openembedded-core.git/meta/recipes-devtools/elfutils/elfutils_0.148.bb, branch morty Mirror of openembedded-core elfutils-0.148: Fix build with gcc6 2016-05-19T21:31:33+00:00 Khem Raj raj.khem@gmail.com 2016-05-18T21:56:37+00:00 c2668171f5d76bfea085ecf2fa7dfe1e42df1e63 Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> 
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
elfutils: Fix build with uclibc/musl 2016-01-29T18:14:51+00:00 Khem Raj raj.khem@gmail.com 2015-12-26T20:01:44+00:00 a28c70455931e0b7e3449a76c3b9132bd572478b Remove mempcpy patch its already in uclibc now refresh libargp patch to match latest elfutils Add ALLOW_EMPTY for musl core-image-cmdline-full asks for elfutils package to be added to package it has all eu-* tools but we dont build them on musl. nevertheless lets satisfy the dependency so image can build for musl Build libdw,libasm,libebl along with libelf enhance the musl portability patch to compile every other library except the eu-* tools Fix build on aarch64/musl issues Header inclusion ends up with duplicate definitions of iovec struct since uclibc defines the same in usersapce, we have been depending upong including the kernel header on aarch64, using sys/uio.h is the right approach Fix x86 build warning seen on musl Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> 
Remove mempcpy patch its already in uclibc now
refresh libargp patch to match latest elfutils

Add ALLOW_EMPTY for musl

core-image-cmdline-full asks for elfutils package to be added to package
it has all eu-* tools but we dont build them on musl. nevertheless lets
satisfy the dependency so image can build for musl

Build libdw,libasm,libebl along with libelf

enhance the musl portability patch to compile every other library
except the eu-* tools

Fix build on aarch64/musl issues

Header inclusion ends up with duplicate definitions of iovec struct
since uclibc defines the same in usersapce, we have been depending upong
including the kernel header on aarch64, using sys/uio.h is the right
approach

Fix x86 build warning seen on musl

Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
elfutils: enable fix-build-gcc-4.8.patch 2015-04-30T22:01:27+00:00 Robert Yang liezhi.yang@windriver.com 2015-04-28T03:43:31+00:00 c577a52b252ccbad9a8dde79c6a4a4f23376d9d8 The patch fixes a warning seen with gcc 4.8 (especially on ubuntu 13.10) Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> 
The patch fixes a warning seen with gcc 4.8 (especially on ubuntu 13.10)

Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
elfutils: fix an incorrect patch for 0.161 2015-04-15T13:18:54+00:00 Junling Zheng zhengjunling@huawei.com 2015-04-09T12:56:27+00:00 64acb72e7ec63528073d8290137fe74d3382f876 The original uclibc-support.patch is not compatible with elfutils-0.161. It should be corrected through adjusting context. So regenerate a new patch for elfutils-0.161, rename the patch for elfutils-0.148, and put them into respective directories. Signed-off-by: Junling Zheng <zhengjunling@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> 
The original uclibc-support.patch is not compatible with elfutils-0.161.
It should be corrected through adjusting context.

So regenerate a new patch for elfutils-0.161, rename the patch for
elfutils-0.148, and put them into respective directories.

Signed-off-by: Junling Zheng <zhengjunling@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
elfutils: remove libdw-dev libasm-dev libelf-dev from PACKAGES 2015-04-13T21:28:34+00:00 Robert Yang liezhi.yang@windriver.com 2015-04-10T09:30:01+00:00 0dacfcc974068569f88adc8e33aea3ee1c7676de There should be only one dev and dbg package Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> 
There should be only one dev and dbg package

Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
elfutils 0.148: use BPN in SRC_URI 2015-02-07T18:52:47+00:00 Robert Yang liezhi.yang@windriver.com 2015-02-02T08:59:13+00:00 e2546c26acaf8fc47114398e3c4a15d17f0f07fb Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com> 
Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
elfutils_0.148.bb: CVE-2014-9447 fix 2015-01-29T10:37:53+00:00 Li xin lixin.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com 2015-01-22T06:41:20+00:00 c992868a989926eac6c4b78a6bb9729bce54f2ed Reference: http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2014-9447 Signed-off-by: Li Xin <lixin.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> 
Reference: http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2014-9447

Signed-off-by: Li Xin <lixin.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
elfutils: fix elf_cvt_gnuhash 2014-10-30T13:12:58+00:00 Roy Li rongqing.li@windriver.com 2014-10-28T05:09:41+00:00 b7936bacf0cc89bdda6722d317274bd4a3af840a The 'dest' and 'src' can be same, we need to save the value of src32[2] before swaping it. Signed-off-by: Roy Li <rongqing.li@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> 
The 'dest' and 'src' can be same, we need to save the value of src32[2]
before swaping it.

Signed-off-by: Roy Li <rongqing.li@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Replace one-line DESCRIPTION with SUMMARY 2014-01-02T12:47:33+00:00 Paul Eggleton paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com 2013-12-19T15:13:01+00:00 b8feee3cf21f70ba4ec3b822d2f596d4fc02a292 A lot of our recipes had short one-line DESCRIPTION values and no SUMMARY value set. In this case it's much better to just set SUMMARY since DESCRIPTION is defaulted from SUMMARY anyway and then the SUMMARY is at least useful. I also took the opportunity to fix up a lot of the new SUMMARY values, making them concisely explain the function of the recipe / package where possible. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> 
A lot of our recipes had short one-line DESCRIPTION values and no
SUMMARY value set. In this case it's much better to just set SUMMARY
since DESCRIPTION is defaulted from SUMMARY anyway and then the SUMMARY
is at least useful. I also took the opportunity to fix up a lot of the
new SUMMARY values, making them concisely explain the function of the
recipe / package where possible.

Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
elfutils: Drop do_autoreconf patches 2013-09-02T17:02:54+00:00 Richard Purdie richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org 2013-09-02T10:25:10+00:00 37e9a01d38892e8a6fd225854e5b8cc332a5f2ea The do-autoreconf patches only change generated files. We run autoreconf ourselves so we don't need these patches. Worse, they cause failures since the do_patch task can't rerun after configure since the files change and the patch is no longer clean. Drop the patches since we don't need them. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> 
The do-autoreconf patches only change generated files. We run autoreconf ourselves
so we don't need these patches. Worse, they cause failures since the do_patch
task can't rerun after configure since the files change and the patch is no longer
clean.

Drop the patches since we don't need them.

Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>