From 665b18531d8ae69b3f1af008a3153c6298d3061a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marcin Juszkiewicz Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 16:31:13 +0000 Subject: gnutls: added 1.4.0 (current stable) - we probably should drop 1.0.xx (old old stable) and 1.3.5 (development) versions --- packages/gnutls/gnutls-1.4.0/gnutls-texinfo-euro.patch | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) create mode 100644 packages/gnutls/gnutls-1.4.0/gnutls-texinfo-euro.patch (limited to 'packages/gnutls/gnutls-1.4.0/gnutls-texinfo-euro.patch') diff --git a/packages/gnutls/gnutls-1.4.0/gnutls-texinfo-euro.patch b/packages/gnutls/gnutls-1.4.0/gnutls-texinfo-euro.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..e2a2762424 --- /dev/null +++ b/packages/gnutls/gnutls-1.4.0/gnutls-texinfo-euro.patch @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +The version of texinfo in Debian Sarge does not understand the @euro{} command. +This patch replaces the @euro{} command with the word "euro". + +--- gnutls-1.3.5/doc/signatures.texi.orig 2006-04-26 08:06:40.918268000 +0930 ++++ gnutls-1.3.5/doc/signatures.texi 2006-04-26 08:06:52.446515440 +0930 +@@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ + long as it is difficult enough to generate two different messages with + the same hash algorithm output. In that case the same signature could + be used as a proof for both messages. Nobody wants to sign an innocent +-message of donating 1 @euro{} to Greenpeace and find out that he +-donated 1.000.000 @euro{} to Bad Inc. ++message of donating 1 euro to Greenpeace and find out that he ++donated 1.000.000 euro to Bad Inc. + + For a hash algorithm to be called cryptographic the following three + requirements must hold -- cgit v1.2.3