- DirectFB is not supported by gtk versions >= 2.18
- use packagegroup-core-directfb instead of packagegroup-core-gtk-directfb

[YOCTO #3642]

Signed-off-by: Constantin Musca <constantinx.musca@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

This provides one package group, packagegroup-core-apps-console, which
is usually brought in by adding "apps-console-core" to IMAGE_FEATURES.
Aside from the naming inconsistencies, this is a group of mostly
unrelated packages, none of which are actually "apps". Handling each
one:

* dbus: should mostly be brought in by package runtime dependencies
* avahi-daemon: if you are using packagegroup-base (as all images that
  inherit from core-image do) this is brought in by having "zeroconf" in
  DISTRO_FEATURES.
* portmap: not very useful by itself; should be brought in by selecting
  NFS server/client through other means.
* psplash (or whatever SPLASH is set to): this has been changed to be
  an explicit item "splash" in IMAGE_FEATURES. Since this is a fairly
  fundamental feature, a piece of code has been added to automatically
  handle this for images still using apps-console-core (and show a
  warning).

Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>

These aren't useful at the moment, so remove them and all references to
them.

Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>

There's only one package, just make it the main one; also update
core-image-gtk-directfb to match and tidy it up a bit.

Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>

Rename to better reflects its purpose, and move under recipes-graphics.

Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>

Move Sato applications to packagegroup-core-x11-sato.

Note that this eliminates both the apps-x11-core and apps-x11-games
IMAGE_FEATURES; in practice it is unlikely these were useful to anyone
outside of the Sato images however.

Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>

"Package group" is a much more appropriate name for these than task,
since we use the word task to describe units of work executed by
BitBake.

Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>

This indirection does not add anything in terms of configuration and
only serves to increase confusion; and given the nature of these it is
unlikely they are being used outside of OE-Core. Change the sato-sdk and
sato-dev images to be based on the main Sato image (avoiding the need
for a common SATO_IMAGE_FEATURES variable) and eliminate all references
to them.

Fixes [YOCTO #2458].

Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>

As module-init-tools package does not exist anymore there's no reason to
have it in the IMAGE_INSTALL package list. If RPM package manager is
used, build will fail with:

Unable to find package module-init-tools (module-init-tools)!

[Yocto #2580]

Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Palcu <laurentiu.palcu@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>