From e243c30f04c18722dc65effe6d4f275a3f35de46 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jesse Gilles Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 11:51:34 -0600 Subject: initial commit of mLinux layer --- .../bash/bash-4.2/mkbuiltins_have_stringize.patch | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+) create mode 100644 recipes-extended/bash/bash-4.2/mkbuiltins_have_stringize.patch (limited to 'recipes-extended/bash/bash-4.2/mkbuiltins_have_stringize.patch') diff --git a/recipes-extended/bash/bash-4.2/mkbuiltins_have_stringize.patch b/recipes-extended/bash/bash-4.2/mkbuiltins_have_stringize.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a9391d6 --- /dev/null +++ b/recipes-extended/bash/bash-4.2/mkbuiltins_have_stringize.patch @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ +On hosts with FORTIFY_SOURCES, stringize support is required, as it's used by +the macros to wrap functions (e.g. read and open in unistd.h). Those wrappers +use the STRING() macro from unistd.h. A header in the bash sources overrides +the unistd.h macro to 'x' when HAVE_STRINGIZE is not defined, causing the +wrappers to generate calls to 'xread' and 'xopen', which do not exist, +resulting in a failure to link. + +Assume we have stringize support when cross-compiling, which works around the +issue. + +It may be best for upstream to either give up on supporting compilers without +stringize support, or to not define STRING() at all when FORTIFY_SOURCES is +defined, letting the unistd.h one be used, instead. + +Upstream-Status: Pending + +--- bash-4.2.orig/builtins/mkbuiltins.c ++++ bash-4.2/builtins/mkbuiltins.c +@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ + # define HAVE_STDLIB_H + + # define HAVE_RENAME ++# define HAVE_STRINGIZE + #endif /* CROSS_COMPILING */ + + #if defined (HAVE_UNISTD_H) -- cgit v1.2.3