine_world iterates over all machines. More elegant and
useful in combination with a (currently missing) selection of which
tests to run would be to generate one test instance per machine. But that
is not straightforward and has to wait.

The "-k" argument alone was not enough to proceed despite failures,
because bitbake then still returns a non-zero exit code. The existance
of the output file is taken as sign that the bitbake execution managed
was not fatally broken.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

Selecting a machine is only allowed to affect the signature of tasks
that are specific to that machine. In other words, when MACHINE=A and
MACHINE=B share a recipe foo and the output of foo, then both machine
configurations must build foo in exactly the same way. Otherwise it is
not possible to use both machines in the same distribution.

This criteria can only be tested by testing different machines in combination,
i.e. one main layer, potentially several additional BSP layers and an explicit
choice of machines:
yocto-compat-layer --additional-layers .../meta-intel --machines intel-corei7-64 imx6slevk -- .../meta-freescale

To simplify the analysis and limit the amount of output, mismatches
are sorted by task order such that tasks that run first are also
reported first. Following tasks for the same recipe and set of
machines then get pruned, because they are likely to be different
because of the underlying task (same approach as in
test_signatures). The difference here is that we get information about
all machines. The task order in the base configuration serves as
heuristic for sorting that merged list.

The test has already found issues in go-cross (depended on
tune-specific libgcc) and gdb-cross (had a tune-specific path
unnecessarily), so it is also useful to uncover issues that are not
caused by the BSP layer itself.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

If devtool is called with a URL to a source repository containing a
node.js module, we don't know that until recipetool has fetched it, and
due to the structure of the code we have to exit with a special code in
order to let devtool know it needs to build nodejs-native. We also want
to suppress the error message that recipetool would normally print under
these circumstances; there is already a mechanism for this but it wasn't
operative in the case where we're pointed to a source repository rather
than an npm:// URL, so create some plumbing so that we know to hide the
message.

Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

If recipetool returns with exit code 14 this means devtool needs to
build nodejs-native and then call it again. If recipetool returns exit
code 14 again then clearly something has gone wrong and we should just
quit with an error.

Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

The change over to recipe specific sysroots means that we can no longer
get a known location simply from configuration for the npm binary - we
need to get the recipe sysroot for nodejs-native, look there for npm if
we need to check it's present, and add that to PATH when calling out to
npm. Unfortunately this means anywhere we need to get that path we have
to have parsed all recipes, otherwise we have no reliable way of
resolving nodejs-native. Thus we have to change recipetool create to
always parse all recipes (the structure of the code does not allow us to
do this conditionally).

In the worst case, if npm hasn't already been added to its own sysroot
and we are fetching from a source repository rather than an npm
registry, this gets a bit ugly because we end up parsing recipes three
times:
1) recipetool startup, which then fetches the code and determines it's
   a node.js module, finds that npm isn't available and then exits with
   a specific error to tell devtool it needs to build npm
2) when we invoke bitbake -c addto_recipe_sysroot nodejs-native
3) when we re-invoke recipetool

This code is badly in need of refactoring, but now is unfortunately not
the time to do that, so we're going to have to live with this ugliness
for now.

Fixes [YOCTO #10992].

Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

OE-Core commit c0cfd9b1d54b05ad048f444d6fe248aa0500159e added handling
for AND / OR in license strings coming from npm, but made the assumption
that an & would always be present in the license value. Check if it's
there first so we don't fail if it isn't.

Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>