openembedded-core.git/meta/recipes-devtools/elfutils/elfutils-0.158/fixheadercheck.patch, branch pyro Mirror of openembedded-core elfutils: upgrade to 0.160 2014-11-25T12:58:19+00:00 Hongxu Jia hongxu.jia@windriver.com 2014-11-14T09:29:03+00:00 74b191022494fc1d357c1f05dbce38c986bed365 - Upgrade elfutils to 0.160 - Move 0.148 patches from elfutils to elfutils-0.148 - Drop 0.158 patches that got from debain, so far debian doesn't provide patches for 0.160 (the latest is 0.159) - Move fixheadercheck.patch from 0.159 to 0.160 - We choose to use 0.159 patches from debian for the current 0.160 which located in elfutils-0.160 1) Rebase the following patches from 0.159 to 0.160 hppa_backend.diff arm_backend.diff mips_backend.diff m68k_backend.diff arm_func_value.patch arm_unwind_ret_mask.patch 2) Rebase redhat-portability.diff according to commit 52a6d20519870103134166d91e22d21fd736195d Author: Roxana Ciobanu <roxana.ciobanu@intel.com> Date: Tue Jul 1 17:17:00 2014 +0300 elfutils/elfutils-native: Fix patching generated files 3) Drop the following patches which have already beem merged to 0.160 arm_unsupported.patch arm_syscall.patch unaligned.patch aarch64-run-native-test-fix.patch Signed-off-by: Hongxu Jia <hongxu.jia@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> 
- Upgrade elfutils to 0.160

- Move 0.148 patches from elfutils to elfutils-0.148

- Drop 0.158 patches that got from debain, so far debian
  doesn't provide patches for 0.160 (the latest is 0.159)

- Move fixheadercheck.patch from 0.159 to 0.160

- We choose to use 0.159 patches from debian for the current 0.160
  which located in elfutils-0.160
  1) Rebase the following patches from 0.159 to 0.160
     hppa_backend.diff
     arm_backend.diff
     mips_backend.diff
     m68k_backend.diff
     arm_func_value.patch
     arm_unwind_ret_mask.patch

  2) Rebase redhat-portability.diff according to
     commit 52a6d20519870103134166d91e22d21fd736195d
     Author: Roxana Ciobanu <roxana.ciobanu@intel.com>
     Date:   Tue Jul 1 17:17:00 2014 +0300
       elfutils/elfutils-native: Fix patching generated files

  3) Drop the following patches which have already beem merged to 0.160
     arm_unsupported.patch
     arm_syscall.patch
     unaligned.patch
     aarch64-run-native-test-fix.patch

Signed-off-by: Hongxu Jia <hongxu.jia@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
elfutils: Fix debugedit failure in grub 2014-06-13T11:52:46+00:00 Richard Purdie richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org 2014-06-13T07:58:30+00:00 b34447fa5223b4e0be49594aaf0254defd69bbd1 We've seeing occasional debugedit failures in grub during do_package which in turn are coming from section alignment failures from libelf. The failures occur when gold is used to link grub instead of ld.bfd. "readelf -e uhci.module" shows: Section Headers: [Nr] Name Type Addr Off Size ES Flg Lk Inf Al [12] .note.GNU-stack PROGBITS 00000000 0010ce 000000 00 0 0 1 in a good build and: Section Headers: [Nr] Name Type Addr Off Size ES Flg Lk Inf Al [24] .note.GNU-stack PROGBITS 00000000 009180 000000 00 0 0 0 in a bad build. The problem is the "Al" (alignment) change from 1 to 0. If its 0, debugedit complains. As far as I can tell, the alignment of a zero length section is not an issue and the check in libelf should check the section size and only give alignment errors if there is some data to align. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> 
We've seeing occasional debugedit failures in grub during do_package
which in turn are coming from section alignment failures from libelf.
The failures occur when gold is used to link grub instead of ld.bfd.

"readelf -e uhci.module" shows:

Section Headers:
  [Nr] Name              Type            Addr     Off    Size   ES Flg Lk Inf Al
  [12] .note.GNU-stack   PROGBITS        00000000 0010ce 000000 00      0   0  1

in a good build and:

Section Headers:
  [Nr] Name              Type            Addr     Off    Size   ES Flg Lk Inf Al
  [24] .note.GNU-stack   PROGBITS        00000000 009180 000000 00      0   0  0

in a bad build. The problem is the "Al" (alignment) change from 1 to 0.
If its 0, debugedit complains.

As far as I can tell, the alignment of a zero length section is not
an issue and the check in libelf should check the section size and only
give alignment errors if there is some data to align.

Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>