opkg remove perl --force-removal-of-dependent-packages
...
Removing package perl-module-extutils-mm-dos from root...
...
Removing package perl-module-extutils-mm-dos from root...
You can force removal of packages with failed prerm scripts with the option:
	--force-remove
No packages removed.
Collected errors:
 * pkg_run_script: Internal error: perl-module-extutils-mm-dos has a
NULL tmp_unpack_dir.
 * opkg_remove_pkg: not removing package "perl-module-extutils-mm-dos",
prerm script failed
...

While remove pkg with '--force-removal-of-dependent-packages',
pkg may be added to remove list multiple times, add status
check to make sure pkg only be removed once.

[YOCTO #6819]

(From OE-Core rev: 476f864b1564265469b5c9074c1f262bce21f119)

Signed-off-by: Hongxu Jia <hongxu.jia@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>

The 'opkg-key' utility requires gpg to manage the list of trusted keys. The
ability to verify package signatures is not much use without the ability to add
keys to the trusted list...

Signed-off-by: Paul Barker <paul@paulbarker.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

In the code added by add-exclude.patch, the return values of malloc and realloc
were not checked before being dereferenced.

In opkg we can use xmalloc and xrealloc instead of malloc and realloc. These
functions terminate the program instead of returning NULL if memory allocation
fails.

Signed-off-by: Paul Barker <paul@paulbarker.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

The patches for opkg have been rebased using git so that they apply cleanly onto
the new release.

Signed-off-by: Paul Barker <paul@paulbarker.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

The base_contains is kept as a compatibility method and we ought to
not use it in OE-Core so we can remove it from base metadata in
future.

Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

BitBake has the exact same code as oe.utils.contains so there's no
reason to duplicate it. We now rely on the bb.utils.contains code for
metadata.

Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

Just use the run-postinsts recipe for running first boot postinstalls.

[YOCTO #5666]

Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Palcu <laurentiu.palcu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

v0.2.1 of opkg is a minor bugfix release.

Tested on qemux86 to ensure opkg-native can build an image and opkg can update,
remove and install packages.

Signed-off-by: Paul Barker <paul@paulbarker.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>

The case statement for ARGS_OPT_ADD_EXCLUDE added to the argument handling
switch statement in opkg was missing a "break;" at the end, so it was falling
through into the handler for ARGS_OPT_NOACTION. Thus when "--add-exclude" was
specified on the command line it was as if "--noaction" was also being
specified. This appears to be the root cause of YP bug 5311.

Tested using the case described by Alexandru Georgescu in YP bug 5311:

    MACHINE ??= "qemux86"
    IMAGE_INSTALL_append = " man"
    PACKAGE_EXCLUDE = "man"
    PACKAGE_CLASSES ?= "package_ipk"

Built image and boot tested on qemu, ensured that man was not installed but the
rest of the system was installed correctly.

Signed-off-by: Paul Barker <paul@paulbarker.me.uk>
Cc: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
Cc: Saul Wold <saul.wold@intel.com>
Cc: Alexandru Georgescu <alexandru.c.georgescu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>

Catch some u-a-cworth references that slipped through the move of u-a
to opkg-utils and its rename to -opkg.

Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>